Literature DB >> 31862447

The Relationship of Age and Other Baseline Factors to Outcome of Initial Surgery for Intermittent Exotropia.

Michael X Repka1, Danielle L Chandler2, Jonathan M Holmes3, Sean P Donahue4, Darren L Hoover5, Brian G Mohney3, Paul H Phillips6, Ann U Stout7, Benjamin H Ticho8, David K Wallace9.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether age at surgery is associated with surgical outcome of intermittent exotropia (IXT) at 3 years.
DESIGN: Secondary analysis of pooled data from a randomized trial.
METHODS: A total of 197 children 3 to <11 years of age with basic-type IXT of 15-40 prism diopters (Δ) were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 surgical procedures for treatment of intermittent exotropia. Masked examinations were conducted every 6 months for 3 years. The primary outcome was suboptimal surgical outcome by 3 years, defined as constant or intermittent exotropia of ≥10 Δ at distance or near by simultaneous prism and cover test (SPCT); constant esotropia of ≥6 Δ at distance or near by SPCT; or decrease in near stereoacuity of ≥2 octaves, at any masked examination; or reoperation without meeting any of these criteria.
RESULTS: The cumulative probability of a suboptimal surgical outcome by 3 years was 28% (19 of 72) for children 3 to <5 years of age, compared with 50% (57 of 125) for children 5 to <11 years of age (adjusted hazard ratio = 2.05; 95% confidence interval = 1.16 to 3.60). No statistically significant associations were found between suboptimal outcome and other baseline factors (magnitude of deviation, control score, fixation preference, or near stereoacuity) (P values ≥ .20).
CONCLUSIONS: This analysis suggests that in children with IXT, younger age at surgery (3 to <5 years) is associated with better surgical outcomes; however, further evidence from a randomized trial comparing immediate with delayed surgery is needed for confirmation.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31862447      PMCID: PMC7137095          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.12.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  10 in total

1.  Early surgery in intermittent exotropia.

Authors:  J A Pratt-Johnson; J M Barlow; G Tillson
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  Intermittent exotropia: relation between age and surgical outcome: a change-point analysis.

Authors:  A Awadein; R M Eltanamly; M Elshazly
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Timely surgery in intermittent and constant exotropia for superior sensory outcome.

Authors:  A D Abroms; B G Mohney; D P Rush; M M Parks; P Y Tong
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  New tests of distance stereoacuity and their role in evaluating intermittent exotropia.

Authors:  Jonathan M Holmes; Eileen E Birch; David A Leske; Valeria L Fu; Brian G Mohney
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  An office-based scale for assessing control in intermittent exotropia.

Authors:  Brian G Mohney; Jonathan M Holmes
Journal:  Strabismus       Date:  2006-09

6.  Outcome study of bilateral lateral rectus recession for intermittent exotropia in children.

Authors:  M R Ing; J Nishimura; L Okino
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1997

7.  Final version of the Distance Randot Stereotest: normative data, reliability, and validity.

Authors:  Jingyun Wang; Sarah R Hatt; Anna R O'Connor; James R Drover; Russell Adams; Eileen E Birch; Jonathan M Holmes
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 1.220

8.  Assessment of a new Distance Randot stereoacuity test.

Authors:  Valeria L N Fu; Eileen E Birch; Jonathan M Holmes
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.220

9.  A Randomized Trial Comparing Bilateral Lateral Rectus Recession versus Unilateral Recess and Resect for Basic-Type Intermittent Exotropia.

Authors:  Sean P Donahue; Danielle L Chandler; Jonathan M Holmes; Brian W Arthur; Evelyn A Paysse; David K Wallace; David B Petersen; B Michele Melia; Raymond T Kraker; Aaron M Miller
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Randot Preschool Stereoacuity Test: normative data and validity.

Authors:  Eileen Birch; Cathy Williams; James Drover; Valeria Fu; Christina Cheng; Kate Northstone; Mary Courage; Russell Adams
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2007-08-27       Impact factor: 1.220

  10 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  Interventions for intermittent exotropia.

Authors:  Yi Pang; Lawrence Gnanaraj; Jessica Gayleard; Genie Han; Sarah R Hatt
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-09-13

2.  Extraocular muscle resection, recession length and surgery outcome modelling in strabismus treatment: a pilot study.

Authors:  Ala Paduca; Oleg Arnaut; Eugeniu Bendelic; Jan Richard Bruenech; Per Olof Lundmark
Journal:  BMJ Open Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-11-05

3.  Longitudinal Rehabilitation of Binocular Function in Adolescent Intermittent Exotropia After Successful Corrective Surgery.

Authors:  Tingting Peng; Meiping Xu; Fuhao Zheng; Junxiao Zhang; Shuang Chen; Jiangtao Lou; Chunxiao Wang; Yuwen Wang; Xinping Yu
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 4.677

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.