Literature DB >> 30182743

Ambient dose during intra-oral radiography with current techniques: Part 2 quantifying the remnant beam - an in vivo study.

Reinier C Hoogeveen1, Christine Ch Pfältzer1, Wer Berkhout1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: : (1) To find a safe reference transmission factor for the remnant beam to be used when assessing the remnant beam during intra-oral radiography. (2) To identify factors such as exposure type, side (left or right), gender and age that might significantly affect transmission.
METHODS: : Measurements were performed in the remnant beam during 323 intra-oral exposures of 43 patients. The exposure parameters were 60 kV and 7 mA. These measurements were compared with values in the same setting, but without a patient present to arrive at a transmission value. Differences between types of exposure [bitewing (BW), incisor and canine (IC) periapical, premolar and molar (PM) periapical], exposure side (left or right), gender and age were statistically analysed. The reference value was based on the exposure yielding the highest transmission value, to which a safety margin of two standard deviations (SDs) was added, and then rounding up.
RESULTS: : The respective mean transmission values (SD) for BW, IC and PM exposures were as follows: 1.78% (1.15%), 0.639% (0.63%) and 2.60% (0.98%). The differences between PM and IC and between BW and IC were significant (p > 0.01). The differences between exposure side, gender and age were not significant. The reference transmission value, which was calculated from the highest mean transmission percentage for PM (2.60%) plus twice the SD (0.98%) and rounding up, was 5%.
CONCLUSIONS: : A transmission factor of 5% could be used to assess the remnant beam during intra-oral radiography. Anterior exposures led to significantly lower transmission values than posterior exposures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30182743      PMCID: PMC6196065          DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20180205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  7 in total

1.  X-ray protection in the dental office.

Authors:  A G RICHARDS; R J NELSEN; G M FTTZGERALD; S S WALD; H D SPANGENBERGER
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  1958-04       Impact factor: 3.634

2.  Effective dose equivalent to the operator in intra-oral dental radiography.

Authors:  R A de Haan; J van Aken
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2007

4.  Distribution of scattered radiation during intraoral radiography with the patient in supine position.

Authors:  K Kuroyanagi; Y Hayakawa; H Fujimori; T Sugiyama
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  1998-06

5.  Ambient dose during intraoral radiography with current techniques: Part 1 conversion factor for scattered radiation using a rectangular collimator.

Authors:  Reinier C Hoogeveen; Tyrell I de Randamie; Gianni M Soemodihardjo; Wer Berkhout
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Radiation isoexposure curves about a dental chair during radiography.

Authors:  J W Rolofson; A Hamel; H F Stewart
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  1969-02       Impact factor: 3.634

7.  The tissue-equivalence of the Alderson Rando anthropomorphic phantom for x-rays of diagnostic qualities.

Authors:  P C Shrimpton; B F Wall; E S Fisher
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 3.609

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Ambient dose during intraoral radiography with current techniques: part 3: effect of tube voltage.

Authors:  Reinier Cornelis Hoogeveen; Dirk van Beest; Erwin Berkhout
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 2.419

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.