Literature DB >> 33180551

Ambient dose during intraoral radiography with current techniques: part 3: effect of tube voltage.

Reinier Cornelis Hoogeveen1, Dirk van Beest1, Erwin Berkhout1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to assess the impact of tube voltage on ambient dose during intraoral radiography, specifically remnant-beam transmission and scattered radiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Remnant-beam and scattered radiation doses were recorded using a phantom at tube voltages of 60, 63, 66 and 70 kV. Mathematical equations depicting their relations were then formulated, and reference values were calculated at the various voltages tested. Total ambient doses per exposure at 60 kV and at 70 kV were compared.
RESULTS: Both remnant-beam transmission and scattered radiation increased ~40% by increasing tube voltage from 60 kV to 70 kV, and the relation was linear. A remnant beam transmission reference value of 7.5% was established at 70 kV, as well as a conversion factor of 0.035 µSv/mAs at 1 m for scattered radiation at 60 kV. Given longer exposure times at 60 kV, total ambient dose proved higher at 60 kV than at 70 kV.
CONCLUSION: Higher tube voltage results in higher remnant-beam transmission and more scattered radiation per workload. The relation is linear in the range between 60kV and 70 kV. Remnant-beam transmission at 70 kV is safely assessed at 7.5%. A conversion factor at 60 kV of 0.035 µSv/mAs at 1 m for the scattered radiation dose can be proposed. Total ambient dose per exposure was higher at 60kV than at 70 kV.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dental equipment; Dental radiography; Radiation monitoring; Radiation protection

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33180551      PMCID: PMC8077998          DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20190362

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  9 in total

1.  Secondary radiation and the dentist.

Authors:  A G RICHARDS
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  1958-07       Impact factor: 3.634

2.  Effective dose equivalent to the operator in intra-oral dental radiography.

Authors:  R A de Haan; J van Aken
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  1991

4.  Distribution of scattered radiation during intraoral radiography with the patient in supine position.

Authors:  K Kuroyanagi; Y Hayakawa; H Fujimori; T Sugiyama
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  1998-06

5.  Evaluation of mean conversion coefficients from air-kerma to H *(10) using secondary and transmitted x-ray spectra in the diagnostic radiology energy range.

Authors:  A H Lopez Gonzales; J C Santos; L Mariano; A Tomal; P R Costa
Journal:  J Radiol Prot       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 1.394

6.  Digital dental radiology in Belgium: a nationwide survey.

Authors:  Robin Snel; Ellen Van De Maele; Constantinus Politis; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 2.419

7.  Ambient dose during intraoral radiography with current techniques: Part 1 conversion factor for scattered radiation using a rectangular collimator.

Authors:  Reinier C Hoogeveen; Tyrell I de Randamie; Gianni M Soemodihardjo; Wer Berkhout
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  Radiation isoexposure curves about a dental chair during radiography.

Authors:  J W Rolofson; A Hamel; H F Stewart
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  1969-02       Impact factor: 3.634

9.  Ambient dose during intra-oral radiography with current techniques: Part 2 quantifying the remnant beam - an in vivo study.

Authors:  Reinier C Hoogeveen; Christine Ch Pfältzer; Wer Berkhout
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 2.419

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.