Literature DB >> 30182307

Dimensions of the spinous process and interspinous space: a morphometric study.

Guang-Xun Lin1, Tsz-King Suen1, Javier Quillo-Olvera1, Kutbuddin Akbary1, Jung-Woo Hur1, Eun Kim1, Eun-Jin Park1, Jin-Sung Kim2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To measure the morphological dimensions of the spinous process (SP) and interspinous space, and provide a basis for the development of interspinous devices for the Korean or East Asian populations.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the anatomical parameters of 120 patients. The parameters included height, length, and width of SP, interspinous distance (supine, standing, and dynamic), cortical thickness of SP, and spino-laminar (S-L) angle. Correlations between measurements, age, and gender were investigated.
RESULTS: The largest height, length, and cortical thickness and S-L angle were noted at L3. The largest width was observed at S1. The interspinous distance decreased significantly from L2-3 to L5-S1 and was significantly larger in the supine than in standing posture for L5-S1. Cortical thickness was gradually tapered from the anterior to the posterior position. The S-L angle at L2 and L3 was similar and significantly decreased from L3 to S1. An increased trend in width with aging and a decreased trend in distance (supine) were noted. A significant increase in height, length, and distance in males compared with females was also observed.
CONCLUSIONS: The interspinous space is wider at the anterior, and the cortex is thicker anteriorly. Accordingly, it appears that the optimized implant position lies in the interspinous space anteriorly. The varying interspinous space with different postures and gradually narrowing with age suggest the need for caution when sizing the device. Gender differences also need to be considered when designing implantable devices.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cortical thickness; Interspinous space; Morphometry; Spino-laminar angle; Spinous process

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30182307     DOI: 10.1007/s00276-018-2096-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat        ISSN: 0930-1038            Impact factor:   1.246


  27 in total

1.  Preliminary results of a soft novel lumbar intervertebral prothesis (DIAM) in the degenerative spinal pathology.

Authors:  A Mariottini; S Pieri; S Giachi; B Carangelo; A Zalaffi; F V Muzii; L Palma
Journal:  Acta Neurochir Suppl       Date:  2005

Review 2.  Interspinous process devices in the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Christopher M Bono; Alexander R Vaccaro
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2007-05

3.  Interspinous spacer decompression (X-STOP) for lumbar spinal stenosis and degenerative disk disease: a multicenter study with a minimum 3-year follow-up.

Authors:  Fabrizio Puzzilli; Roberto Gazzeri; Marcelo Galarza; Massimiliano Neroni; Konstantinos Panagiotopoulos; Andrea Bolognini; Giorgio Callovini; Umberto Agrillo; Alex Alfieri
Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 1.876

Review 4.  Management of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Jon Lurie; Christy Tomkins-Lane
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-01-04

5.  The treatment mechanism of an interspinous process implant for lumbar neurogenic intermittent claudication.

Authors:  Joshua C Richards; Sharmila Majumdar; Derek P Lindsey; Gary S Beaupré; Scott A Yerby
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 6.  Interspinous implants to treat spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Raj J Gala; Glenn S Russo; Peter G Whang
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2017-06

7.  Comparative Analysis of Inpatient and Outpatient Interspinous Process Device Placement for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

Authors:  Alicia Ortega; J Manuel Sarmiento; Chirag Patil; Debraj Mukherjee; Beatrice Ugiliweneza; Miriam Nuño; Shivanand Lad; Maxwell Boakye
Journal:  J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 1.268

8.  Interspinous process spacers versus traditional decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kevin Phan; Prashanth J Rao; Jonathon R Ball; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-03

Review 9.  Interspinous process spacers.

Authors:  David H Kim; Todd J Albert
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.020

10.  Long-term results with percutaneous interspinous process devices in the treatment of neurogenic intermittent claudication.

Authors:  Patrick Fransen
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-12
View more
  2 in total

1.  Spinous Process Inclination in Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Individuals.

Authors:  Janan Abbas; Natan Peled; Israel Hershkovitz; Kamal Hamoud
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  A Radiological Evaluation of Lumbar Spinous Processes and Interspinous Spaces, Including Clinical Implications.

Authors:  Dicle Kaya Ayvaz; Piraye Kervancıoğlu; Ayşe Bahşi; İlhan Bahşi
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-11-10
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.