Literature DB >> 17426291

Interspinous process spacers.

David H Kim1, Todd J Albert.   

Abstract

The patient with neurogenic claudication resulting from lumbar spinal stenosis who fails to experience satisfactory relief from nonsurgical measures has limited treatment options. Lumbar epidural steroid injections and surgical laminectomy are generally accepted alternatives for the patient with moderate to severe symptoms. Interspinous process spacers, a relatively new class of technology, are proposed for use in the patient who prefers less invasive surgery or in whom medical comorbidities preclude a major surgical procedure. Early data from biomechanical and clinical studies support the short-term efficacy of interspinous process spacers in treating claudication related to spinal stenosis. Sufficient medium- and long-term data are lacking, however, particularly with respect to durability of symptomatic relief and the risk of device migration or dislocation. Although interspinous process spacers are a promising new technology, the results of longer-term clinical follow-up studies are needed to more clearly define their role in the management of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17426291     DOI: 10.5435/00124635-200704000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg        ISSN: 1067-151X            Impact factor:   3.020


  16 in total

Review 1.  Role of lumbar interspinous distraction on the neural elements.

Authors:  Alex Alfieri; Roberto Gazzeri; Julian Prell; Christian Scheller; Jens Rachinger; Christian Strauss; Andreas Schwarz
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  [Long-term results, status of studies and differential indication regarding the DIAM implant].

Authors:  F A Krappel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  [Treatment of dynamic spinal canal stenosis with an interspinous spacer].

Authors:  Christoph J Siepe; Franziska Heider; Rudolf Beisse; H Michael Mayer; Andreas Korge
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.154

4.  In vivo range of motion of the lumbar spinous processes.

Authors:  Qun Xia; Shaobai Wang; Peter G Passias; Michal Kozanek; Gang Li; Brian E Grottkau; Kirkham B Wood; Guoan Li
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-06-19       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  An anatomic study of the interspinous space of the lumbosacral spine.

Authors:  John S Albietz; Patricia Rosasarellano; Jennifer C Fleming; Kevin R Gurr; Stewart I Bailey; Christopher S Bailey
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Dimensions of the spinous process and interspinous space: a morphometric study.

Authors:  Guang-Xun Lin; Tsz-King Suen; Javier Quillo-Olvera; Kutbuddin Akbary; Jung-Woo Hur; Eun Kim; Eun-Jin Park; Jin-Sung Kim
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 1.246

7.  Development of percutaneously insertable/removable interspinous process spacer for treatment of posture-dependent lumbar spinal-canal stenosis: preclinical feasibility study using porcine model.

Authors:  Kotaro Nishida; Minoru Doita; Kenichiro Kakutani; Koichiro Maeno; Takashi Yurube; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Biomechanical analysis of a new lumbar interspinous device with optimized topology.

Authors:  Chen-Sheng Chen; Shih-Liang Shih
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 2.602

9.  The clinical effect of gait load test in two level lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Youn-Soo Kim; Sung-Jin Park; In-Soo Oh; Jae-Young Kwan
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2009-12-31

Review 10.  Lumbar spinal stenosis: syndrome, diagnostics and treatment.

Authors:  Eberhard Siebert; Harald Prüss; Randolf Klingebiel; Vieri Failli; Karl M Einhäupl; Jan M Schwab
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 42.937

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.