Literature DB >> 30181203

A Randomized Trial to Compare a Tailored Web-Based Intervention and Tailored Phone Counseling to Usual Care for Increasing Colorectal Cancer Screening.

Victoria L Champion1,2, Shannon M Christy3,4, William Rakowski5, Wambui G Gathirua-Mwangi6, Will L Tarver7, Lisa Carter-Harris6,2, Andrea A Cohee6,2, Andrew R Marley8, Nenette M Jessup6, Erika Biederman6, Carla D Kettler9, Timothy E Stump9, Patrick Monahan2,9, David R Lairson10, Susan M Rawl6,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer mortality could be decreased with risk-appropriate cancer screening. We examined the efficacy of three tailored interventions compared with usual care for increasing screening adherence.
METHODS: Women (n = 1,196) ages 51 to 74, from primary care networks and nonadherent to colorectal cancer guidelines, were randomized to (1) usual care, (2) tailored Web intervention, (3) tailored phone intervention, or (4) tailored Web + phone intervention. Average-risk women could select either stool test or colonoscopy, whereas women considered at higher than average risk received an intervention that supported colonoscopy. Outcome data were collected at 6 months by self-report, followed by medical record confirmation (attrition of 23%). Stage of change for colorectal cancer screening (precontemplation or contemplation) was assessed at baseline and 6 months.
RESULTS: The phone (41.7%, P < 0.0001) and combined Web + phone (35.8%, P < 0.001) interventions significantly increased colorectal cancer screening by stool test compared with usual care (11.1%), with ORs ranging from 5.4 to 6.8 in models adjusted for covariates. Colonoscopy completion did not differ between groups except that phone significantly increased colonoscopy completion compared with usual care for participants in the highest tertile of self-reported fear of cancer.
CONCLUSIONS: A tailored phone with or without a Web component significantly increased colorectal cancer screening compared with usual care, primarily through stool testing, and phone significantly increased colonoscopy compared with usual care but only among those with the highest levels of baseline fear. IMPACT: This study supports tailored phone counseling with or without a Web program for increasing colorectal cancer screening in average-risk women. ©2018 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30181203      PMCID: PMC7092638          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-0180

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  41 in total

1.  Adherence to colorectal cancer screening in an HMO population.

Authors:  R E Myers; B J Trock; C Lerman; T Wolf; E Ross; P F Engstrom
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 4.018

2.  The knowledge and use of screening tests for colorectal and prostate cancer: data from the 1987 National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  M L Brown; A L Potosky; G B Thompson; L G Kessler
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 3.  A systematic review of randomized trials on the effectiveness of computer-tailored education on physical activity and dietary behaviors.

Authors:  Willemieke Kroeze; Andrea Werkman; Johannes Brug
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2006-06

4.  Why you should care about screening flexible sigmoidoscopy.

Authors:  John M Inadomi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  A randomized trial comparing the effect of two phone-based interventions on colorectal cancer screening adherence.

Authors:  Usha Menon; Rhonda Belue; Stéphanie Wahab; Kathryn Rugen; Anita Y Kinney; Peter Maramaldi; Debra Wujcik; Laura A Szalacha
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2011-12

6.  Factors affecting compliance with screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  P A Farrands; J D Hardcastle; J Chamberlain; S Moss
Journal:  Community Med       Date:  1984-02

7.  Information processes mediate the effect of a health communication intervention on fruit and vegetable consumption.

Authors:  Linda K Ko; Marci K Campbell; Megan A Lewis; Jo Anne Earp; Brenda Devellis
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2011-03

8.  Prostate cancer: perceptions of African-American males.

Authors:  J H Price; T L Colvin; D Smith
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 1.798

9.  Effects of tailored knowledge enhancement on colorectal cancer screening preference across ethnic and language groups.

Authors:  Anthony Jerant; Richard L Kravitz; Kevin Fiscella; Nancy Sohler; Raquel Lozano Romero; Bennett Parnes; Sergio Aguilar-Gaxiola; Charles Turner; Simon Dvorak; Peter Franks
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2012-09-15

10.  Computer-delivered tailored intervention improves colon cancer screening knowledge and health beliefs of African-Americans.

Authors:  Susan M Rawl; Celette Sugg Skinner; Susan M Perkins; Jeffrey Springston; Hsiao-Lan Wang; Kathleen M Russell; Yan Tong; Netsanet Gebregziabher; Connie Krier; Esther Smith-Howell; Tawana Brady-Watts; Laura J Myers; Deborah Ballard; Broderick Rhyant; Deanna R Willis; Thomas F Imperiale; Victoria L Champion
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2012-08-27
View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  The changing landscape of cancer in the USA - opportunities for advancing prevention and treatment.

Authors:  Farhad Islami; Rebecca L Siegel; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Impact of Tailored Interventions on Receipt of a Preference-Concordant Colorectal Cancer Screening Test.

Authors:  Shannon M Christy; Patrick O Monahan; Timothy E Stump; Susan M Rawl; Victoria L Champion
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2019-12-07       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  Computer-tailored intervention increases colorectal cancer screening among low-income African Americans in primary care: Results of a randomized trial.

Authors:  Susan M Rawl; Shannon M Christy; Susan M Perkins; Yan Tong; Connie Krier; Hsiao-Lan Wang; Amelia M Huang; Esther Laury; Broderick Rhyant; Frank Lloyd; Deanna R Willis; Thomas F Imperiale; Laura J Myers; Jeffrey Springston; Celette Sugg Skinner; Victoria L Champion
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  A stepped randomized trial to promote colorectal cancer screening in a nationwide sample of U.S. Veterans.

Authors:  Sally W Vernon; Deborah J Del Junco; Sharon P Coan; Caitlin C Murphy; Scott T Walters; Robert H Friedman; Lori A Bastian; Deborah A Fisher; David R Lairson; Ronald E Myers
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2021-04-03       Impact factor: 2.261

5.  Cross-sectional adherence with the multi-target stool DNA test for colorectal cancer screening: Real-world data from a large cohort of older adults.

Authors:  Emily Weiser; Philip D Parks; Rebecca K Swartz; Jack Van Thomme; Philip T Lavin; Paul Limburg; Barry M Berger
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 2.136

6.  Cross-sectional adherence with the multi-target stool DNA test for colorectal cancer screening in a large, nationally insured cohort.

Authors:  Lesley-Ann Miller-Wilson; Lila J Finney Rutten; Jack Van Thomme; A Burak Ozbay; Paul J Limburg
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Motivational Interviewing to Improve the Uptake of Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Novia Niannian Long; Michele Petrova Xin Ling Lau; Ainsley Ryan Yan Bin Lee; Natalie Elizabeth Yam; Nicholas Ye Kai Koh; Cyrus Su Hui Ho
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-04-26

8.  Development of a Computer-Tailored Intervention/Decision Aid To Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening in Health Systems.

Authors:  Hala Fatima; Maryiam Wajid; Connie Krier; Victoria Champion; Lisa Carter-Harris; Rivienne Shedd-Steele; Thomas F Imperiale; Peter Schwartz; Sylvia Strom; Mark Magnarella; Susan M Rawl
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-03-21

9.  Economic Evaluation of Tailored Web versus Tailored Telephone-Based Interventions to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening among Women.

Authors:  David R Lairson; Tong Han Chung; Danmeng Huang; Timothy E Stump; Patrick O Monahan; Shannon M Christy; Susan M Rawl; Victoria L Champion
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2020-01-22

10.  An RCT to Increase Breast and Colorectal Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Victoria L Champion; Shannon M Christy; William Rakowski; David R Lairson; Patrick O Monahan; Wambui G Gathirua-Mwangi; Timothy E Stump; Erika B Biederman; Carla D Kettler; Susan M Rawl
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 5.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.