Literature DB >> 21826576

A randomized trial comparing the effect of two phone-based interventions on colorectal cancer screening adherence.

Usha Menon1, Rhonda Belue, Stéphanie Wahab, Kathryn Rugen, Anita Y Kinney, Peter Maramaldi, Debra Wujcik, Laura A Szalacha.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Early-stage diagnosis of colorectal cancer is associated with high survival rates; screening prevalence, however, remains suboptimal.
PURPOSE: This study seeks to test the hypothesis that participants receiving telephone-based tailored education or motivational interviewing had higher colorectal cancer screening completion rates compared to usual care.
METHODS: Primary care patients not adherent with colorectal cancer screening and with no personal or family history of cancer (n = 515) were assigned by block randomization to control (n = 169), tailored education (n = 168), or motivational interview (n = 178). The response rate was 70%; attrition was 24%.
RESULTS: Highest screening occurred in the tailored education group (23.8%, p < .02); participants had 2.2 times the odds of completing a post-intervention colorectal cancer screening than did the control group (AOR = 2.2, CI = 1.2-4.0). Motivational interviewing was not associated with significant increase in post-intervention screening.
CONCLUSIONS: Tailored education showed promise as a feasible strategy to increase colorectal cancer screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21826576      PMCID: PMC3232176          DOI: 10.1007/s12160-011-9291-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Behav Med        ISSN: 0883-6612


  41 in total

1.  The Next Step Trial: impact of a worksite colorectal cancer screening promotion program.

Authors:  B C Tilley; S W Vernon; R Myers; K Glanz; M Lu; K Hirst; A R Kristal
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.018

2.  Enhancing treatment fidelity in health behavior change studies: best practices and recommendations from the NIH Behavior Change Consortium.

Authors:  Albert J Bellg; Belinda Borrelli; Barbara Resnick; Jacki Hecht; Daryl Sharp Minicucci; Marcia Ory; Gbenga Ogedegbe; Denise Orwig; Denise Ernst; Susan Czajkowski
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.267

3.  The efficacy of tailored print materials in promoting colorectal cancer screening: results from a randomized trial involving callers to the National Cancer Institute's Cancer Information Service.

Authors:  Alfred C Marcus; Mondi Mason; Pam Wolfe; Barbara K Rimer; Isaac Lipkus; Victor Strecher; Richard Warneke; Marion E Morra; Amy Reasinger Allen; Sharon W Davis; Amy Gaier; Carlan Graves; Karen Julesberg; Lynne Nguyen; Rosemarie Perocchia; Jo Beth Speyer; Doug Wagner; Chris Thomsen; Mary Anne Bright
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2005

4.  Screening HMO women overdue for both mammograms and pap tests.

Authors:  Barbara G Valanis; Russell E Glasgow; John Mullooly; Thomas M Vogt; Evelyn P Whitlock; Shawn M Boles; K Sabina Smith; Teresa M Kimes
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Use of a patient navigator to increase colorectal cancer screening in an urban neighborhood health clinic.

Authors:  Lina Jandorf; Yahaira Gutierrez; Jaime Lopez; Jennifer Christie; Steven H Itzkowitz
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2005-05-11       Impact factor: 3.671

6.  Health care provider-directed intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening among veterans: results of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  M Rosario Ferreira; Nancy C Dolan; Marian L Fitzgibbon; Terry C Davis; Nicolle Gorby; Lisa Ladewski; Dachao Liu; Alfred W Rademaker; Franklin Medio; Brian P Schmitt; Charles L Bennett
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-03-01       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Promoting culturally appropriate colorectal cancer screening through a health educator: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Shin-Ping Tu; Vicky Taylor; Yutaka Yasui; Alan Chun; Mei-Po Yip; Elizabeth Acorda; Lin Li; Roshan Bastani
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Telephone care management to improve cancer screening among low-income women: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Allen J Dietrich; Jonathan N Tobin; Andrea Cassells; Christina M Robinson; Mary Ann Greene; Carol Hill Sox; Michael L Beach; Katherine N DuHamel; Richard G Younge
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Interventions fail to increase cancer screening rates in community-based primary care practices.

Authors:  Mack T Ruffin; Daniel W Gorenflo
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.018

10.  Beliefs associated with fecal occult blood test and colonoscopy use at a worksite colon cancer screening program.

Authors:  Usha Menon; Victoria L Champion; Gregory N Larkin; Terrell W Zollinger; Priscilla M Gerde; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.162

View more
  29 in total

1.  Patient activation increases colorectal cancer screening rates: a randomized trial among low-income minority patients.

Authors:  Mira L Katz; James L Fisher; Kelly Fleming; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  A Multistate Asian-Language Tobacco Quitline: Addressing a Disparity in Access to Care.

Authors:  Sharon E Cummins; Shiushing Wong; Erika Bonnevie; Hye-Ryeon Lee; Cynthia J Goto; Judy McCree Carrington; Carrie Kirby; Shu-Hong Zhu
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  A framework for evaluating the cost-effectiveness of patient decision aids: A case study using colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Scott B Cantor; Tanya Rajan; Suzanne K Linder; Robert J Volk
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  Sociopsychological tailoring to address colorectal cancer screening disparities: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Anthony Jerant; Richard L Kravitz; Nancy Sohler; Kevin Fiscella; Raquel L Romero; Bennett Parnes; Daniel J Tancredi; Sergio Aguilar-Gaxiola; Christina Slee; Simon Dvorak; Charles Turner; Andrew Hudnut; Francisco Prieto; Peter Franks
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2014 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 5.  Motivational interviewing to improve health screening uptake: A systematic review.

Authors:  Sarah J Miller; Kelly Foran-Tuller; Jessica Ledergerber; Lina Jandorf
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2016-08-26

6.  Evaluation of Interventions Intended to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael K Dougherty; Alison T Brenner; Seth D Crockett; Shivani Gupta; Stephanie B Wheeler; Manny Coker-Schwimmer; Laura Cubillos; Teri Malo; Daniel S Reuland
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 21.873

7.  Tailored telephone counseling increases colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Susan M Rawl; Shannon M Christy; Patrick O Monahan; Yan Ding; Connie Krier; Victoria L Champion; Douglas Rex
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2015-05-28

8.  Aid-assisted decision making and colorectal cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Paul C Schroy; Karen M Emmons; Ellen Peters; Julie T Glick; Patricia A Robinson; Maria A Lydotes; Shamini R Mylvaganam; Alison M Coe; Clara A Chen; Christine E Chaisson; Michael P Pignone; Marianne N Prout; Peter K Davidson; Timothy C Heeren
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.043

9.  Family Ties: The Role of Family Context in Family Health History Communication About Cancer.

Authors:  Vivian M Rodríguez; Rosalie Corona; Joann N Bodurtha; John M Quillin
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2016-01-06

Review 10.  Toward an Emerging Role for Motivational Interviewing in Primary Care.

Authors:  Robert Keeley; Matthew Engel; Alex Reed; David Brody; Brian L Burke
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 5.285

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.