Literature DB >> 33549682

Computer-tailored intervention increases colorectal cancer screening among low-income African Americans in primary care: Results of a randomized trial.

Susan M Rawl1, Shannon M Christy2, Susan M Perkins3, Yan Tong4, Connie Krier5, Hsiao-Lan Wang6, Amelia M Huang4, Esther Laury7, Broderick Rhyant4, Frank Lloyd4, Deanna R Willis4, Thomas F Imperiale8, Laura J Myers8, Jeffrey Springston9, Celette Sugg Skinner10, Victoria L Champion11.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Although African Americans have the highest colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality rates of any racial group, their screening rates remain low. STUDY DESIGN/
PURPOSE: This randomized controlled trial compared efficacy of two clinic-based interventions for increasing CRC screening among African American primary care patients.
METHODS: African American patients from 11 clinics who were not current with CRC screening were randomized to receive a computer-tailored intervention (n = 335) or a non-tailored brochure (n = 358) designed to promote adherence to CRC screening. Interventions were delivered in clinic immediately prior to a provider visit. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models analyzed predictors of screening test completion. Moderators and mediators were determined using multivariable linear and logistic regression analyses.
RESULTS: Significant effects of the computer-tailored intervention were observed for completion of a stool blood test (SBT) and completion of any CRC screening test (SBT or colonoscopy). The colonoscopy screening rate was higher among those receiving the computer-tailored intervention group compared to the nontailored brochure but the difference was not significant. Predictors of SBT completion were: receipt of the computer-tailored intervention; being seen at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center clinic; baseline stage of adoption; and reason for visit. Mediators of intervention effects were changes in perceived SBT barriers, changes in perceived colonoscopy benefits, changes in CRC knowledge, and patient-provider discussion. Moderators of intervention effects were age, employment, and family/friend recommendation of screening.
CONCLUSION: This one-time computer-tailored intervention significantly improved CRC screening rates among low-income African American patients. This finding was largely driven by increasing SBT but the impact of the intervention on colonoscopy screening was strong. Implementation of a CRC screening quality improvement program in the VA site that included provision of stool blood test kits and follow-up likely contributed to the strong intervention effect observed at that site. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT00672828.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal cancer; Computer-tailored intervention; Randomized trial; Screening; Tailored intervention

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33549682      PMCID: PMC8091507          DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106449

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  46 in total

1.  Effects of a tailored interactive multimedia computer program on determinants of colorectal cancer screening: a randomized controlled pilot study in physician offices.

Authors:  Anthony Jerant; Richard L Kravitz; Mairin Rooney; Scott Amerson; Matthew Kreuter; Peter Franks
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2006-12-06

2.  The effects of tailoring knowledge acquisition on colorectal cancer screening self-efficacy.

Authors:  Anthony Jerant; Patricia To; Peter Franks
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2015-04-30

3.  Colorectal cancer screening among ethnically diverse, low-income patients: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Karen E Lasser; Jennifer Murillo; Sandra Lisboa; A Naomie Casimir; Lisa Valley-Shah; Karen M Emmons; Robert H Fletcher; John Z Ayanian
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2011-05-23

4.  Using a Culturally Tailored Intervention to Increase Colorectal Cancer Knowledge and Screening among Hispanics in a Rural Community.

Authors:  Katherine J Briant; Janeth I Sanchez; Genoveva Ibarra; Monica Escareño; Nora E Gonzalez; Virginia Jimenez Gonzalez; Nathan Marchello; Stephanie Louie; Beti Thompson
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Telephone care management to improve cancer screening among low-income women: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Allen J Dietrich; Jonathan N Tobin; Andrea Cassells; Christina M Robinson; Mary Ann Greene; Carol Hill Sox; Michael L Beach; Katherine N DuHamel; Richard G Younge
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 6.  Tailored information about cancer risk and screening: a systematic review.

Authors:  Akke Albada; Margreet G E M Ausems; Jozien M Bensing; Sandra van Dulmen
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2009-04-18

7.  Impact of Risk Assessment and Tailored versus Nontailored Risk Information on Colorectal Cancer Testing in Primary Care: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Celette Sugg Skinner; Ethan A Halm; Wendy Pechero Bishop; Chul Ahn; Samir Gupta; David Farrell; Jay Morrow; Manjula Julka; Katharine McCallister; Joanne M Sanders; Emily Marks; Susan M Rawl
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  An automated intervention with stepped increases in support to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Beverly B Green; Ching-Yun Wang; Melissa L Anderson; Jessica Chubak; Richard T Meenan; Sally W Vernon; Sharon Fuller
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  A Randomized Trial to Compare a Tailored Web-Based Intervention and Tailored Phone Counseling to Usual Care for Increasing Colorectal Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Victoria L Champion; Shannon M Christy; William Rakowski; Wambui G Gathirua-Mwangi; Will L Tarver; Lisa Carter-Harris; Andrea A Cohee; Andrew R Marley; Nenette M Jessup; Erika Biederman; Carla D Kettler; Timothy E Stump; Patrick Monahan; David R Lairson; Susan M Rawl
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Systematic Review of Interventions to Increase Stool Blood Colorectal Cancer Screening in African Americans.

Authors:  Siddhartha Roy; Sabrina Dickey; Hsiao-Lan Wang; Alexandria Washington; Randy Polo; Clement K Gwede; John S Luque
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2021-02
View more
  3 in total

1.  Partnering to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening: Perspectives of Community Advisory Board Members.

Authors:  Susan M Rawl; Sandra Bailey; Beatrice Cork; Matthew Fields; Thomas Griffin; Laura Haunert; Judy Kline; Connie Krier; Juan Lagunes; Ruth L Lambert; Caeli Malloy; Jack Quick; Rivienne Shedd-Steele; Sylvia Strom; Lisa Carter-Harris
Journal:  West J Nurs Res       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 1.967

2.  Communicating risk to promote colorectal cancer screening: a multi-method study to test tailored versus targeted message strategies.

Authors:  Jordan M Neil; Naomi D Parker; Yulia A Levites Strekalova; Kyle Duke; Thomas George; Janice L Krieger
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2022-03-24

3.  Development of a Computer-Tailored Intervention/Decision Aid To Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening in Health Systems.

Authors:  Hala Fatima; Maryiam Wajid; Connie Krier; Victoria Champion; Lisa Carter-Harris; Rivienne Shedd-Steele; Thomas F Imperiale; Peter Schwartz; Sylvia Strom; Mark Magnarella; Susan M Rawl
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-03-21
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.