Literature DB >> 31814511

Impact of Tailored Interventions on Receipt of a Preference-Concordant Colorectal Cancer Screening Test.

Shannon M Christy1,2,3, Patrick O Monahan4,5, Timothy E Stump6, Susan M Rawl5,7, Victoria L Champion5,8.   

Abstract

Background. Individuals at average risk for colorectal cancer (CRC) have multiple test options. Preference for a specific test modality may affect decision making about CRC screening. The current study examined 1) the sociodemographic and health belief characteristics of average-risk participants with a test preference for stool blood test (SBT) versus those with a preference of colonoscopy, and following receipt of a tailored CRC screening intervention, 2) the percentage of participants who completed a preference-concordant CRC screening test, and 3) the sociodemographic, health care experience, and health belief characteristics and intervention group(s) associated with completion of a preference-concordant screening test. Methods. Participants (N = 603) were female, aged 50 to 75 years, at average CRC risk, not currently up-to-date with CRC screening recommendations, had Internet access, and were randomized to receive 1 of 3 tailored CRC screening promotion interventions. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted. Results. Most women (64%) preferred SBT, whereas 36% preferred colonoscopy. There were significant differences in test preference by age, stage of change for the specific tests, perceived benefits of CRC screening, perceived barriers to both tests, and self-efficacy for colonoscopy. Two hundred thirty participants completed CRC screening at 6 months post-intervention. Of those, most (84%) completed a test concordant with their preference. Multivariable analyses revealed that compared with participants completing a preference-discordant test, those completing a preference-concordant test were older (P = 0.01), had health insurance (P < 0.05), and were in the phone counseling-only group (P < 0.01). Conclusions. High levels of completion of preference-concordant CRC screening can be achieved by educating average-risk patients about the multiple screening test options, soliciting their preferences, and offering testing that is concordant with their preference.

Entities:  

Keywords:  colorectal cancer screening; decision-making; tailored intervention; test preference

Year:  2019        PMID: 31814511      PMCID: PMC6982542          DOI: 10.1177/0272989X19890603

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  14 in total

1.  Importance of fatalism in understanding mammography screening in rural elderly women.

Authors:  R M Mayo; J R Ureda; V G Parker
Journal:  J Women Aging       Date:  2001

2.  A breast cancer fear scale: psychometric development.

Authors:  Victoria L Champion; Celette Sugg Skinner; Usha Menon; Susan Rawl; R Brian Giesler; Patrick Monahan; Joanne Daggy
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  2004-11

3.  Preferences for colorectal cancer screening tests and screening test use in a large multispecialty primary care practice.

Authors:  Sarah T Hawley; Amy McQueen; L Kay Bartholomew; Anthony J Greisinger; Sharon P Coan; Ronald Myers; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  The impact of a novel computer-based decision aid on shared decision making for colorectal cancer screening: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Paul C Schroy; Karen Emmons; Ellen Peters; Julie T Glick; Patricia A Robinson; Maria A Lydotes; Shamini Mylvanaman; Stephen Evans; Christine Chaisson; Michael Pignone; Marianne Prout; Peter Davidson; Timothy C Heeren
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  Understanding current racial/ethnic disparities in colorectal cancer screening in the United States: the contribution of socioeconomic status and access to care.

Authors:  David T Liss; David W Baker
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  Tailored telephone counseling increases colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Susan M Rawl; Shannon M Christy; Patrick O Monahan; Yan Ding; Connie Krier; Victoria L Champion; Douglas Rex
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2015-05-28

7.  Adherence to colorectal cancer screening: a randomized clinical trial of competing strategies.

Authors:  John M Inadomi; Sandeep Vijan; Nancy K Janz; Angela Fagerlin; Jennifer P Thomas; Yunghui V Lin; Roxana Muñoz; Chim Lau; Ma Somsouk; Najwa El-Nachef; Rodney A Hayward
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2012-04-09

8.  Computer-delivered tailored intervention improves colon cancer screening knowledge and health beliefs of African-Americans.

Authors:  Susan M Rawl; Celette Sugg Skinner; Susan M Perkins; Jeffrey Springston; Hsiao-Lan Wang; Kathleen M Russell; Yan Tong; Netsanet Gebregziabher; Connie Krier; Esther Smith-Howell; Tawana Brady-Watts; Laura J Myers; Deborah Ballard; Broderick Rhyant; Deanna R Willis; Thomas F Imperiale; Victoria L Champion
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2012-08-27

9.  Fatalism among elderly African Americans. Effects on colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  B D Powe
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 2.592

10.  Fatalism Revisited: Further Psychometric Testing Across Two Studies.

Authors:  Sue P Heiney; Mary Gullatte; Pearman D Hayne; Barbara Powe; Brian Habing
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2016-08
View more
  1 in total

1.  The impact of cumulative colorectal cancer screening delays: A simulation study.

Authors:  Carolyn M Rutter; John M Inadomi; Christopher E Maerzluft
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 1.687

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.