Literature DB >> 30176102

Bimetallic Nanoparticles in Supported Ionic Liquid Phases as Multifunctional Catalysts for the Selective Hydrodeoxygenation of Aromatic Substrates.

Lisa Offner-Marko1,2, Alexis Bordet1,2,3, Gilles Moos1,2, Simon Tricard3, Simon Rengshausen1,2, Bruno Chaudret3, Kylie L Luska1, Walter Leitner1,2.   

Abstract

Bimetallic pan class="Chemical">iron-ruthenium nanoparticles embedded in an acidic supported ionic liquid phase (FeRu@SILP+IL-SO3 H) act as multifunctional catalysts for the selective hydrodeoxygenation of carbonyl groups in aromatic substrates. The catalyst material is assembled systematically from molecular components to combine the acid and metal sites that allow hydrogenolysis of the C=O bonds without hydrogenation of the aromatic ring. The resulting materials possess high activity and stability for the catalytic hydrodeoxygenation of C=O groups to CH2 units in a variety of substituted aromatic ketones and, hence, provide an effective and benign alternative to traditional Clemmensen and Wolff-Kishner reductions, which require stoichiometric reagents. The molecular design of the FeRu@SILP+IL-SO3 H materials opens a general approach to multifunctional catalytic systems (MM'@SILP+IL-func).
© 2018 The Authors. Published by Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bimetallic nanoparticles; hydrodeoxygenation; iron; ruthenium; supported ionic liquid phases

Year:  2018        PMID: 30176102      PMCID: PMC6175319          DOI: 10.1002/anie.201806638

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl        ISSN: 1433-7851            Impact factor:   15.336


The catalytic hydrodeoxygenation of carbonyl groups to methylene units in the side chains of aromatic substrates has attracted considerable attention for the production of alkyl‐substituted aromatic structures in commodity and fine chemicals.1 It is also considered an important enabler for the deoxygenation of building blocks from lignocellulosic biomass towards value‐added chemicals and tailor‐made fuels.2a–2f However, the large‐scale synthetic application of this transformation has been hindered by the lack of suitable catalysts that allow for selective catalytic hydrodeoxygenation of aromatic ketones without concomitant hydrogenation of the aromatic ring (Scheme 1).3 Stoichiometric methods such as the Clemmensen4 and Wolff–Kishner5 reductions often remain the methods of choice for the removal of carbonyl moieties from aromatic substrates, despite the fact that they rely on the use of toxic reagents and/or create large amounts of undesired and problematic waste.1 Current synthetic pathways involving the hydrodeoxygenation of aromatic substrates cannot fulfill the requirements of high yields, selectivity, stability, productivity, safety, and environmental compatibility.6 Consequently, recent efforts have been devoted to the development of selective hydrodeoxygenation catalysts, typically based on conventional materials for heterogeneous catalysis.7a–7j While promising results have been obtained in some cases for individual substrates, most of the traditional solid catalysts show severe limitations such as low hydrogenation selectivity,8a–8c restriction to only benzylic carbonyl groups,7a–7c low stability,7d–7e formation of side‐products,7f or high catalyst loadings approaching almost stoichiometric amounts of the active metal component.7g
Scheme 1

Selective catalytic hydrodeoxygenation of aromatic carbonyl compounds as a possible route to alkyl‐substituted aromatics, opening new synthetic pathways, for example, from Friedel–Crafts acylation products or lignin derivatives.

Selective catalytic hydrodeoxygenation of aromatic carbonyl compounds as a possible route to alkyl‐substituted pan class="Chemical">aromatics, opening new synthetic pathways, for example, from Friedel–Crafts acylation products or lignin derivatives. In the present paper, we describe the design, preparation, and application of novel bifunctional catalysts for the selective hydrodeoxygenation of aromatic substrates using a molecular approach to assemble the key components of the active materials. The design of the catalyst was based on the analysis of the desired sequence of bond‐breaking and bond‐forming events to achieve the overall transformation, exemplified for benzylideneacetone (1) as a prototypical substrate in Scheme 2. The metal‐catalyzed hydrogenation of the C=C and C=O bond leads to the corresponding alcohol 1 b. Then, the C−O bond is broken through an acid‐catalyzed E1‐ or E2‐type mechanism, resulting in a carbocation or olefin intermediate (only the latter is shown for clarity in Scheme 2). A second metal‐catalyzed hydrogenation leads to butylbenzene (1 d) as the desired product. The catalytic hydrogenation of the aromatic ring must be strictly avoided at each stage. Thus, the challenge for catalyst design was to combine a highly selective metal component for hydrogenation with a sufficiently acidic functionality to facilitate the C−O bond cleavage.
Scheme 2

The complex reaction network to be controlled for selective deoxygenation of aromatic substrates, exemplified for benzylideneacetone (1).

The complex reaction network to be controlled for selective deoxygenation of aromatic substrates, exemplified for pan class="Chemical">benzylideneacetone (1). A recently emerging approach to prepare multifunctional catalytic systems is based on well‐defined metal nanoparticles (NPs) synthesized from organometallic precursors that are embedded in ionic liquid (IL) matrices.9a–9g Herein, we present a version of such materials that combines covalently grafted non‐functionalized IL‐type structures with physisorbed functionalized ILs on silica as support (supported ionic liquid phases, SILPs). This approach allows the controlled formation of NPs on the non‐functionalized SILP and provides a large degree of freedom for post‐modification with the functionalized IL. The resulting materials are denoted as MM′@SILP+IL‐func, in which MM′ defines the metal(s), SILP the covalently grafted IL, and IL‐func the physisorbed IL (e.g., IL‐SO3H for the acidic IL used in this study).10a–10e To address the present synthetic challenge, the combination of bimetallic ironruthenium nanoparticles (FeRu NPs) with an acidic support appeared very promising. Recently, Fe25Ru75 NPs immobilized on a non‐functionalized SILP (Fe25Ru75@SILP) were shown to exhibit high activity for the reduction of C=C, C=O, and C=N groups in substituted aromatic substrates, while preventing the reduction of aromatic moieties.11 Another recent study also outlined a synergistic effect in bimetallic FeRu@SILP catalysts used for the hydrogenation of CO2 to hydrocarbons.12 However, attempts to synthesize Fe25Ru75 NPs on supports in which the acid functions are covalently grafted prior to NP formation (SILP‐SO3H)9e–9g proved unsuccessful owing to the unfavorable interaction of the Fe‐precursor with the acid functionality. The hydrodeoxygenation of 1 with the resulting materials only led to the hydrogenation intermediates 1 a, 1 b, 1 e, and 1 f without exhibiting any deoxygenation activity (see the Supporting Information, Tables S1 and S3 and Figure S1). Preparing Fe25Ru75 NPs on a non‐functionalized SILP and carrying out the transformation in the presence of p‐toluenesulfonic acid (pTsOH) as acidic additive yielded significant amounts of the desired product 1 d, albeit with only low selectivity (1 a:1 b:1 d=36:31:32). Finally, excellent activity and selectivity were obtained using a sulfonic acid‐functionalized imidazolium IL, [BSO3BIM][NTf2] (IL‐SO3H), as acid additive. 1 d was detected by GC essentially as the sole product in the reaction mixture with greater than 99 % yield at full conversion of 1 upon using 2.50 equivalents of IL‐SO3H with regard to the total metal loading (4 mol% relative to 1) within 16 h at 150 °C under H2 (50 bar at RT) (Table S4). Based on these promising results, the controlled preparation of the Fe25Ru75@SILP+IL‐SO3H material sketched in Figure 1 was targeted to ensure an intimate contact between the NPs and the acid moieties in the bifunctional catalyst. The synthesis of Fe25Ru75 NPs immobilized on a non‐functionalized SILP was accomplished using a reported procedure.11 In brief, the NPs were prepared through the in situ reduction of a mesitylene solution of {Fe[N(Si(CH3)3)2]2}2 and [Ru(cod)(cot)] in the presence of the SILP material under an atmosphere of H2 (3 bar) at 150 °C. The oxidation state and alloy extent of the Fe25Ru75 NPs in Fe25Ru75@SILP were previously studied by XANES and EXAFS, evidencing zerovalent Fe and Ru atoms organized in a homophilic bimetallic structure (bimetallic phase with more Fe and Ru homoatomic interactions than in a perfect bimetallic structure).11 The physisorption of IL‐SO3H onto Fe25Ru75@SILP to prepare the bifunctional catalyst (Fe25Ru75@SILP+IL‐SO3H) was achieved by stirring a suspension of Fe25Ru75@SILP and IL‐SO3H in acetone at RT.
Figure 1

Schematic of iron–ruthenium nanoparticles immobilized on a sulfonic acid‐functionalized supported ionic liquid phase (Fe25Ru75@SILP+IL‐SO3H) as a bifunctional catalyst for the hydrodeoxygenation of carbonyl‐substituted aromatic substrates.

Schematic of ironpan class="Chemical">ruthenium nanoparticles immobilized on a sulfonic acid‐functionalized supported ionic liquid phase (Fe25Ru75@SILP+IL‐SO3H) as a bifunctional catalyst for the hydrodeoxygenation of carbonyl‐substituted aromatic substrates. As expected, the surface area and the pore volume were significantly reduced upon physisorption of the IL‐SO3H on Fe25Ru75@SILP according to BET analysis. These data are in good agreement with a pore‐filling degree (or α factor) of 0.7. Detailed analysis by TEM showed that the size of the metal nanoparticles (2.9 nm) did not change significantly upon physisorption; however, the NPs were less homogeneously dispersed across the support than before. STEM/EDS elemental mapping evidenced a clear correlation between sulfur and metal concentration, with higher sulfur content (ca. 2‐fold) in zones containing NPs as compared to zones without NPs. This observation indicates a preference of the NPs to accumulate in areas with large amounts of physisorbed IL‐SO3H. STEM/EDS elemental mapping and SEM/EDS demonstrated that, despite this noticeable redistribution, the NPs still contain both Fe and Ru (Figure 2) in an unaffected metal ratio (see the Supporting Information, Table S2 and Figures S2, S3, and S5, for complete characterization details).
Figure 2

Scanning transmission electron microscopy with energy dispersive X‐ray spectroscopy (STEM/EDS) elemental mappings of Fe25Ru75@SILP+IL‐SO3H. a) STEM‐HAADF image of Fe25Ru75@SILP+IL‐SO3H, b) S, c) Fe, and d) Ru.

Scanning transmission electron microscopy with energy dispersive X‐ray spectroscopy (STEM/EDS) elemental mappings of Fe25Ru75@SILP+IL‐SO3H. a) STEM‐HAADF image of Fe25Ru75@SILP+IL‐SO3H, b) S, c) Fe, and d) Ru. These results indicate that the physisorption of the acidic ionic liquid onto Fe25Ru75@SILP did not afpan class="Chemical">fect the integrity of the Fe25Ru75 NPs (size, metal ratio). These data substantiate the conclusion that Fe25Ru75 NPs retain their oxidation state and alloy structure after physisorption of the acidic ionic liquid and consist of zerovalent Fe and Ru atoms organized in a homophilic bimetallic structure. The reaction profile for the hydrodeoxygenation of benzylideneacetone (1) catalyzed by pan class="Chemical">Fe25Ru75@SILP+IL‐SO3H is shown in Figure 3. A mixture of hydrogenation intermediates 1 a and 1 b (58 %) and the deoxygenation product 1 d (42 %) was formed already after 1 h. As the reaction progressed, the hydrogenation intermediates, 1 a and 1 b, were gradually consumed and an almost quantitative yield of 1 d was obtained after 12 h. During the entire reaction sequence, no species resulting from the hydrogenation of the aromatic moiety were observed.
Figure 3

Reaction profile for the hydrodeoxygenation of benzylideneacetone (1) using Fe25Ru75@SILP+IL‐SO3H. Reaction conditions: Fe25Ru75@SILP+IL‐SO3H (58 mg of catalyst containing 0.015 mmol total metal and 0.038 mmol (2.50 equiv.) IL‐SO3H), substrate (0.38 mmol), mesitylene (0.5 mL), H2 (50 bar), 150 °C. Conversion and product distribution were determined by GC using tetradecane as an internal standard.

Reaction profile for the hydrodeoxygenation of benzylideneacetone (1) using pan class="Chemical">Fe25Ru75@SILP+IL‐SO3H. Reaction conditions: Fe25Ru75@SILP+IL‐SO3H (58 mg of catalyst containing 0.015 mmol total metal and 0.038 mmol (2.50 equiv.) IL‐SO3H), substrate (0.38 mmol), mesitylene (0.5 mL), H2 (50 bar), 150 °C. Conversion and product distribution were determined by GC using tetradecane as an internal standard. The close vicinity of the IL‐SO3H with the bimetallic particles as evidenced by the STEM/EDS data appears to be crucial for efficient hydrogenolysis. In contrast to Fe25Ru75@SILP+IL‐SO3H, a physical mixture of non‐functionalized Fe25Ru75@SILP and metal‐free SILP‐SO3H resulted in only slow formation of 1 d (7 %) with 1 a (70 %) and 1 b (18 %) being the main products after 16 h under identical reaction conditions (see the Supporting Information, Table S4). Similar synergistic effects were observed for Ru100@SILP‐SO3H in the deep hydrodeoxygenation of phenols.9f With leaching of physisorbed ionic liquids being a well‐known issue in solution phase catalysis,13a,13b the stability of Fe25Ru75@SILP+IL‐SO3H was carefully studied. Conversion and selectivity towards the formation of butylbenzene (1 d) were constant upon recycling of the catalyst material for at least four times without any make‐up or regeneration (see the Supporting Information, Table S5). This is in good agreement with quantitative SEM/EDS analysis, which did not evidence significant leaching of the metals nor of the acidic ionic liquid under reaction conditions. TEM analysis showed no NP growth or aggregation, and the conservation of their bimetallic nature was confirmed by STEM/EDS elemental mapping. BET analysis indicated that the textural properties of the bifunctional catalyst did not change (see the Supporting Information, Table S2 and Figures S2–6, for complete characterization details). The excellent stability of the catalyst is most likely reflecting favorable interactions between the covalently grafted and physisorbed ionic liquid structures arising from their molecular similarity. The substrate scope for the selective hydrodeoxygenation using the bifunctional Fe25Ru75@SILP+IL‐SO3H catalyst was assessed with a range of carbonyl‐substituted aromatic substrates (Table 1 and Table S7). Interestingly, while benzylideneacetone (1) was converted to the deoxygenation product 1 d in quantitative yields at 150 °C (Table 1, Entry 1), the efficient hydrodeoxygenation of 1‐phenyl‐1‐butanone (2) to give the same product 1 d required a temperature of 175 °C (Table 1, Entry 2). The hydrodeoxygenation of the 1,3‐diketone (3) at 175 °C also proceeded smoothly to give high yields of 1 d (Table 1, Entry 3). Performing this reaction at 100 °C evidenced the presence of 2 (22 %) and 4‐phenyl‐2‐butanone (1 a) (8 %) as intermediates (see the Supporting Information, Table S9). 4‐phenyl‐2‐butene (1 c) was also observed as an intermediate of the reaction at 100 °C (Table S9), which supports the reaction pathway discussed in Scheme 2. The greater amount of intermediate 2 as compared to 1 a indicates that the deoxygenation of the non‐benzylic ketone is favored over the benzylic ketone. This was confirmed by comparative rate studies for the hydrodeoxygenation of 2 and 1 a, demonstrating a two‐fold higher reaction rate for 1 a (Figure 4 and Figure S8). This unique reactivity pattern is in sharp contrast to previously reported hydrodeoxygenation catalysts.
Table 1

Hydrodeoxygenation of carbonyl‐substituted aromatic substrates using Fe25Ru75@SILP+IL‐SO3H.[a]

EntrySubstrateProduct [%][b]
1
>99[c]
2
>99[c]
3
94
4
82[d]
5
91
6
92
7
95
8
>99
9
>99

[a] Reaction conditions: Fe25Ru75@SILP+IL‐SO3H (58 mg catalyst containing 0.015 mmol total metal and 0.038 mmol (2.50 equiv.) IL‐SO3H), substrate (0.38 mmol, 25 equiv.), mesitylene (0.5 mL). [b] Yield determined by GC, conversion >99 %. [c] 150 °C. Remainders of reaction mixtures were composed of dimeric by‐products or [d] 4 a (12 %) and dimeric by‐products (6 %).

Figure 4

Comparative rate studies for the hydrodeoxygenation of 1‐phenyl‐1‐butanone (2) and 4‐phenyl‐2‐butanone (1 a) using Fe25Ru75@SILP+IL‐SO3H. Reaction conditions: Fe25Ru75@SILP+IL‐SO3H (58 mg catalyst containing 0.015 mmol total metal and 0.038 mmol (2.50 equiv.) IL‐SO3H), substrate (0.38 mmol), mesitylene (0.5 mL), H2 (50 bar), 150 °C. Conversion was determined by GC using tetradecane as an internal standard.

Comparative rate studies for the hydrodeoxygenation of 1‐phenyl‐1‐butanone (2) and 4‐phenyl‐2‐butanone (1 a) using Fe25Ru75@SILP+IL‐pan class="Chemical">SO3H. Reaction conditions: Fe25Ru75@SILP+IL‐SO3H (58 mg catalyst containing 0.015 mmol total metal and 0.038 mmol (2.50 equiv.) IL‐SO3H), substrate (0.38 mmol), mesitylene (0.5 mL), H2 (50 bar), 150 °C. Conversion was determined by GC using tetradecane as an internal standard. Hydrodeoxygenation of carbonyl‐substituted aromatic substrates using pan class="Chemical">Fe25Ru75@SILP+IL‐SO3H.[a] [a] Reaction conditions: Fe25Ru75@SILP+IL‐pan class="Chemical">SO3H (58 mg catalyst containing 0.015 mmol total metal and 0.038 mmol (2.50 equiv.) IL‐SO3H), substrate (0.38 mmol, 25 equiv.), mesitylene (0.5 mL). [b] Yield determined by GC, conversion >99 %. [c] 150 °C. Remainders of reaction mixtures were composed of dimeric by‐products or [d] 4 a (12 %) and dimeric by‐products (6 %). The hydrodeoxygenation of Friedel–Craft acylation products such as 2 provides an interesting alternative to classical Friedel–Crafts alkylation reactions, which are prone to overalkylation and carbocation rearrangements. The Fe25Ru75@SILP+IL‐SO3H catalyst proved to be very versatile in this context. The hydrodeoxygenation of acetophenone (4) and its derivatives 5 and 6 gave the corresponding deoxygenation products in over 90 % yield, irrespective of the presence of electron‐donating (5) or electron‐withdrawing (6) groups in the para‐position. Acylated naphthalene (7) was converted to 2‐ethylnapthalene (7 a) in quantitative yields under standard reaction conditions. Notably, the conversion of diphenylketone (8) to diphenylmethane (8 a) was also quantitative, indicating that the formation of an olefinic intermediate is not required in case sufficiently stable carbocations can be formed. Using Fe25Ru75@SILP+IL‐pan class="Chemical">SO3H, the hydrogenation of aromatic moieties was not observed for any of the substrates, even at prolonged reaction time. In sharp contrast, the use of monometallic Ru100@SILP+IL‐SO3H catalysts under similar reaction conditions led to deep hydrogenation of all substrates, yielding completely saturated deoxygenation products or product mixtures (for detailed results, see the Supporting Information, Table S8). Monometallic Fe100@SILP catalysts were previously tested and found inactive for the reduction of C=O bonds.11 This emphasizes how the bimetallic FeRu@SILP+IL‐SO3H catalyst provides a highly selective route towards the synthesis of a wide range of aromatic deoxygenation products that are not accessible using standard catalytic systems. As a general conclusion, the combination of ionic liquid (IL)‐modified surfaces and nanoparticle (NP) synthesis from organometallic precursors provides a highly flexible and versatile molecular approach to control the metal as well as the acid component of multifunctional catalytic systems. Covalent grafting and physisorption of the ILs allows separation of the functionalization from the stabilization effect of the SILP. This largely extends the range of possible metal precursor complexes as demonstrated in this study for the acid sensitive iron sources, opening a huge parameter space for multi‐metallic NPs to be assembled on the SILP surface. The post‐synthesis modification through the physisorption of functionalized ILs ensures an intimate contact between the desired functionality and the metal components. The potential of this approach for designing and generating multifunctional catalytic systems with tailor‐made reactivity for challenging catalytic transformations is exemplified with the Fe25Ru75@SILP+IL‐SO3H material for the selective hydrodeoxygenation of aromatic ketones. Thus, the presented multifunctional catalytic system constitutes an interesting alternative to Clemmensen and Wolff–Kishner reductions, opening a greener approach to alkylated aromatic compounds.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re‐organized for online delivery, but are not copy‐edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors. Supplementary Click here for additional data file.
  13 in total

1.  Supported ionic liquid catalysis--a new concept for homogeneous hydroformylation catalysis.

Authors:  Christian P Mehnert; Raymond A Cook; Nicholas C Dispenziere; Mobae Afeworki
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2002-11-06       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 2.  Hydrogenolysis goes bio: from carbohydrates and sugar alcohols to platform chemicals.

Authors:  Agnieszka M Ruppert; Kamil Weinberg; Regina Palkovits
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 15.336

3.  Hydrodeoxygenation of lignin-derived phenols into alkanes by using nanoparticle catalysts combined with Brønsted acidic ionic liquids.

Authors:  Ning Yan; Yuan Yuan; Ryan Dykeman; Yuan Kou; Paul J Dyson
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2010-07-26       Impact factor: 15.336

4.  Synthesis of 1-octanol and 1,1-dioctyl ether from biomass-derived platform chemicals.

Authors:  Jennifer Julis; Walter Leitner
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 15.336

5.  Synergistic Interaction within Bifunctional Ruthenium Nanoparticle/SILP Catalysts for the Selective Hydrodeoxygenation of Phenols.

Authors:  Kylie L Luska; Pedro Migowski; Sami El Sayed; Walter Leitner
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 15.336

Review 6.  Chemical routes for the transformation of biomass into chemicals.

Authors:  Avelino Corma; Sara Iborra; Alexandra Velty
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 7.  Conversion of biomass into chemicals over metal catalysts.

Authors:  Michèle Besson; Pierre Gallezot; Catherine Pinel
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 60.622

8.  Conversion of cellulose to hexitols catalyzed by ionic liquid-stabilized ruthenium nanoparticles and a reversible binding agent.

Authors:  Yinghuai Zhu; Zhen Ning Kong; Ludger Paul Stubbs; Huang Lin; Shoucang Shen; Eric V Anslyn; John A Maguire
Journal:  ChemSusChem       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 8.928

Review 9.  Advanced Biofuels and Beyond: Chemistry Solutions for Propulsion and Production.

Authors:  Walter Leitner; Jürgen Klankermayer; Stefan Pischinger; Heinz Pitsch; Katharina Kohse-Höinghaus
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 15.336

10.  Catalytic hydrogenolysis of aromatic ketones in mixed choline-betainium ionic liquids.

Authors:  Charlie Van Doorslaer; Joos Wahlen; Pascal G N Mertens; Ben Thijs; Peter Nockemann; Koen Binnemans; Dirk E De Vos
Journal:  ChemSusChem       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 8.928

View more
  5 in total

1.  Bimetallic Nanoparticles in Supported Ionic Liquid Phases as Multifunctional Catalysts for the Selective Hydrodeoxygenation of Aromatic Substrates.

Authors:  Lisa Offner-Marko; Alexis Bordet; Gilles Moos; Simon Tricard; Simon Rengshausen; Bruno Chaudret; Kylie L Luska; Walter Leitner
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 15.336

2.  Molecular Control of the Catalytic Properties of Rhodium Nanoparticles in Supported Ionic Liquid Phase (SILP) Systems.

Authors:  Alexis Bordet; Gilles Moos; Calum Welsh; Peter Licence; Kylie L Luska; Walter Leitner
Journal:  ACS Catal       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 13.084

3.  Topological engineering of two-dimensional ionic liquid islands for high structural stability and CO2 adsorption selectivity.

Authors:  Chenlu Wang; Yanlei Wang; Zhongdong Gan; Yumiao Lu; Cheng Qian; Feng Huo; Hongyan He; Suojiang Zhang
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 9.825

Review 4.  Insights into Ionic Liquids: From Z-Bonds to Quasi-Liquids.

Authors:  Yanlei Wang; Hongyan He; Chenlu Wang; Yumiao Lu; Kun Dong; Feng Huo; Suojiang Zhang
Journal:  JACS Au       Date:  2022-02-01

5.  Highly modulated supported triazolium-based ionic liquids: direct control of the electronic environment on Cu nanoparticles.

Authors:  Cristián Valdebenito; Jose Pinto; Michael Nazarkovsky; Gustavo Chacón; Oriol Martínez-Ferraté; Kerry Wrighton-Araneda; Diego Cortés-Arriagada; María Belén Camarada; Jesum Alves Fernandes; Gabriel Abarca
Journal:  Nanoscale Adv       Date:  2020-02-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.