Alexis Bordet1, Gilles Moos1,2, Calum Welsh3, Peter Licence3, Kylie L Luska2, Walter Leitner1,2. 1. Max Planck Institute for Chemical Energy Conversion, Stiftstrasse 34-36, Mülheim an der Ruhr 45470, Germany. 2. Institut für Technische und Makromolekulare Chemie, RWTH Aachen University, Worringerweg 2, Aachen 52074, Germany. 3. The University of Nottingham, School of Chemistry, Clifton Boulevard, Nottingham NG7 2RD, United Kingdom.
Abstract
Rhodium nanoparticles (NPs) immobilized on imidazolium-based supported ionic liquid phases (Rh@SILP) act as effective catalysts for the hydrogenation of biomass-derived furfuralacetone. The structure of ionic liquid-type (IL) molecular modifiers was systematically varied regarding spacer, side chain, and anion to assess the influence on the NP synthesis and their catalytic properties. Well-dispersed Rh NPs with diameters in the range of 0.6-2.0 nm were formed on all SILP materials, whereby the actual size was dependent significantly on the IL structure. The resulting variations in catalytic activity for hydrogenation of the C=O moiety in furfuralacetone allowed control of the product selectivity to obtain either the saturated alcohol or the ketone in high yield. Experiments conducted under batch and continuous flow conditions demonstrated that Rh NPs immobilized on SILPs with suitable IL structures are more active and much more stable than Rh@SiO2 catalyst synthesized on unmodified silica.
Rhodium nanoparticles (NPs) immobilized on imidazolium-based supported ionic liquid phases (Rh@SILP) act as effective catalysts for the hydrogenation of biomass-derived furfuralacetone. The structure of ionic liquid-type (IL) molecular modifiers was systematically varied regarding spacer, side chain, and anion to assess the influence on the NP synthesis and their catalytic properties. Well-dispersed Rh NPs with diameters in the range of 0.6-2.0 nm were formed on all SILP materials, whereby the actual size was dependent significantly on the IL structure. The resulting variations in catalytic activity for hydrogenation of the C=O moiety in furfuralacetone allowed control of the product selectivity to obtain either the saturated alcohol or the ketone in high yield. Experiments conducted under batch and continuous flow conditions demonstrated that Rh NPs immobilized on SILPs with suitable IL structures are more active and much more stable than Rh@SiO2 catalyst synthesized on unmodified silica.
Ionic liquids (ILs)
have found significant interest for the synthesis
of metal nanoparticles (NPs) because of their dual role as reaction
solvents and NP stabilizers.[1,2] In particular, imidazolium-based
ionic liquids have been used with a broad range of metals because
the supramolecular aggregates in these ILs form a protective environment
preventing agglomeration.[3,4] NPs immobilized in ILs
(NPs@ILs) have been employed successfully in catalysis as the IL stabilizers
allow efficient access for incoming substrates providing a good balance
between NP stability and activity.[1] Due
to the intimate contact between the IL and metal NPs, the molecular
structure of the IL also plays an important role in defining the morphological
(e.g., NP size, shape)[5−9] and catalytic properties (e.g., activity, selectivity, stability)[10−26] of these systems. Thus, the structural diversity of ILs provides
a molecular tool by which the properties of NP-based catalysts can
be tailored.The attractive features of ILs have stimulated
their use as molecular
modifiers for solid materials as catalyst supports. Immobilization
of ILs onto porous solids can be accomplished through either physi-
or chemisorption, whereby the covalent grafting on silica support
has emerged as a very versatile methodology.[27,28] After incorporation onto solid materials the IL-type modifiers can
no longer be considered a true “liquid phase”; nevertheless,
these materials are commonly referred to as supported ionic liquid
phases (SILPs). SILPs have been shown to be productive supports for
metal NPs[29] (NP@SILP) as they combine the
properties of NP@IL catalysts with those of classical supported catalysts
including (1) enhanced catalyst stability due to combination of the
electrosteric protection of the IL-like layer with the stabilization
from the support material and (2) direct implementation into continuous
flow processes.[30,31] NPs@SILP catalysts have been
used very successfully in a variety of transformations including C–C
coupling, hydrogenation, hydrogenolysis, and hydrodeoxygenation under
batch and continuous flow conditions.[29−41] While the influence of the molecular structure of the ILs on the
morphology and catalytic properties of metal nanoparticles has been
widely studied for the bulk liquid phase,[5−26] the impact of grafting the IL-type structure covalently on a porous
solid is not clear. Understanding how the structure of the IL-like
surface functionalities affects the NP synthesis in correlation to
the catalytic properties of NP@SILP materials is, however, a prerequisite
for the systematic design of these promising catalytic systems.[32,34]In the present study, we describe the organometallic synthesis
of rhodium NPs on a series of imidazolium-based SILPs (Rh@SILP) to
assess the influence of the IL-type structural features (anion, alkyl
spacer, and N-alkyl chain length) (Figure ) on the morphology of the
NPs and the catalytic properties of the materials. The catalytic hydrogenation
of biomass-derived furfuralacetone under batch and continuous flow
conditions was used as a reactive probe to evaluate the catalytic
activities, selectivities, and stabilities in relation to the molecular
architecture of the SILP.
Figure 1
Schematic representation of the tunable parameters
of an imidazolium-based
supported ionic liquid phase (SILP) used for the organometallic synthesis
of rhodium nanoparticles (Rh@SILP).
Schematic representation of the tunable parameters
of an imidazolium-based
supported ionic liquid phase (SILP) used for the organometallic synthesis
of rhodium nanoparticles (Rh@SILP).
Results
and Discussion
Synthesis and Characterization of Rh@SILP
Catalysts
The syntheses of SILPs involved condensation of
triethoxysilane-functionalized
imidazolium ILs with dehydroxylated silica following an established
procedure (see ESI for complete experimental
and characterization details).[35] A material
with a neutral n-octyl chain grafted on silica (Si–Oct)
was prepared by the same method using n-octyltriethoxysilane
for comparison. The modularity of the IL precursors allowed for the
preparation of a series of silica-based SILPs with systematic variations
of the key structural parameters (Figure ). For the anion, the hydrophobicity was
reduced and coordination strength increased for X = NTf2 (SILP-1) over OTf (SILP-2) to Br (SILP-3) while keeping the spacer constant at n = 3 and the side chain R = n-octyl. The alkyl spacer
was varied between n = 1 (SILP-4) and n = 3 (SILP-1) for the NTf2 anion
and the n-octyl side chain. The N-alkyl side chain was varied in length from R = methyl (SILP-5) over n-butyl (SILP-6) and n-octyl (SILP-1) to n-decyl
(SILP-7) with the NTf2 anion and the spacer
with n = 3.
Figure 2
Supported ionic liquid phases (SILPs) prepared
to evaluate the
influence of the anion, alkyl spacer, and N-alkyl
chain length on the properties of immobilized rhodium nanoparticles.
OTf = trifluoromethanesulfonate and NTf2 = bis(trifluoromethane)sulfonimide.
Supported ionic liquid phases (SILPs) prepared
to evaluate the
influence of the anion, alkyl spacer, and N-alkyl
chain length on the properties of immobilized rhodium nanoparticles.
OTf = trifluoromethanesulfonate and NTf2 = bis(trifluoromethane)sulfonimide.Analysis of the SILPs using diffuse reflectance
infrared Fourier
transform spectroscopy (DRIFTS) showed signals at 3153 and 2940 cm–1 characteristic of the C–H stretches of the
imidazolium ring and N-alkyl chain as well as symmetric
ring stretches of the imidazolium moieties at 1569 and 1465 cm–1 (Figure S1). Characterization
of the SILPs using N2 adsorption showed the expected decrease
in the surface area and pore volume in comparison to starting dehydroxylated
SiO2 upon functionalization with the IL precursor (Table ). The decrease was
significantly more pronounced for the SILP materials as compared to
the modification with the neutral octyl chain in Si–Oct. No
significant trends could be derived from variation of the anion or
side chain.
Table 1
Characterization of the Supports,
Including IL Loading and N2 Adsorption Measurements
support
IL loading (mmol·g–1)
surface
area (BET, m2·g–1)
pore size (nm)
pore volume (cm3·g–1)
SiO2
342.3
8.8
1.07
Si–Oct
0.40
305.1
8.1
0.94
SILP-1
0.60
222.4
7.1
0.69
SILP-2
0.75
209.9
7.0
0.63
SILP-3
0.68
210.5
7.3
0.66
SILP-4
0.69
187.2
7.2
0.61
SILP-5
0.77
225.0
7.9
0.66
SILP-6
0.70
211.0
7.4
0.68
SILP-7
0.61
220.6
7.2
0.69
Preparation of Rh NPs involved wet impregnation of the SILP (0.5
g) with a solution of the organometallic precursor [Rh(allyl)3] (11.3 mg, 0.05 mmol) in dichloromethane (5 mL).[36] Upon removal of the solvent in vacuo, the impregnated
SILP was placed under an atmosphere of H2 (50 bar) at 100
°C for 18 h. During this treatment, the color of the powder
changed from light yellow to dark black, indicating formation of nanoparticles
to yield Rh@SILP. For comparison, Rh@SiO2 on untreated
silica and Rh@Si–Oct was also synthesized using the same procedure.
Characterization of the Rh@SILPs by ICP-AAS showed a metal loading
of 0.8–1.0 wt %, well in agreement with the theoretical value
(Table ). TEM analysis
evidenced formation of well-dispersed NPs with a narrow size distribution
on the different materials (Figure S2 and Table ).
Table 2
Characterization of the Catalysts,
Including Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM, nanoparticles size
distribution) and Inductively Coupled Plasma with Atom-Emission Spectroscopy
(ICP-AAS, Rh loading)
catalyst
NPs size (nm)
Rh loading (mmol·g–1)
Rh@SiO2
1.2 ± 0.2
0.098
Rh@Si–Oct
1.1 ± 0.3
0.083
Rh@SILP-1
1.2 ± 0.3
0.081
Rh@SILP-2
1.2 ± 0.2
0.097
Rh@SILP-3
0.6 ± 0.1
0.088
Rh@SILP-4
2.0 ± 0.4
0.091
Rh@SILP-5
0.7 ± 0.1
0.085
Rh@SILP-6
0.9 ± 0.1
0.084
Rh@SILP-7
1.4 ± 0.2
0.093
While Rh NPs synthesized
on SiO2 as well as Si–Oct
showed very similar mean diameters of 1.1 and 1.2 nm, respectively,
the size of the NPs was significantly influenced by the presence and
the nature of the ionic liquid ranging from 0.6 to 2.0 nm. Elongation
of the N-alkyl side chain from C1 (R = Me, SILP-5), over C4 and C8 (n-Bu, SILP-6; n-Oct SILP-1), to C10 (n-Dec, SILP-7) resulted in a progressive increase in
the size of the nanoparticles from 0.7 to 1.4 nm. Comparable findings
were reported by Basset et al. for the synthesis of Ru NPs (1.0–2.5
nm range) in pure imidazolium-based ionic liquids of related structures
and identical NTf2 anion.[7] Reducing
the spacer length from 3 carbons (SILP-1) to 1 carbon
(SILP-4) also induced a quite significant change in
the size of the nanoparticles with the mean diameter increasing from
1.2 to 2.0 nm (Figure ). Exchanging the large and weakly coordinating anions NTf2– (SILP-1) and OTf– (SILP-2) for small and highly coordinating Br– (SILP-3) also led to a significant decrease in mean
diameter to 0.6 nm. Janiak et al. observed similar trends concerning
the influence of the anion size on the synthesis of nanoparticles
(Ag, Cr, Mo, and W, 3–28 nm range) in pure imidazolium-based
ionic liquids.[8,9] In summary, while not directly
comparable to the effects previously reported for the preparation
of NPs in bulk ionic liquids (different metal and/or size range),
our results demonstrate that the molecularly modified surfaces resulting
from chemisorbed ionic liquid-type structures are able to influence
the morphology and, in particular, the size of NPs generated by organometallic
methods with similar trends.
Figure 3
Transmission electron microscopy analysis of
(a) Rh@SILP-1 and (b) Rh@SILP-4.
Transmission electron microscopy analysis of
(a) Rh@SILP-1 and (b) Rh@SILP-4.XPS characterization was performed to investigate the electronic
structures of the SILP and Rh@SILP materials. The results confirm
retention of the charge distribution in the IL structures upon grafting
and NPs synthesis (Figures S3–S5) and indicate the presence of Rh(0) and oxidized Rh centers in the
Rh NPs (Figure S6).The thermal stability
of the Rh@SILP materials was evaluated through
thermogravimetric analyses performed under Ar (Figure S7). In all cases, decomposition was associated with
a mass loss of 15–20%. The majority of the Rh@SILP materials
synthesized were stable up to a temperature range of 330–370
°C with the exception of Rh@SILP-3 (Br as anion),
which started to decompose already at 280 °C. No additional trends
linking the thermal stability to the structure of the ionic liquid
could be identified. These results are fully consistent with previous
reports on the thermostability of comparable imidazolium-based ILs
supported on silica that showed structural integrity in the range
270-400 °C with bromide anions resulting in the lowest stability.[42,43]
Evaluation of the Catalytic Properties: Selective Hydrogenation
of Furfuralacetone
The catalytic properties of Rh@SILPs were
investigated for the hydrogenation of furfuralacetone (1) as a model substrate (Figure ). Hydrogenation of this biomass-derived substrate
provides access to products that are considered as potential fuels
and fuel additives.[44] They are also interesting
as chemical building blocks. In the present context, the different
functional groups present in this substrate offer the possibility
to evaluate variations in the catalytic activity, selectivity, and
stability by analysis of the product spectrum as a function of time
under batch and continuous flow operation.
Figure 4
Hydrogenation network
of furfuralacetone (1).
Hydrogenation network
of furfuralacetone (1).The first step of the reaction network consists in the hydrogenation
of C=C to give 4-(2-furanyl)-2-butanone (2). Then
either the furan ring is hydrogenated first, giving the saturated
ketone4-(tetrahydro-2-furanyl)-2-butanone (3) through
route a, or the ketone is hydrogenated first, giving the unsaturated
alcohol α-methyl-2-furanpropanol (4) through route
b. Finally, 3 and 4 are hydrogenated to
form the completely saturated tetrahydro-α-methyl-2-furanpropanol
(5). Noble metal catalysts typically follow pathway a
and generally lead to the deep hydrogenation product 5 as the main product. While deoxygenation of the secondary alcohol
and ring opening are also possible with NPs in ILs or on SILPs, these
consecutive reactions starting from 5 require multifunctional
systems comprising acidic co-catalysts[30,35,38] and are not relevant for this study.The catalytic
performance of Rh@SILPs catalysts was investigated
in batch conditions using magnetically stirred high-pressure reactors
(10 mL, stainless steel) in heating cones under controlled conditions.
In typical experiments, furfuralacetone (54.5 mg; 0.40 mmol; 100 equiv)
was dissolved in heptane (0.5 mL) and reacted in the presence of the
catalyst (40.0 mg; 0.004 mmol of Rh) under H2 (20 bar)
at 100 °C.A first objective consisted in investigating
the use of the imidazolium-type
molecular modifiers in SILPs as compared to conventional support materials.
Therefore, the catalytic properties of Rh@SILP-1, Rh@SiO2, and Rh@Si–Oct were examined for hydrogenation of
furfuralacetone after 1 and 18 h reaction times (Table ).
Table 3
Hydrogenation
of Furfuralacetone Using
Rh NPs Immobilized on Various Supportsa
Reaction
conditions: Rh@SILP (40
mg, 0.004 mmol total metal loading), heptane (0.5 mL), furfuralacetone
(0.4 mmol, 100 equiv), H2 (20 bar), 100 °C.
Determined by GC using tetradecane
as an internal standard. The conversion is 100% in all cases.
Calculated based on the estimated
percentage of Rh atoms at the surface of the NPs, see SI and Table S1 for details.
Reaction
conditions: Rh@SILP (40
mg, 0.004 mmol total metal loading), heptane (0.5 mL), furfuralacetone
(0.4 mmol, 100 equiv), H2 (20 bar), 100 °C.Determined by GC using tetradecane
as an internal standard. The conversion is 100% in all cases.Calculated based on the estimated
percentage of Rh atoms at the surface of the NPs, see SI and Table S1 for details.While the three catalysts contain
Rh NPs of similar sizes, Rh@SILP-1 was found to be more
effective than Rh@SiO2 and Rh@Si–Oct for complete
hydrogenation of 1 to product 5 (68% yield
after 1 h, 99% after 18 h).
On the basis of the estimated surface Rh atoms, this corresponds to
a much higher turnover frequency (TOF) for product formation. Considering
the necessary hydrogenation events (1 to reach 2, 3 for 3, and 4 for 5), the difference is even more
pronounced. In all cases, the saturated ketone 3 was
observed as the main intermediate, confirming that pathway a is favored
on Rh NPs as expected. These results indicate that Rh NPs immobilized
on SILP-1 exhibit superior catalytic activity compared
to those immobilized on SiO2 and Si–Oct, in particular
with respect to the ketone hydrogenation step 3/5. This
point being clarified, the influence of structural changes in SILPs
on the catalytic properties of Rh NPs was investigated. The results
obtained with Rh nanoparticles supported on SiO2 (without
ionic liquid) are systematically given as a reference (Tables –6).
Table 4
Hydrogenation of Furfuralacetone Using
Rh@SILP with Different Anionsa
Reaction conditions:
Rh@SILP (40
mg, 0.004 mmol total metal loading), heptane (0.5 mL), furfuralacetone
(0.4 mmol, 100 equiv), H2 (20 bar), 100 °C.
Determined by GC using tetradecane
as an internal standard. The conversion is 100% in all cases.
Calculated based on the estimated
percentage of Rh atoms at the surface of the NPs, see SI and Table S1 for details.
Table 6
Hydrogenation of Furfuralacetone Using
Rh@SILP with Different Spacer Lengthsa
Reaction
conditions: Rh@SILP (40
mg, 0.004 mmol total metal loading), heptane (0.5 mL), furfuralacetone
(0.4 mmol, 100 equiv), H2 (20 bar), 100 °C.
Determined by GC using tetradecane
as an internal standard. The conversion is 100% in all cases.
Reaction conditions:
Rh@SILP (40
mg, 0.004 mmol total metal loading), heptane (0.5 mL), furfuralacetone
(0.4 mmol, 100 equiv), H2 (20 bar), 100 °C.Determined by GC using tetradecane
as an internal standard. The conversion is 100% in all cases.Calculated based on the estimated
percentage of Rh atoms at the surface of the NPs, see SI and Table S1 for details.We first studied the influence of
the nature of the anion on the
catalytic properties of Rh@SILP materials (Table ). Using OTf or Br as anions in Rh@SILP-2 and Rh@SILP-3 led to mixtures of 3 and 5 after 1 h with the saturated ketone 3 as the main product (98% and 89% yield, respectively). In
contrast, 5 was obtained as the major product (68%) using
Rh@SILP-1 corresponding to a much higher TOF of product
formation per surface Rh atom than for Rh@SILP-2 and
Rh@SILP-3. This trend was confirmed after 18 h reaction
time, where only Rh@SILP-1 achieved nearly quantitative
formation of 5. Given the rather slow hydrogenation of 3 to 5 with Rh@SILP-2 (only 12%
conversion in 17 h), this catalyst can be in fact considered quite
selective for C=C vs C=O hydrogenation in substrate 1. Use of the largest and most weakly coordinating anion (NTf2) was found to be highly beneficial to achieve full hydrogenation
of furfuralacetone. This is consistent with previous studies involving
metal NPs in bulk ionic liquids for hydrogenation reactions.[45] Concluding that the NTf2 anion exhibits
the weakest interaction with the NPs, it was used in all materials
for the rest of the study.In the next step, the influence of
the length of the N-alkyl chain was investigated
(Table ). For a reaction
time fixed to 1 h, the increase in
the N-alkyl chain length (Me → Bu →
Oct) associated with the increase in NPs size (0.7 → 0.9 →
1.2 nm) resulted in an increase in the yield of 5 and
the corresponding TOFs. Increasing the N-alkyl chain
length (Dec) further gave a substantially lower yield of 5 and TOF despite the continuing growth of the particle size. After
18 h, Rh@SILP-6, 1, and 7 led to quantitative yields of 5, while Rh@SILP-5 still gave a mixture of 3 and 5. These results suggest a significant NPs size
effect with a size of 1.2 nm displaying optimal catalytic activity
for complete hydrogenation of furfuralacetone to 5. Again,
it appears that the ketone hydrogenation step is influenced most strongly,
albeit far less than through the anion variation.
Table 5
Hydrogenation of Furfuralacetone Using
Rh@SILP with Different N-Alkyl Chainsa
Reaction conditions: Rh@SILP (40
mg, 0.004 mmol total metal loading), heptane (0.5 mL), furfuralacetone
(0.4 mmol, 100 equiv), H2 (20 bar), 100 °C.
Determined by GC using tetradecane
as an internal standard. The conversion is 100% in all cases.
Calculated based on the estimated
percentage of Rh atoms at the surface of the NPs, see SI and Table S1 for details.
Reaction conditions: Rh@SILP (40
mg, 0.004 mmol total metal loading), heptane (0.5 mL), furfuralacetone
(0.4 mmol, 100 equiv), H2 (20 bar), 100 °C.Determined by GC using tetradecane
as an internal standard. The conversion is 100% in all cases.Calculated based on the estimated
percentage of Rh atoms at the surface of the NPs, see SI and Table S1 for details.The influence of the distance between
the cationic head group of
the ionic liquid and the support was studied by decreasing the length
of the spacer from 3 carbons (SILP-1) to 1 carbon atom
(SILP-4) while keeping the NTf2 anion and
the N-octyl chain (Table ). In the case of
Rh@SILP-4 (C1 spacer), 97% of 3 was obtained
even after 18 h reaction time, suggesting a strongly suppressed ketone
hydrogenation. Complementary experiments performed with shorter (1
h) and longer (28 h) reaction times showed that the conversion of 1 to 3 involving C=C hydrogenation is
very fast while the C=O hydrogenation of 3 to 5 is essentially shut down. Time profiles of furfuralacetone
hydrogenation over Rh@SILP-1 and Rh@SILP-4 were recorded in order to bring further insight into their reactivity
(Figure ). Using Rh@SILP-1, furfuralacetone was very quickly (∼1 h) converted
to the saturated ketone 3, which was then consumed over
time to give a quantitative yield of 5 after 8 h in a
typical kinetic profile for sequential reaction steps.
Figure 5
Reaction time profile for the hydrogenation
of furfuralacetone
using (a) Rh@SILP-1 and (b) Rh@SILP-4. Reaction
conditions: Rh@SILP (10 mg, 0.001 mmol of Rh), furfuralacetone (68.0
mg, 0.5 mmol, 500 equiv), heptane (0.5 mL) (20 bar), 100 °C.
Error bars represent the variations from three independent experiments.
Reaction
conditions: Rh@SILP (40
mg, 0.004 mmol total metal loading), heptane (0.5 mL), furfuralacetone
(0.4 mmol, 100 equiv), H2 (20 bar), 100 °C.Determined by GC using tetradecane
as an internal standard. The conversion is 100% in all cases.Reaction time profile for the hydrogenation
of furfuralacetone
using (a) Rh@SILP-1 and (b) Rh@SILP-4. Reaction
conditions: Rh@SILP (10 mg, 0.001 mmol of Rh), furfuralacetone (68.0
mg, 0.5 mmol, 500 equiv), heptane (0.5 mL) (20 bar), 100 °C.
Error bars represent the variations from three independent experiments.Hydrogenation of the aliphatic and aromatic C=C
double bonds
over Rh@SILP-1 was so fast that no significant concentration
of the intermediate 2 was built up. The rate of the final
C=O hydrogenation in compound 3 can be determined
as 0.204 M·h–1, corresponding to a TOF for
this last step of 187 h–1. The TOF for the overall
formation of product 5 is estimated as 159 h–1 under these conditions, confirming that it is almost completely
determined by the C=O hydrogenation rate. In contrast, a mixture
of 2 and 3 (29% and 70%, respectively) was
observed after 1 h reaction when Rh@SILP-4 was used as
catalyst. In this case, hydrogenation of the heteroaromatic ring is
significantly slower than that with Rh@SILP-1 but still
occurs with an estimated rate of 0.695 M·h–1 and TOF of 992 h–1. After 4 h, 2 was
completely converted to the saturated ketone 3, which
was not further hydrogenated to 5 even after a reaction
time of 28 h, confirming the exceptional selectivity of the C1 spacer catalyst Rh@SILP-4 accessing product 3 in nearly quantitative yield.Notably, the large difference
in catalytic performance upon reducing
the size of the alkyl spacer from three carbons in Rh@SILP-1 to one carbon in Rh@SILP-4 is corroborated again with
a significant increase of the NPs size from 1.2 to 2.0 nm. This observation
is consistent with the trend shown in Table , where the activity of Rh NPs for the overall
transformation 1 → 5 increases with
their size until reaching a maximum at 1.2 nm and then decreases for
larger NPs. The corroboration between particle size and catalyst performance
is illustrated via the estimated TOF values for the overall product 5 formation in Figure . The product composition at different time intervals indicates
that this trend reflects largely the C=O hydrogenation activity,
which ultimately becomes almost negligible for the 2 nm NPs in Rh@SILP-4 under these conditions. Nevertheless, further insight
will be required to distinguish whether the change in C=O hydrogenation
activity is reflecting a preferred activation of the functional group
or a different mode of activation for H2 (homolytic vs
heterolytic) or even a combination of the two.
Figure 6
Nanoparticles size effect
in the hydrogenation of 1 to 5 using Rh@SILP
catalysts. TOFs calculated based
on the estimated percentage of Rh atoms at the surface of the NPs,
see SI and Table S1 for details.
Nanoparticles size effect
in the hydrogenation of 1 to 5 using Rh@SILP
catalysts. TOFs calculated based
on the estimated percentage of Rh atoms at the surface of the NPs,
see SI and Table S1 for details.Huan and co-workers reported similar effects when
using supported
Ru NPs for hydrogenation of aromatic ketones.[46] The authors observed low activity for NPs below 4 nm and then increasing
TOFs when increasing the size of the Ru NPs up to 5–6 nm followed
by a drop of activity for larger NPs. The influence of the SILP structure
observed with Rh NPs in the present study follows the same trend,
albeit centered on a much smaller “optimal” size and
with more marked drops of activity at lower and larger NPs sizes.While NPs size effects on ketone hydrogenation have been scarcely
described in the literature,[46] the study
of furfuralacetone hydrogenation under batch conditions evidenced
a clear influence of the ionic liquid-type modifier in the SILP materials
on the catalytic properties of the Rh@SILP systems. Two distinct selectivities
were identified for the Rh@SILP catalysts leading to effective formation
of either the deep hydrogenation product 5 (Rh@SILP-1) or the saturated ketone 3 (Rh@SILP-4). The activity, selectivity, and stability of these catalysts were
further investigated under continuous flow conditions and compared
directly to the materials on more conventional supports Rh@SiO2 and Rh@Si–Oct (Figure ). Experimentally, a solution of furfuralacetone (0.05
M in heptane) was passed over a cartridge packed with the Rh-based
catalysts using a H-Cube Pro reactor system at a substrate flow rate
of 0.5 mL·min–1 (residence time = 2.00 min).
The temperature and H2 pressure applied were similar to
what was used for batch reactions, i.e., 100 °C and 20 bar H2 (35 mL·min–1).
Figure 7
Hydrogenation of furfuralacetone
(0.05 M in heptane, 0.5 mL·min–1) using different
Rh-based catalysts (200 mg, 0.02
mmol Rh) under continuous flow conditions at 100 °C and 20 bar
H2 (gas flow rate = 35 N mL·min–1): (a) Rh@SiO2, (b) Rh@Si–Oct, (c) Rh@SILP-1, and (d) Rh@SILP-4.
Hydrogenation of furfuralacetone
(0.05 M in heptane, 0.5 mL·min–1) using different
Rh-based catalysts (200 mg, 0.02
mmol Rh) under continuous flow conditions at 100 °C and 20 bar
H2 (gas flow rate = 35 N mL·min–1): (a) Rh@SiO2, (b) Rh@Si–Oct, (c) Rh@SILP-1, and (d) Rh@SILP-4.The Rh@SiO2 and Rh@Si–Oct showed a very similar
behavior, indicating rapid changes of the catalytic properties over
time. The catalyst with unmodified silica as support showed a high
initial activity and selectivity toward formation of the completely
saturated product 5 (Figure a). However, the product distribution changed
drastically within a few hours on stream (70% of 3 and
30% of 2 after 6 h), evidencing a strong loss of catalytic
activity with time. Using the n-octyl-capped silica
resulted in a largely comparable performance, albeit the deactivation
process was slightly slower (Figure b). While ICP-AAS measurements did not show any significant
change in the Rh content of these catalysts, BET and TEM analyses
evidenced a clear decrease of the surface area and increase of the
NPs size after 6 h on stream (Table S2 and Figure S10). The increase of the Rh NPs size observed for the reference
catalysts under catalytic conditions (from 1.2 to 2.3 on the SiO2 support and from 1.1 to 2.1 on the Si–Oct support)
is a well-known deactivation process for supported nanoparticles reflecting
sintering and/or Ostwald ripening.[47,48] In agreement
with the NPs size effect highlighted in Figure , the progressive growth of the NPs corroborates
with the decreasing yield of 5 over time.In sharp
contrast, the SILP materials containing the imidazolium-based
surface modifiers retained their initial performance in a much more
stable way. Using Rh@SILP-1 in continuous flow conditions
led to formation of the deep hydrogenation product 5 with
high activity throughout the full time on stream (Figure c), showing only a slight decrease
of selectivity with time (yield of 5 decreased from 95%
to 85% after 6 h). In agreement with what was observed under batch
conditions, the catalytic hydrogenation of furfuralacetone using Rh@SILP-4 in continuous flow conditions led to selective formation
of the saturated ketone 3 in high yield (Figure d). The performance of Rh@SILP-4 was found to be very stable with a yield of 3 higher than 90% with only minor variations over the 6 h time on
stream. ICP-AAS and IR analyses of the used catalysts did not evidence
any leaching or structural changes of the ionic liquids after catalysis
in continuous flow conditions (Table S2 and Figure S8). In addition, TEM, ICP-AAS, and BET showed that the NPs
size, Rh loading, and surface area of Rh@SILP-1 and Rh@SILP-4 did not change significantly, further evidencing the
increased stability imposed by the SILP materials as compared to the
conventional supports (Table S2 and Figure S9).Additional experiments performed at a higher flow rate (1.0
mL·min–1) led to a lower yield of 3 (20%), which
only decreased to 17% after ca. 4 h on stream, thus confirming the
catalyst’s very good stability (Figure S10).
Conclusion
The synthesis, characterization,
and catalytic evaluation of rhodium
nanoparticles (NPs) immobilized on a systematic set of imidazolium-based
supported ionic liquid phases (Rh@SILP) provided insight into the
potential control factors offered by the IL-type surface modifiers
on the performance of the materials in catalysis. The molecularly
defined SILP materials were found to lead to significantly more active
and stable systems as compared to unmodified or simple alkyl-capped
silica materials in the catalytic hydrogenation of furfuralacetone
as a reactive probe. Systematic variation of the molecular structure
(anion, spacer length, N-alkyl chain length) of the
ionic liquid-type molecular modifier at the silica surface was demonstrated
to influence the morphology of the synthesized nanoparticles with
trends comparable to what has been reported in bulk ionic liquids.
This indicates that the chemisorption of ionic liquids on solid supports
does not significantly deprive them of their ability to control nanoparticle
formation despite the fact that the same supramolecular aggregates
as in the liquid phase cannot be formed on the surface layer.While additional effects from the direct NP–SILP interaction
cannot be excluded, control of the NP size during organometallic preparation
seems to corroborate directly with the catalytic performance in particular
regarding the C=O hydrogenation. It is currently impossible
to distinguish whether the IL influences both size and activity or whether the size effect causes the change in reactivity.
Further research will be required to resolve this “hen-and-egg”
problem. Nevertheless, the systematic trends can be used as guidelines
in the rational design of catalysts with specific reactivity, as demonstrated
here for selective production of either the saturated alcohol or the
ketone as the target product for furfuralacetone hydrogenation.
Authors: Walter Leitner; Jürgen Klankermayer; Stefan Pischinger; Heinz Pitsch; Katharina Kohse-Höinghaus Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2017-04-21 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Muhammad I Qadir; Marcus V Castegnaro; Felipe F Selau; Mario Samperi; Jesum Alves Fernandes; Jonder Morais; Jairton Dupont Journal: ChemSusChem Date: 2020-03-17 Impact factor: 8.928