Literature DB >> 30175178

Early Results of Oxford Mobile Bearing Medial Unicompartmental Knee Replacement (UKR) with the Microplasty Instrumentation: An Indian Experience.

Sahil Gaba1,2, Naman Wahal1,2, Deepak Gautam1,2, Hemant Pandit1,2, Vijay Kumar1,2, Rajesh Malhotra1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) is indicated in patients with anteromedial osteoarthritis (AMOA) of the knee. Microplasty (MP) instrumentation was introduced in 2012 as an improvement over phase 3 instrumentation. Advantages of this instrumentation include conservative tibial cut, decreased tibial re-cut rate and improved component alignment. We report the results of UKR with the new instrumentation in a consecutive series with a minimum follow-up of 2 years.
METHODS: A prospective study of 115 cemented medial Oxford UKRs implanted in 89 patients was done. Post-operative alignment of the tibial and femoral components was analysed. Patient reported outcome measures were recorded using Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and the American Knee Society Score (KSS). Tegner Activity Scale (TAS) was used to record the activity level.
RESULTS: 115 consecutive medial Oxford UKRs were studied. All patients were followed up annually in this prospective ethically approved study. The mean follow-up was 36 months and the minimum follow-up was 25 months. No patient died and none were lost to follow-up. At the final follow-up, the average OKS of the cohort was 39.5 (SD: 5.7). 91.2 % of the patients had good or excellent OKS with only 3.5 % reporting poor OKS. The overall limb alignment was 4.80 varus (0 - 140 varus). Tibia was recut in 5.2 % of cases. Median bearing size was 3 (range: 3 to 6). There was one case of bearing dislocation and one case of aseptic tibial loosening.
CONCLUSION: This is the first study to report results of MP instrumentation at a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Our study indicates that the new instrumentation results in reliable and accurate implantation of femoral and tibial components in majority of the cases, with a decrease in number of alignment outliers, and also a reduced rate of bearing dislocation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anteromedial osteoarthritis (AMOA); Microplasty instrumentation; Mobile bearing; Unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR)

Year:  2018        PMID: 30175178      PMCID: PMC6110431     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg        ISSN: 2345-461X


  23 in total

1.  Anteromedial osteoarthritis of the knee.

Authors:  S H White; P F Ludkowski; J W Goodfellow
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1991-07

2.  The Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement using a minimally-invasive approach.

Authors:  H Pandit; C Jenkins; K Barker; C A F Dodd; D W Murray
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2006-01

3.  Cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement shows reduced radiolucency at one year.

Authors:  H Pandit; C Jenkins; D J Beard; J Gallagher; A J Price; C A F Dodd; J W Goodfellow; D W Murray
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2009-02

Review 4.  The Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a radiological perspective.

Authors:  K Mukherjee; H Pandit; C A F Dodd; S Ostlere; D W Murray
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 2.350

5.  Does new instrumentation improve radiologic alignment of the Oxford® medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Ki-Mo Jang; Hong Chul Lim; Seung-Beom Han; Chandong Jeong; Seul-Gi Kim; Ji-Hoon Bae
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2017-03-19       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum of ten years of follow-up.

Authors:  Richard A Berger; R Michael Meneghini; Joshua J Jacobs; Mitchell B Sheinkop; Craig J Della Valle; Aaron G Rosenberg; Jorge O Galante
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  A second decade lifetable survival analysis of the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Andrew J Price; Ulf Svard
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Superior femoral component alignment can be achieved with Oxford microplasty instrumentation after minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yihui Tu; Huaming Xue; Tong Ma; Tao Wen; Tao Yang; Hui Zhang; Minwei Cai
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  The clinical outcome of minimally invasive Phase 3 Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a 15-year follow-up of 1000 UKAs.

Authors:  H Pandit; T W Hamilton; C Jenkins; S J Mellon; C A F Dodd; D W Murray
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 5.082

10.  40 years of the Oxford Knee.

Authors:  W F M Jackson; K R Berend; S Spruijt
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 5.082

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Does new instrument for Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty improve short-term clinical outcome and component alignment? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiao Wei Sun; Fei Fan Lu; Kun Zou; Mao Hong; Qi Dong Zhang; Wan Shou Guo
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 2.359

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.