R Donald Harvey1, Noemi Reguart Aransay2, Nicolas Isambert3, Jong-Seok Lee4, Tobias Arkenau5, Johan Vansteenkiste6, Paul A Dickinson7, Khanh Bui8, Doris Weilert9, Karen So10, Karen Thomas11, Karthick Vishwanathan12. 1. Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA. 2. Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic Barcelona; Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapeutics in Solid Tumors, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain. 3. Department of Medical Oncology, Centre GF Leclerc, Dijon, France. 4. Seoul National University, Bundang Hospital, Seoul, South Korea. 5. Sarah Cannon Research Institute, London, UK. 6. Respiratory Oncology Unit (Respiratory Diseases), University Hospital KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. 7. Seda Pharmaceutical Development Services, Alderley Edge, UK. 8. Quantitative Clinical Pharmacology, AstraZeneca, Waltham, MA, USA. 9. IQVIA, Overland Park, KS, USA. 10. Global Medicines Development/Global Clinical Development, AstraZeneca, Royston, UK. 11. Biostatistics and Informatics, AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, UK. 12. Quantitative Clinical Pharmacology, Early Clinical Development, IMED Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, Waltham, MA, USA.
Abstract
AIM: We report on two Phase 1, open-label, single-arm studies assessing the effect of osimertinib on simvastatin (CYP3A substrate) and rosuvastatin (breast cancer resistance protein substrate [BCRP] substrate) exposure in patients with advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer who have progressed after treatment with an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, to determine, upon coadministration, whether osimertinib could affect the exposure of these agents. METHODS: Fifty-two patients in the CYP3A study (pharmacokinetic [PK] analysis, n = 49), and 44 patients in the BCRP study were dosed (PK analysis, n = 44). In the CYP3A study, patients received single doses of simvastatin 40 mg on Days 1 and 31, and osimertinib 80 mg once daily on Days 3-32. In the BCRP study, single doses of rosuvastatin 20 mg were given on Days 1 and 32, and osimertinib 80 mg once daily on Days 4-34. RESULTS: Geometric least squares mean (GLSM) ratios (90% confidence intervals) of simvastatin plus osimertinib for area under the plasma concentration-time curves from zero to infinity (AUC) were 91% (77-108): entirely contained within the predefined no relevant effect limits, and Cmax of 77% (63, 94) which was not contained within the limits. GLSM ratios of rosuvastatin plus osimertinib for AUC were 135% (115-157) and Cmax were 172 (146, 203): outside the no relevant effect limits. CONCLUSIONS: Osimertinib is unlikely to have any clinically relevant interaction with CYP3A substrates and has a weak inhibitory effect on BCRP. No new safety concerns were identified in either study.
AIM: We report on two Phase 1, open-label, single-arm studies assessing the effect of osimertinib on simvastatin (CYP3A substrate) and rosuvastatin (breast cancer resistance protein substrate [BCRP] substrate) exposure in patients with advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer who have progressed after treatment with an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, to determine, upon coadministration, whether osimertinib could affect the exposure of these agents. METHODS: Fifty-two patients in the CYP3A study (pharmacokinetic [PK] analysis, n = 49), and 44 patients in the BCRP study were dosed (PK analysis, n = 44). In the CYP3A study, patients received single doses of simvastatin 40 mg on Days 1 and 31, and osimertinib 80 mg once daily on Days 3-32. In the BCRP study, single doses of rosuvastatin 20 mg were given on Days 1 and 32, and osimertinib 80 mg once daily on Days 4-34. RESULTS: Geometric least squares mean (GLSM) ratios (90% confidence intervals) of simvastatin plus osimertinib for area under the plasma concentration-time curves from zero to infinity (AUC) were 91% (77-108): entirely contained within the predefined no relevant effect limits, and Cmax of 77% (63, 94) which was not contained within the limits. GLSM ratios of rosuvastatin plus osimertinib for AUC were 135% (115-157) and Cmax were 172 (146, 203): outside the no relevant effect limits. CONCLUSIONS: Osimertinib is unlikely to have any clinically relevant interaction with CYP3A substrates and has a weak inhibitory effect on BCRP. No new safety concerns were identified in either study.
Authors: S Novello; F Barlesi; R Califano; T Cufer; S Ekman; M Giaj Levra; K Kerr; S Popat; M Reck; S Senan; G V Simo; J Vansteenkiste; S Peters Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Sunny Wang; Melisa L Wong; Nathan Hamilton; J Ben Davoren; Thierry M Jahan; Louise C Walter Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-03-26 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Maria E Arcila; Geoffrey R Oxnard; Khedoudja Nafa; Gregory J Riely; Stephen B Solomon; Maureen F Zakowski; Mark G Kris; William Pao; Vincent A Miller; Marc Ladanyi Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2011-01-19 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Helena A Yu; Maria E Arcila; Natasha Rekhtman; Camelia S Sima; Maureen F Zakowski; William Pao; Mark G Kris; Vincent A Miller; Marc Ladanyi; Gregory J Riely Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2013-03-07 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: David Planchard; Kathryn H Brown; Dong-Wan Kim; Sang-We Kim; Yuichiro Ohe; Enriqueta Felip; Philip Leese; Mireille Cantarini; Karthick Vishwanathan; Pasi A Jänne; Malcolm Ranson; Paul A Dickinson Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2016-02-22 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Peter Ballard; James W T Yates; Zhenfan Yang; Dong-Wan Kim; James Chih-Hsin Yang; Mireille Cantarini; Kathryn Pickup; Angela Jordan; Mike Hickey; Matthew Grist; Matthew Box; Peter Johnström; Katarina Varnäs; Jonas Malmquist; Kenneth S Thress; Pasi A Jänne; Darren Cross Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2016-07-19 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Dominique A Garrison; Zahra Talebi; Eric D Eisenmann; Alex Sparreboom; Sharyn D Baker Journal: Pharmaceutics Date: 2020-09-09 Impact factor: 6.321