PURPOSE: Because comorbidity affects cancer treatment outcomes, guidelines recommend considering comorbidity when making treatment decisions in older patients with lung cancer. Yet, it is unclear whether treatment is targeted to healthier older adults who might reasonably benefit. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Receipt of first-line guideline-recommended treatment was assessed for 20,511 veterans age ≥ 65 years with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the Veterans Affairs (VA) Central Cancer Registry from 2003 to 2008. Patients were stratified by age (65 to 74, 75 to 84, ≥ 85 years), Charlson comorbidity index score (0, 1 to 3, ≥ 4), and American Joint Committee on Cancer stage (I to II, IIIA to IIIB, IIIB with malignant effusion to IV). Comorbidity and patient characteristics were obtained from VA claims and registry data. Multivariate analysis identified predictors of receipt of guideline-recommended treatment. RESULTS: In all, 51% of patients with local, 35% with regional, and 27% with metastatic disease received guideline-recommended treatment. Treatment rates decreased more with advancing age than with worsening comorbidity for all stages, such that older patients with no comorbidity had lower rates than younger patients with severe comorbidity. For example, 50% of patients with local disease age 75 to 84 years with no comorbidity received surgery compared with 57% of patients age 65 to 74 years with severe comorbidity (P < .001). In multivariate analysis, age and histology remained strong negative predictors of treatment for all stages, whereas comorbidity and nonclinical factors had a minor effect. CONCLUSION: Advancing age is a much stronger negative predictor of treatment receipt among older veterans with NSCLC than comorbidity. Individualized decisions that go beyond age and include comorbidity are needed to better target NSCLC treatments to older patients who may reasonably benefit.
PURPOSE: Because comorbidity affects cancer treatment outcomes, guidelines recommend considering comorbidity when making treatment decisions in older patients with lung cancer. Yet, it is unclear whether treatment is targeted to healthier older adults who might reasonably benefit. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Receipt of first-line guideline-recommended treatment was assessed for 20,511 veterans age ≥ 65 years with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the Veterans Affairs (VA) Central Cancer Registry from 2003 to 2008. Patients were stratified by age (65 to 74, 75 to 84, ≥ 85 years), Charlson comorbidity index score (0, 1 to 3, ≥ 4), and American Joint Committee on Cancer stage (I to II, IIIA to IIIB, IIIB with malignant effusion to IV). Comorbidity and patient characteristics were obtained from VA claims and registry data. Multivariate analysis identified predictors of receipt of guideline-recommended treatment. RESULTS: In all, 51% of patients with local, 35% with regional, and 27% with metastatic disease received guideline-recommended treatment. Treatment rates decreased more with advancing age than with worsening comorbidity for all stages, such that older patients with no comorbidity had lower rates than younger patients with severe comorbidity. For example, 50% of patients with local disease age 75 to 84 years with no comorbidity received surgery compared with 57% of patients age 65 to 74 years with severe comorbidity (P < .001). In multivariate analysis, age and histology remained strong negative predictors of treatment for all stages, whereas comorbidity and nonclinical factors had a minor effect. CONCLUSION: Advancing age is a much stronger negative predictor of treatment receipt among older veterans with NSCLC than comorbidity. Individualized decisions that go beyond age and include comorbidity are needed to better target NSCLC treatments to older patients who may reasonably benefit.
Authors: Carlos M Mery; Anastasia N Pappas; Raphael Bueno; Yolonda L Colson; Philip Linden; David J Sugarbaker; Michael T Jaklitsch Journal: Chest Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Sydney M Dy; Phoebe Sharkey; Robert Herbert; Kathleen Haddad; Albert W Wu Journal: Crit Rev Oncol Hematol Date: 2006-07-07 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: T J Smith; L Penberthy; C E Desch; M Whittemore; C Newschaffer; B E Hillner; D McClish; S M Retchin Journal: Lung Cancer Date: 1995-12 Impact factor: 5.705
Authors: Timothy Winton; Robert Livingston; David Johnson; James Rigas; Michael Johnston; Charles Butts; Yvon Cormier; Glenwood Goss; Richard Inculet; Eric Vallieres; Willard Fry; Drew Bethune; Joseph Ayoub; Keyue Ding; Lesley Seymour; Barbara Graham; Ming-Sound Tsao; David Gandara; Kenneth Kesler; Todd Demmy; Frances Shepherd Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-06-23 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Guilherme Jorge Costa; Maria Júlia Gonçalves de Mello; Carlos Gil Ferreira; Luiz Claudio Santos Thuler Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2017-04-07 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Jacob E Berchuck; Craig S Meyer; Ning Zhang; Caroline M Berchuck; Neil N Trivedi; Beth Cohen; Sunny Wang Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2020-07-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Debra P Ritzwoller; Nikki M Carroll; Thomas Delate; Mark C Hornbrook; Lawrence Kushi; Erin J Aiello Bowles; Jared M Freml; Karl Huang; Elizabeth T Loggers Journal: Lung Cancer Date: 2012-09-27 Impact factor: 5.705
Authors: Melisa L Wong; Timothy L McMurry; George J Stukenborg; Amanda B Francescatti; Carla Amato-Martz; Jessica R Schumacher; George J Chang; Caprice C Greenberg; David P Winchester; Daniel P McKellar; Louise C Walter; Benjamin D Kozower Journal: Lung Cancer Date: 2016-11-09 Impact factor: 5.705
Authors: Valentin Goede; Paula Cramer; Raymonde Busch; Manuela Bergmann; Martina Stauch; Georg Hopfinger; Stephan Stilgenbauer; Hartmut Döhner; Anne Westermann; Clemens M Wendtner; Barbara Eichhorst; Michael Hallek Journal: Haematologica Date: 2014-02-28 Impact factor: 9.941
Authors: Mark Zaki; Michael Dominello; Gregory Dyson; Shirish Gadgeel; Antoinette Wozniak; Steven Miller; Peter Paximadis Journal: Clin Lung Cancer Date: 2016-07-22 Impact factor: 4.785
Authors: Mani Keshtgarpour; Wei Seong Tan; Jack Zwanziger; Saria Awadalla; Fredrick G Langi; Arkadiusz Z Dudek Journal: Anticancer Res Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 2.480