PURPOSE: All patients with EGF receptor (EGFR)-mutant lung cancers eventually develop acquired resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). Smaller series have identified various mechanisms of resistance, but systematic evaluation of a large number of patients to definitively establish the frequency of various mechanisms has not been conducted. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with lung adenocarcinomas and acquired resistance to erlotinib or gefitinib enrolled onto a prospective biopsy protocol and underwent a rebiopsy after the development of acquired resistance. Histology was reviewed. Samples underwent genotyping for mutations in EGFR, AKT1, BRAF, ERBB2, KRAS, MEK1, NRAS and PIK3CA, and FISH for MET and HER2. RESULTS: Adequate tumor samples for molecular analysis were obtained in 155 patients. Ninety-eight had second-site EGFR T790M mutations [63%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 55%-70%] and four had small cell transformation (3%, 95% CI, 0%-6%). MET amplification was seen in 4 of 75 (5%; 95% CI, 1%-13%). HER2 amplification was seen in 3 of 24 (13%; 95% CI, 3%-32%). We did not detect any acquired mutations in PIK3CA, AKT1, BRAF, ERBB2, KRAS, MEK1, or NRAS (0 of 88, 0%; 95% CI, 0%-4%). Overlap among mechanisms of acquired resistance was seen in 4%. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest series reporting mechanisms of acquired resistance to EGFR-TKI therapy. We identified EGFR T790M as the most common mechanism of acquired resistance, whereas MET amplification, HER2 amplification, and small cell histologic transformation occur less frequently. More comprehensive methods to characterize molecular alterations in this setting are needed to improve our understanding of acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs.
PURPOSE: All patients with EGF receptor (EGFR)-mutant lung cancers eventually develop acquired resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). Smaller series have identified various mechanisms of resistance, but systematic evaluation of a large number of patients to definitively establish the frequency of various mechanisms has not been conducted. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN:Patients with lung adenocarcinomas and acquired resistance to erlotinib or gefitinib enrolled onto a prospective biopsy protocol and underwent a rebiopsy after the development of acquired resistance. Histology was reviewed. Samples underwent genotyping for mutations in EGFR, AKT1, BRAF, ERBB2, KRAS, MEK1, NRAS and PIK3CA, and FISH for MET and HER2. RESULTS: Adequate tumor samples for molecular analysis were obtained in 155 patients. Ninety-eight had second-site EGFRT790M mutations [63%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 55%-70%] and four had small cell transformation (3%, 95% CI, 0%-6%). MET amplification was seen in 4 of 75 (5%; 95% CI, 1%-13%). HER2 amplification was seen in 3 of 24 (13%; 95% CI, 3%-32%). We did not detect any acquired mutations in PIK3CA, AKT1, BRAF, ERBB2, KRAS, MEK1, or NRAS (0 of 88, 0%; 95% CI, 0%-4%). Overlap among mechanisms of acquired resistance was seen in 4%. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest series reporting mechanisms of acquired resistance to EGFR-TKI therapy. We identified EGFRT790M as the most common mechanism of acquired resistance, whereas MET amplification, HER2 amplification, and small cell histologic transformation occur less frequently. More comprehensive methods to characterize molecular alterations in this setting are needed to improve our understanding of acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs.
Authors: Susumu Kobayashi; Titus J Boggon; Tajhal Dayaram; Pasi A Jänne; Olivier Kocher; Matthew Meyerson; Bruce E Johnson; Michael J Eck; Daniel G Tenen; Balázs Halmos Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-02-24 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Federico Cappuzzo; Marileila Varella-Garcia; Hisayuki Shigematsu; Irene Domenichini; Stefania Bartolini; Giovanni L Ceresoli; Elisa Rossi; Vienna Ludovini; Vanesa Gregorc; Luca Toschi; Wilbur A Franklin; Lucio Crino; Adi F Gazdar; Paul A Bunn; Fred R Hirsch Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-08-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Marissa N Balak; Yixuan Gong; Gregory J Riely; Romel Somwar; Allan R Li; Maureen F Zakowski; Anne Chiang; Guangli Yang; Ouathek Ouerfelli; Mark G Kris; Marc Ladanyi; Vincent A Miller; William Pao Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2006-11-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Jeffrey A Engelman; Kreshnik Zejnullahu; Tetsuya Mitsudomi; Youngchul Song; Courtney Hyland; Joon Oh Park; Neal Lindeman; Christopher-Michael Gale; Xiaojun Zhao; James Christensen; Takayuki Kosaka; Alison J Holmes; Andrew M Rogers; Federico Cappuzzo; Tony Mok; Charles Lee; Bruce E Johnson; Lewis C Cantley; Pasi A Jänne Journal: Science Date: 2007-04-26 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Gregory J Riely; William Pao; Duykhanh Pham; Allan R Li; Naiyer Rizvi; Ennapadam S Venkatraman; Maureen F Zakowski; Mark G Kris; Marc Ladanyi; Vincent A Miller Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2006-02-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: William Pao; Vincent A Miller; Katerina A Politi; Gregory J Riely; Romel Somwar; Maureen F Zakowski; Mark G Kris; Harold Varmus Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2005-02-22 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Melissa L Johnson; Helena A Yu; Eric M Hart; Bing Bing Weitner; Alfred W Rademaker; Jyoti D Patel; Mark G Kris; Gregory J Riely Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-04-13 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Michael Offin; Joseph M Chan; Megan Tenet; Hira A Rizvi; Ronglai Shen; Gregory J Riely; Natasha Rekhtman; Yahya Daneshbod; Alvaro Quintanal-Villalonga; Alexander Penson; Matthew D Hellmann; Maria E Arcila; Marc Ladanyi; Dana Pe'er; Mark G Kris; Charles M Rudin; Helena A Yu Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2019-06-19 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Ken Suzawa; Michael Offin; Daniel Lu; Christopher Kurzatkowski; Morana Vojnic; Roger S Smith; Joshua K Sabari; Huichun Tai; Marissa Mattar; Inna Khodos; Elisa de Stanchina; Charles M Rudin; Mark G Kris; Maria E Arcila; William W Lockwood; Alexander Drilon; Marc Ladanyi; Romel Somwar Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-10-23 Impact factor: 12.531