Literature DB >> 30171528

Applying analytical decision methods for determination of the best treatment alternative to remove emerging micropollutants from drinking water and wastewater: triclosan example.

Emrah Ozturk1.   

Abstract

Increasing human activities have not only substantially altered the natural material cycle but also created new synthetic chemicals flows. Some of these chemicals, which are described as micropollutants (MPs), may result in adverse effects on human health, aquatic organisms, and ecosystems. MPs can be transported to the environment and water resources in a variety ways including domestic and industrial wastewater. Unfortunately, most MPs are only partially removed in existing conventional treatment plants. Therefore, conventional treatment plants should be modernized by advanced treatment technologies to protect the environment and human health. However, there are various mysteries about best treatment techniques, evaluation criteria, and decision-making methods. In this study, it was aimed to determine the best treatment alternatives for triclosan (TCS) which is one of the priority MPs. A total of 18 evaluation criteria were identified and prioritized by employing analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and entropy methods. Treatment alternatives were identified and their performance was assessed through a comprehensive literature investigation. In decision-making processes of determining these alternatives, "technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS)," "preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluation (PROMETHEE)," and "Višekriterijumsko kompromisno rangiranje (VIKOR)" analytical decision-making methods were employed, and priority rankings were determined according to each decision method. The final priority ranking was found as adsorption > membrane filtration > hybrid processes > advanced oxidation processes > constructed wetlands > conventional treatment processes > biological treatment > other treatment processes. Although the obtained results are specific to TCS, the employed analytical decision methods can be also used to decide the best treatment alternatives for other MPs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drinking water; Micropollutant; PROMETHEE; TOPSIS; Treatment; Triclosan; VIKOR; Wastewater

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30171528     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-3036-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  52 in total

1.  QSAR models for the removal of organic micropollutants in four different river water matrices.

Authors:  Sairam Sudhakaran; James Calvin; Gary L Amy
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2012-01-14       Impact factor: 7.086

2.  Fate and mass balance of triclosan and its degradation products: Comparison of three different types of wastewater treatments and aerobic/anaerobic sludge digestion.

Authors:  Fatemeh Tohidi; Zongwei Cai
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 10.588

3.  Selection of an appropriate wastewater treatment technology: a scenario-based multiple-attribute decision-making approach.

Authors:  Pradip P Kalbar; Subhankar Karmakar; Shyam R Asolekar
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 6.789

4.  Reprint of: Removal and formation of chlorinated triclosan derivatives in wastewater treatment plants using chlorine and UV disinfection.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Buth; Michael R Ross; Kristopher McNeill; William A Arnold
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 7.086

5.  Oxidative removal of selected endocrine-disruptors and pharmaceuticals in drinking water treatment systems, and identification of degradation products of triclosan.

Authors:  Qihua Wu; Honglan Shi; Craig D Adams; Terry Timmons; Yinfa Ma
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 7.963

6.  Removal of trimethoprim, sulfamethoxazole, and triclosan by the green alga Nannochloris sp.

Authors:  Xuelian Bai; Kumud Acharya
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 10.588

7.  Degradation of triclosan and triclocarban and formation of transformation products in activated sludge using benchtop bioreactors.

Authors:  Dana L Armstrong; Nuria Lozano; Clifford P Rice; Mark Ramirez; Alba Torrents
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 6.498

8.  Removal of triclosan in nitrifying activated sludge: effects of ammonia amendment and bioaugmentation.

Authors:  Do Gyun Lee; Kun-Ching Cho; Kung-Hui Chu
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 7.086

Review 9.  Progress in the biological and chemical treatment technologies for emerging contaminant removal from wastewater: A critical review.

Authors:  Mohammad Boshir Ahmed; John L Zhou; Huu Hao Ngo; Wenshan Guo; Nikolaos S Thomaidis; Jiang Xu
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 10.588

10.  Fate of Triclocarban, Triclosan and Methyltriclosan during wastewater and biosolids treatment processes.

Authors:  Nuria Lozano; Clifford P Rice; Mark Ramirez; Alba Torrents
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 11.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.