Literature DB >> 23764601

Fate of Triclocarban, Triclosan and Methyltriclosan during wastewater and biosolids treatment processes.

Nuria Lozano1, Clifford P Rice, Mark Ramirez, Alba Torrents.   

Abstract

Triclocarban (TCC) and Triclosan (TCS) are two antibacterial chemicals present in household and personal care products. Methyltriclosan is a biodegradation product of TCS formed under aerobic conditions. TCC and TCS are discharged to Waste Water Treatment Plants (WWTP) where they are removed from the liquid phase mainly by concentrating in the solids. This study presents a thorough investigation of TCC, TCS and MeTCS concentrations in the liquid phase (dissolved + particulate) as well as solid phases within a single, large WWTP in the U.S. Total TCC and TCS concentrations decreased by >97% with about 79% of TCC and 64% of TCS transferred to the solids. The highest TCC and TCS removal rates from the liquid phase were reached in the primary treatment mainly though sorption and settling of solids. The TCC mass balances showed that TCC levels remain unchanged through the secondary treatment (activated sludge process) and about an 18% decrease was observed through the nitrification-denitrification process. On the other hand, TCS levels decreased in both processes (secondary and nitrification-denitrification) by 10.4 and 22.6%, respectively. The decrease in TCS levels associated with observed increased levels of MeTCS in secondary and nitrification-denitrification processes providing evidence of TCS biotransformation. Dissolved-phase concentrations of TCC and TCS remained constant during filtration and disinfection. TCC and TCS highest sludge concentrations were analyzed in the primary sludge (13.1 ± 0.9 μg g(-1) dry wt. for TCC and 20.3 ± 0.9 μg g(-1) dry wt. for TCS) but for MeTCS the highest concentrations were analyzed in the secondary sludge (0.25 ± 0.04 μg g(-1) dry wt.). Respective TCC, TCS and MeTCS concentrations of 4.15 ± 0.77; 5.37 ± 0.97 and 0.058 ± 0.003 kg d(-1) are leaving the WWTP with the sludge and 0.13 ± 0.01; 0.24 ± 0.07 and 0.021 ± 0.002 kg d(-1) with the effluent that is discharged.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mass-balance; Methyltriclosan; Triclocarban; Triclosan; WWTP

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23764601     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.05.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  19 in total

1.  The influence of solid-liquid coefficient in the fate of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in aerobic wastewater treatment.

Authors:  Rafael D Kramer; Tais C Filippe; Marcelo R Prado; Júlio César R de Azevedo
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Comparison of hepatotoxicity and mechanisms induced by triclosan (TCS) and methyl-triclosan (MTCS) in human liver hepatocellular HepG2 cells.

Authors:  Lu Wang; Boyu Mao; Huixin He; Yu Shang; Yufang Zhong; Zhiqiang Yu; Yiting Yang; Hui Li; Jing An
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 3.524

3.  Occurrence and removal of triclosan in Canadian wastewater systems.

Authors:  Paula Guerra; Steven Teslic; Ariba Shah; Amber Albert; Sarah B Gewurtz; Shirley Anne Smyth
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Basin-scale emission and multimedia fate of triclosan in whole China.

Authors:  Qian-Qian Zhang; Guang-Guo Ying; Zhi-Feng Chen; Jian-Liang Zhao; You-Sheng Liu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 5.  Triclosan exposure, transformation, and human health effects.

Authors:  Lisa M Weatherly; Julie A Gosse
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 6.393

6.  Effects of applying biosolids to soils on the adsorption and bioavailability of 17α-ethinylestradiol and triclosan in wheat plants.

Authors:  Romina Cantarero; Pablo Richter; Sally Brown; Loreto Ascar; Inés Ahumada
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Applying analytical decision methods for determination of the best treatment alternative to remove emerging micropollutants from drinking water and wastewater: triclosan example.

Authors:  Emrah Ozturk
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Antimicrobial agent triclosan is a proton ionophore uncoupler of mitochondria in living rat and human mast cells and in primary human keratinocytes.

Authors:  Lisa M Weatherly; Juyoung Shim; Hina N Hashmi; Rachel H Kennedy; Samuel T Hess; Julie A Gosse
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 3.446

9.  Uptake and accumulation of antimicrobials, triclocarban and triclosan, by food crops in a hydroponic system.

Authors:  Shiny Mathews; Shannon Henderson; Dawn Reinhold
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-01-25       Impact factor: 4.223

10.  Fate of triclocarban in agricultural soils after biosolid applications.

Authors:  Nuria Lozano; Clifford P Rice; Mark Ramirez; Alba Torrents
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 4.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.