Literature DB >> 27166780

Fate and mass balance of triclosan and its degradation products: Comparison of three different types of wastewater treatments and aerobic/anaerobic sludge digestion.

Fatemeh Tohidi1, Zongwei Cai2.   

Abstract

Triclosan (TCS) as an antimicrobial agent has been ubiquitously found in wastewater and sewage sludge. TCS may undergo transformation/degradation during wastewater treatment. Some of the resulted products such as 2,4-dichlorophenol (2,4-DCP), 2,8-dichlorodibenzoparadioxin (2,8-DCDD) and methyl triclosan (MTCS) are presumed toxic/persistent compounds. In this study, fate of TCS and the probability of formation of important degradation products were investigated in three susceptible wastewater/sludge treatment practices. 24.1% and 27.2% of the loading TCS was adsorbed to the generated sludge, whereas up to 60% of the loading TCS was biotransformed. Up to 9.9% and 13.0% of TCS loss was attributed to the formation of 2,4-DCP and 2,8-DCDD in chlorination and UV disinfection, respectively. Anaerobic and aerobic sludge digestion processes eliminated up to 23.0% and 56.0% of TCS, respectively. About 7.4% of TCS in aerobic digestion was transformed to methyl triclosan (MTCS). Significant temporal variation of TCS was observed in primary sedimentations, except for chemically enhanced primary treatment that was suggested to be governed by chemical-forced sedimentation. Distribution coefficient (Kd) of TCS was directly correlated to the total organic carbon of the sludge (TOC). Moreover, strong correlation was observed between elimination efficiency in primary sedimentation and loading concentration. Copyright Â
© 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  2,4-Dicholorophenol; 2,8-Dichlorodibenzoparadioxin; Biodegradation; Distribution coefficient; Mass balance; Sewage treatment plant; Triclosan

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27166780     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.04.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hazard Mater        ISSN: 0304-3894            Impact factor:   10.588


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of hepatotoxicity and mechanisms induced by triclosan (TCS) and methyl-triclosan (MTCS) in human liver hepatocellular HepG2 cells.

Authors:  Lu Wang; Boyu Mao; Huixin He; Yu Shang; Yufang Zhong; Zhiqiang Yu; Yiting Yang; Hui Li; Jing An
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 3.524

2.  Occurrence and removal of triclosan in Canadian wastewater systems.

Authors:  Paula Guerra; Steven Teslic; Ariba Shah; Amber Albert; Sarah B Gewurtz; Shirley Anne Smyth
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Applying analytical decision methods for determination of the best treatment alternative to remove emerging micropollutants from drinking water and wastewater: triclosan example.

Authors:  Emrah Ozturk
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 4.  Triclosan in water, implications for human and environmental health.

Authors:  L W B Olaniyan; N Mkwetshana; A I Okoh
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-09-21

Review 5.  A Review on the Fate of Legacy and Alternative Antimicrobials and Their Metabolites during Wastewater and Sludge Treatment.

Authors:  Timothy Abbott; Gokce Kor-Bicakci; Mohammad S Islam; Cigdem Eskicioglu
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Occurrence of the Persistent Antimicrobial Triclosan in Microwave Pretreated and Anaerobically Digested Municipal Sludges under Various Process Conditions.

Authors:  Gokce Kor-Bicakci; Timothy Abbott; Emine Ubay-Cokgor; Cigdem Eskicioglu
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-01-12       Impact factor: 4.411

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.