Literature DB >> 23023038

Selection of an appropriate wastewater treatment technology: a scenario-based multiple-attribute decision-making approach.

Pradip P Kalbar1, Subhankar Karmakar, Shyam R Asolekar.   

Abstract

Many technological alternatives for wastewater treatment are available, ranging from advanced technologies to conventional treatment options. It is difficult to select the most appropriate technology from among a set of available alternatives to treat wastewater at a particular location. Many factors, such as capital costs, operation and maintenance costs and land requirement, are involved in the decision-making process. Sustainability criteria must also be incorporated into the decision-making process such that appropriate technologies are selected for developing economies such as that of India. A scenario-based multiple-attribute decision-making (MADM) methodology has been developed and applied to the selection of wastewater treatment alternative. The four most commonly used wastewater treatment technologies for treatment of municipal wastewater in India are ranked for various scenarios. Six scenarios are developed that capture the regional and local societal priorities of urban, suburban and rural areas and translate them into the mathematical algorithm of the MADM methodology. The articulated scenarios depict the most commonly encountered decision-making situations in addressing technology selection for wastewater treatment in India. A widely used compensatory MADM technique, TOPSIS, has been selected to rank the alternatives. Seven criteria with twelve indicators are formulated to evaluate the alternatives. Different weight matrices are used for each scenario, depending on the priorities of the scenario. This study shows that it is difficult to select the most appropriate wastewater treatment alternative under the "no scenario" condition (equal weights given to each attribute), and the decision-making methodology presented in this paper effectively identifies the most appropriate wastewater treatment alternative for each of the scenarios.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23023038     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.08.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  6 in total

1.  High-rate activated sludge processes for municipal wastewater treatment: the effect of food waste addition and hydraulic limits of the system.

Authors:  Huseyin Guven; Hale Ozgun; Mustafa Evren Ersahin; Recep Kaan Dereli; Ilknur Sinop; Izzet Ozturk
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Applying analytical decision methods for determination of the best treatment alternative to remove emerging micropollutants from drinking water and wastewater: triclosan example.

Authors:  Emrah Ozturk
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 3.  Assessing the Best Supplier Selection Criteria in Supply Chain Management During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Yumei Hou; Maryam Khokhar; Sayma Zia; Anshuman Sharma
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-29

4.  Reuse-focused selection of appropriate technologies for municipal wastewater treatment: a multi-criteria approach.

Authors:  R R Srivastava; P K Singh
Journal:  Int J Environ Sci Technol (Tehran)       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 3.519

5.  The Circular Decision-Making Tree: an Operational Framework.

Authors:  Rachel Greer; Timo von Wirth; Derk Loorbach
Journal:  Circ Econ Sustain       Date:  2022-09-21

Review 6.  Cosmetic wastewater treatment technologies: a review.

Authors:  Despina A Gkika; Athanasios C Mitropoulos; Dimitra A Lambropoulou; Ioannis K Kalavrouziotis; George Z Kyzas
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 5.190

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.