Literature DB >> 35347294

Complications and post-operative interventions in XEN45 gel stent implantation in the treatment of open angle glaucoma-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Bjorn Kaijun Betzler1, Sheng Yang Lim2, Boon Ang Lim3, Vivien Cherng Hui Yip3, Bryan Chin Hou Ang4,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The XEN45 Gel Stent is a subconjunctival filtering device that has demonstrated promising efficacy. This meta-analysis quantitatively evaluates reported complications and interventions after XEN45 implantation in the treatment of open angle glaucoma (OAG).
METHODS: Pilot, cohort, observational studies, and randomised controlled trials that included at least ten patients undergoing ab interno or externo XEN45 surgery, with or without phacoemulsification were deemed eligible for inclusion. A meta-analysis of proportions with random-effect models was performed using the meta routine in R version 3.2.1. Outcomes included the rate of complications and post-operative interventions.
RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-two studies were identified on initial literature search and 33 were included in final analysis. Numerical hypotony was the most common post-operative complication, involving 20% of patients (95% CI: 10-31%). Post-operative gross hyphema occurred in 14% (95% CI: 7-22%) and transient intra-ocular pressure (IOP) spikes (>30 mmHg) in 13% (95% CI: 4-27%). Stent exposure occurred in 1% (95% CI: 0-2%). Stent migration occurred in 1% (95% CI: 0-3%). XEN45 revision and/or a second XEN45 implantation was performed in 5% of patients (95% CI: 3-7%). Stent relocation was performed in 3% (95% CI: 1-7%). A second glaucoma procedure was performed in 11% (95% CI: 8-15%). 26% underwent one (95% CI: 17-36%), 13% underwent two (95% CI: 5-24%) while 4% underwent three (95% CI: 2-6%) bleb needling procedures. 35% of patients (95% CI: 29-40%) required at least one needling. The average rate of needling per patient was 0.38 (95% CI: 0.20-0.59). However, there is a lack of high-quality data, with 8 of the 33 studies assessed to have a moderate to high risk of bias.
CONCLUSIONS: While literature suggests that XEN45 Gel Stent implantation is safe in the treatment of OAG, the overall current level of evidence is low and further studies are needed. More than a third of patients require at least one post-operative bleb needling procedure.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Royal College of Ophthalmologists.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35347294     DOI: 10.1038/s41433-022-02022-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  59 in total

Review 1.  Micro-invasive glaucoma surgery: current perspectives and future directions.

Authors:  Hady Saheb; Iqbal Ike K Ahmed
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.761

Review 2.  Novel glaucoma procedures: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

Authors:  Brian A Francis; Kuldev Singh; Shan C Lin; Elizabeth Hodapp; Henry D Jampel; John R Samples; Scott D Smith
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 12.079

3.  Intraocular pressure control and long-term visual field loss in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study.

Authors:  David C Musch; Brenda W Gillespie; Leslie M Niziol; Paul R Lichter; Rohit Varma
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  XEN implant device versus trabeculectomy, either alone or in combination with phacoemulsification, in open-angle glaucoma patients.

Authors:  María Teresa Marcos Parra; Javier Alejandro Salinas López; Noelia Soledad López Grau; Ana María Ceausescu; Juan José Pérez Santonja
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 5.  XEN Implant for Glaucoma Treatment: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Aikaterini Chatzara; Irini Chronopoulou; George Theodossiadis; Panagiotis Theodossiadis; Irini Chatziralli
Journal:  Semin Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 1.975

6.  The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020.

Authors:  H A Quigley; A T Broman
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Patient satisfaction with glaucoma therapy: reality or myth?

Authors:  Hans G Lemij; Juliette Gmm Hoevenaars; Cees van der Windt; Christophe Baudouin
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-05-04

8.  Micro-invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS): a review of surgical procedures using stents.

Authors:  Lutz E Pillunat; Carl Erb; Anselm Gm Jünemann; Friedemann Kimmich
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-08-29

9.  Efficacy and safety of XEN®-Implantation vs. trabeculectomy: Data of a "real-world" setting.

Authors:  Felix Mathias Wagner; Alexander Karl-Georg Schuster; Julia Emmerich; Panagiotis Chronopoulos; Esther Maria Hoffmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Minimally-invasive glaucoma surgeries (MIGS) for open angle glaucoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Carlo Lavia; Laura Dallorto; Milena Maule; Manuela Ceccarelli; Antonio Maria Fea
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.