Yael Tsarfati1, Shaked Rosenne1, Haim Weissman1, Linda J W Shimon2, Dvir Gur3, Benjamin A Palmer4, Boris Rybtchinski1. 1. Department of Organic Chemistry, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel. 2. Department of Chemical Research Support, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel. 3. Departments of Physics of Complex Systems and Molecular Cell Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel. 4. Department of Structural Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel.
Abstract
Organic crystals are of primary importance in pharmaceuticals, functional materials, and biological systems; however, organic crystallization mechanisms are not well-understood. It has been recognized that "nonclassical" organic crystallization from solution involving transient amorphous precursors is ubiquitous. Understanding how these precursors evolve into crystals is a key challenge. Here, we uncover the crystallization mechanisms of two simple aromatic compounds (perylene diimides), employing direct structural imaging by cryogenic electron microscopy. We reveal the continuous evolution of density, morphology, and order during the crystallization of very different amorphous precursors (well-defined aggregates and diffuse dense liquid phase). Crystallization starts from initial densification of the precursors. Subsequent evolution of crystalline order is gradual, involving further densification concurrent with optimization of molecular ordering and morphology. These findings may have implications for the rational design of organic crystals.
Organic crystals are of primary importance in pharmaceuticals, functional materials, and biological systems; however, organic crystallization mechanisms are not well-understood. It has been recognized that "nonclassical" organic crystallization from solution involving transient amorphous precursors is ubiquitous. Understanding how these precursors evolve into crystals is a key challenge. Here, we uncover the crystallization mechanisms of two simple aromatic compounds (perylene diimides), employing direct structural imaging by cryogenic electron microscopy. We reveal the continuous evolution of density, morphology, and order during the crystallization of very different amorphous precursors (well-defined aggregates and diffuse dense liquid phase). Crystallization starts from initial densification of the precursors. Subsequent evolution of crystalline order is gradual, involving further densification concurrent with optimization of molecular ordering and morphology. These findings may have implications for the rational design of organic crystals.
Obtaining a comprehensive
picture of how molecular or atomic order
evolves during crystallization is a long-standing challenge. It has
been recognized recently that “nonclassical” crystallization
from solution involving transient amorphous precursor phases[1−5] and particle attachment is commonplace.[6] Understanding the morphological and structural properties of these
precursors, and how they evolve into crystals, is a key challenge
in inorganic,[7−10] protein,[11−14] and organic crystallization.[15−18] The mechanistic picture of organic crystallization
is lacking, as dissimilarity of the initially formed amorphous phases
and how they transform into crystals have not been elucidated.[3] Herein, we present a study on the crystallization
of common organic dyes—perylene diimides (PDIs). Direct structural
imaging of two crystallization processes, which involve very different
amorphous precursors (well-defined aggregates and diffuse liquidlike
state), elucidates a common mechanism of crystalline order development.
We observe that, in both precursor scenarios, PDI crystallization
proceeds via initial densification of prenucleation aggregates, followed
by gradual ordering concomitant with continuous densification and
change in morphology. This mechanistic picture reveals that density,
molecular ordering, and morphology are intimately connected and develop
gradually, providing a unifying view on how different amorphous precursors
convert into crystals.
Results and Discussion
PDI crystallization
is of primary importance in industrial pigments
and organic electronic devices.[19] Simple
PDI derivatives 1 and 2 (Figures A and 3A) were chosen for our study as prototypical aromatic molecules.
These compounds allow observation of stable prenucleation states due
to strong hydrophobic interactions in the initially formed aggregates
(Figure D).[20] Their transformation into crystals was
studied by electron microscopy imaging (see below). Water/tetrahydrofuran
(THF) solvent mixtures are used as crystallization media, where the
THF is a good solvent for PDIs, which enables to control the stability
of the initially formed aggregates. The aggregation-sensitive optical
properties of PDI molecules enable spectroscopic follow up of the
crystallization process, complementing the insights obtained from
imaging.
Figure 1
(A) Molecular structure of 1. (B) UV–vis spectra
of 1 recorded during crystallization: 0 (blue), 24 (red),
5, 7, 9, 11, and 15h (top to bottom in gray). (C) Absorption
intensity at 530 nm over time (dots—measurements every 5 min).
(D) Schematic of the free-energy profile for the crystallization of 1.
Figure 3
Cryo-TEM images,
crystallization of 2. (A) Molecular
structure of compound 2 and its UV–vis spectra
in water/THF = 7/3 (v/v) mixture, 10–5 M, immediately
after preparation (blue), and after 3 h (red). (B–H) Cryo-TEM
images of 2 in water/THF = 1/1 (v/v) mixture, 10–4 M. (B) Unstructured amorphous liquidlike aggregate
(30 min of aging). (C) Dense elongated structure forming within the
amorphous aggregate (30 min of aging). (D–H) Early order evolution
stages (30 min of aging). (D) Underformed needle shrouded in remains
of an amorphous aggregate. (E, F) Magnified views of the areas marked
in parts D and E, respectively. (F) Fibrous features within the underformed
needle are indicated by red arrows. (G) Underformed needle shrouded
in an amorphous phase. An amorphous aggregate is indicated by a red
arrow. (H) Magnified view of the area marked in G showing fibrous
features composing the evolving crystal. (I) 2 in water/THF
= 7/3 (v/v) mixture, 10–5 M, showing an underformed
needle shrouded in amorphous phase (30 min of aging). Top inset: magnified
view of the marked area. Scale bar is 30 nm. Bottom inset: FFT analysis
of the marked area showing lattice fringes periodicity of 1.1 and
1.6 nm. Scale bar is 1 nm–1.
(A) Molecular structure of 1. (B) UV–vis spectra
of 1 recorded during crystallization: 0 (blue), 24 (red),
5, 7, 9, 11, and 15h (top to bottom in gray). (C) Absorption
intensity at 530 nm over time (dots—measurements every 5 min).
(D) Schematic of the free-energy profile for the crystallization of 1.
Crystallization of 1
Crystallization of
compound 1 was induced by a direct addition of a THF
solution of 1 into water at 18 °C, resulting in
10–4 M water/THF = 85/15 (v/v) solution (Figure S1). The crystallization was monitored
using UV–vis and emission spectroscopies, Hyper-Rayleigh scattering
(HRS),[21] dynamic light scattering (DLS),
and electron microscopy. The UV–vis spectrum exhibits a gradual
broadening, red-shift, and decrease in intensity of PDI absorption
bands during crystallization (Figure B). Strongly broadened red-shifted PDI peaks are due
to formation of PDI crystals having extended π-stacks with strong
electronic coupling between PDI molecules.[22,23] The kinetics at the absorption maximum in UV–vis spectra
give rise to a sigmoidal curve typical of nucleation/growth processes
(Figure C). The lag
time is 5–6 h, followed by a growth period of about 9–12
h (Figure C). Similar
sigmoid kinetic traces are also observed by the emission, HRS, and
DLS spectroscopies, as well as by broadening of the UV–vis
absorption band (Figure S2). Precipitation
starts after 18 h (Figure S1), and most
material precipitates after 36 h.Structural development was
further studied using electron microscopy. Scanning electron microscopy
(SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) imaging of dried
samples of 1 reveal fast formation of spherical aggregates
(0–15 min of aging, Figures S3 and S4) having diameters of 51 ± 10 nm and no apparent order. Elongated
crystals, several to tens of micrometers long and hundreds of nanometers
in width, are observed after 18 h (Figures S5 and S6). Their crystallinity is evident from powder X-ray diffraction
(pXRD, Figure S7), electron diffraction
(ED, Figure S8), and the periodicity of
the lattice fringes observed in TEM images (Figure S6). At the end of the lag time (5–6 h of aging), mostly
spheres and a few crystals are observed (Figures S9 and S10). To elucidate the crystallization mechanism we
used cryogenic TEM (cryo-TEM) imaging to follow crystallization of 1.[24,25] Cryo-TEM revealed round aggregates
that formed within minutes of the initial mixing (Figure A and Figure S11), in good agreement with the SEM and TEM images of dried
samples (Figures S3 and S4). These spherical
aggregates had relatively smooth surfaces, and diameters of 60 ±
27 nm. Occasionally, truncated or dented spheres were also observed,
suggesting that the round structures are hollow and filled with solvent,
based on a lower contrast of interior (Figure A and Figure S11). Within 30 min to 1 h, cryo-TEM imaging revealed morphological
changes, manifested by apparent squeezing and deviations from the
originally smooth globular morphology (Figure B,C and Figure S12). The distorted spheres showed higher contrast compared to nonevolved
spheres, indicating densification. Cracks and ruptures in some of
the distorted spheres (exposing their hollow interior) coincided with
the observed change in morphology (Figure B, inset). At longer aging times, the distorted
densified spheres display initial crystalline order, as made evident
by the observation of lattice fringes, and faceting (Figure D and Figures S13–S16). With further aging, the evolving aggregates
exhibit a more pronounced faceting (at times adopting triangular or
rectangular shapes), also developing fiberlike crystalline whiskers
(Figure E and Figures S17–S19). They feature lattice
fringe periodicity of 1.6–1.9 and 1.2 nm (based on FFT, Figures S13–S19), comparable to the lattice
fringes (Figures S6 and S20) and the diffraction
peaks observed in the final crystals (1.8 and 1.1 nm, from the pXRD, Figure S7). Eventually, only elongated crystals
of various widths are observed in solution by cryo-TEM imaging after
24 h (Figure F and Figure S20). SEM imaging of the precipitate revealed
formation of faceted elongated crystals (10–30 μm long
and 100–700 nm width, Figure S5).
Figure 2
Cryo-TEM
images, crystallization of 1. (A) Spherical
aggregates formed immediately after sample preparation. (B) Aging
30–50 min, distorted densified spheres are observed (indicated
by red arrows). Inset: an example of aggregate densification, scale
bar is 50 nm.(C) A faceted intermediate with apparent crystallinity
(indicated by a black arrow). Red arrows denote distorted densified
spheres. (D) Ruptured aggregate exhibiting crystallinity (4.5 h of
aging). Inset: magnified view of the marked area, showing lattice
fringes. Scale bar is 20 nm. (E) Fibrous crystals growing from distorted
(faceted) spherical cores (5 h of aging). (F) Developed elongated
crystals (24 h of aging). Inset (magnified view of the marked area):
lattice fringes. Scale bar is 5 nm. Inset: FFT analysis showing periodicity
of 0.9 and 1.7 nm. Scale bar is 1 nm–1.
Cryo-TEM
images, crystallization of 1. (A) Spherical
aggregates formed immediately after sample preparation. (B) Aging
30–50 min, distorted densified spheres are observed (indicated
by red arrows). Inset: an example of aggregate densification, scale
bar is 50 nm.(C) A faceted intermediate with apparent crystallinity
(indicated by a black arrow). Red arrows denote distorted densified
spheres. (D) Ruptured aggregate exhibiting crystallinity (4.5 h of
aging). Inset: magnified view of the marked area, showing lattice
fringes. Scale bar is 20 nm. (E) Fibrous crystals growing from distorted
(faceted) spherical cores (5 h of aging). (F) Developed elongated
crystals (24 h of aging). Inset (magnified view of the marked area):
lattice fringes. Scale bar is 5 nm. Inset: FFT analysis showing periodicity
of 0.9 and 1.7 nm. Scale bar is 1 nm–1.Overall, the crystallization of 1 involves
several
key stages: (1) formation of amorphous spherical aggregates; (2) their
initial densification, leading to nucleation; (3) appearance of crystalline
order within the precursor that retains round morphology; and (4)
crystal growth occurring via continuous transition from crystalline
spheres to elongated faceted crystals. Few cases of fusion of unevolved
spherical aggregates with crystals were also detected (Figure S21). UV–vis spectroscopy shows
a continuous PDI absorption band broadening during the crystal growth
stage (following lag time of 5–6 h, Figure B and Figure S2C), indicating a gradual evolution of molecular ordering that leads
to stronger electronic coupling between the molecules of 1.[22,23] The beginning of the crystallization appears
to involve THF desolvation from the aggregates, since high THF content
was found to stabilize the amorphous spheres. At higher THF content
the spheres, that initially form, are more stable: In water/THF =
7/3 (v/v, 10–4 M) solutions, the spherical aggregates
are stable for days (Figure S22), and only
small amounts of crystalline products are observed. In water/THF =
1/1 (v/v, 10–4 M) the spheres are stable for months
(Figure S23). The THF content also affects
the supersaturation level; when the THF content is higher, the effective
concentration is lower. In the crystallization of 1,
the immediate formation of the spherical aggregates suggests high
supersaturation that promotes efficient phase separation. We note
that the nature of the initially formed phase and its role in crystallization
represent a key question in nonclassical crystallization.[3,26] In the case of 1, the initial amorphous phase (the
spheres) is relatively stable, resulting in slow nucleation as made
evident by kinetic and cryo-TEM studies, consistent with the two-step
nucleation theory.[1] The high barrier (Figure D) implies the need
for a considerable reorganization within the spheres to form a nucleus.
The densification (shrinking) of the spheres suggests that nucleation
takes place in the inner denser parts of the aggregates; however,
the precise location of the more ordered regions was not possible
to observe directly.
Crystallization of 2
In the case of compound 2 (Figure A), crystallization involves precursors very
different from those
observed for 1. To achieve conditions optimal for the
cryo-TEM and spectroscopic studies, a high THF content was required
to prevent fast precipitation of 2. Crystallization was
induced by a direct addition of water into the THF solution of 2 at 18 °C, yielding the desired water/THF content (1/1
or 7/3, v/v) and concentration. At high THF content (water/THF = 1/1,
v/v) and with 2 in a concentration of 10–4 M, some of the material precipitated within several days as crystalline
red needles, while most of it remained in solution (Figure S24A), where it is molecularly dissolved (Figure S25), indicating low supersaturation.
The crystal structure of the needles was determined by single crystal
synchrotron X-ray diffraction and was found to fit a previously published
crystal structure of 2 (monoclinic P21/c unit cell),[27] featuring π-stacked PDI columns along the crystalline b axis (Figures S26 and S27).Cryo-TEM imaging at various aging times revealed several distinct
morphologies in THF/water = 1/1 (v/v) solution of 2 at
10–4 M concentration. An early diffuse amorphous
phase was detected both in a nascent form (Figure B) and in a more developed form—in
contact with partially developed elongated structures (Figure C). The amorphous phase appeared to contain a significant
amount of solvent as revealed by its relatively light contrast and
disjointed morphology. The elongated structures formed in contact
with the amorphous phase (Figure C) lack any apparent order as made evident by FFT analysis,
but are denser than the surrounding phase as indicated by its darker
contrast. A more evolved phase, underdeveloped needles (Figure D–H and Figures S29 and S30), was also observed. These
lack the sharp faceting characteristic of the final products and are
embedded within the diffuse amorphous phase, yet they show regions
of periodic lattice fringes of 1.6 nm fitting the (200) spacing of
16.3 Å (Figures S27 and S30). These
underdeveloped needles also exhibit poorly aligned fibrous features
2.4 ± 0.7 nm wide (Figure F,H, and Figure S29), reflecting
an intermediate stage in crystal evolution. The crystallization intermediates
in Figure D–H
and Figures S29 and S30 exhibited an increase
in the density gradient from the outer to the inner part. More evolved
structures represent a later stage of crystallization, exhibiting
various levels of order (Figure ). They feature domains having lattice fringes
of 1.7 and 0.9 nm, yet the latter are somewhat misaligned, while the
domains are oriented in different directions. Amorphous regions were
also observed (Figure B). Overall, the evolving needles reveal the broad spectrum of the
ordering, indicating the gradual development of crystallinity. The
fully evolved crystalline needles showed faceted surfaces and lattice
spacings of 1.7 and 0.9 nm (Figures S31 and S32) that correspond to the {200} and {002} planes of the crystal (Figure S27). During crystallization, the amorphous
diffuse phase (Figure B,G and Figure S28) represents the prenucleation
(dense liquid) state and has no apparent order. It subsequently densifies
(Figure C) and gradually
develops crystalline order (Figures D–H and 4).
Figure 4
Cryo-TEM images of 2 in water/THF (1/1 v/v) solution,
10–4 M. (A) Partly developed needle. (B) Magnified
view of the marked area in part A showing misaligned and partly parallel
patches of ordered domains. (C) Magnified view of the marked area
in part B. Inset: FFT analysis of part C showing periodicities of
1.7 and 0.9 nm with wide angular spread, demonstrating misalignment
of lattice fringe patches. Scale bar is 2 nm–1.
Cryo-TEM images,
crystallization of 2. (A) Molecular
structure of compound 2 and its UV–vis spectra
in water/THF = 7/3 (v/v) mixture, 10–5 M, immediately
after preparation (blue), and after 3 h (red). (B–H) Cryo-TEM
images of 2 in water/THF = 1/1 (v/v) mixture, 10–4 M. (B) Unstructured amorphous liquidlike aggregate
(30 min of aging). (C) Dense elongated structure forming within the
amorphous aggregate (30 min of aging). (D–H) Early order evolution
stages (30 min of aging). (D) Underformed needle shrouded in remains
of an amorphous aggregate. (E, F) Magnified views of the areas marked
in parts D and E, respectively. (F) Fibrous features within the underformed
needle are indicated by red arrows. (G) Underformed needle shrouded
in an amorphous phase. An amorphous aggregate is indicated by a red
arrow. (H) Magnified view of the area marked in G showing fibrous
features composing the evolving crystal. (I) 2 in water/THF
= 7/3 (v/v) mixture, 10–5 M, showing an underformed
needle shrouded in amorphous phase (30 min of aging). Top inset: magnified
view of the marked area. Scale bar is 30 nm. Bottom inset: FFT analysis
of the marked area showing lattice fringes periodicity of 1.1 and
1.6 nm. Scale bar is 1 nm–1.Cryo-TEM images of 2 in water/THF (1/1 v/v) solution,
10–4 M. (A) Partly developed needle. (B) Magnified
view of the marked area in part A showing misaligned and partly parallel
patches of ordered domains. (C) Magnified view of the marked area
in part B. Inset: FFT analysis of part C showing periodicities of
1.7 and 0.9 nm with wide angular spread, demonstrating misalignment
of lattice fringe patches. Scale bar is 2 nm–1.At lower THF content, water/THF
= 7/3 (v/v) and 2 in
concentration of 10–5 M, most of the material precipitated
as red needles within 72 h (Figures S24B,C and S33). It exhibited the same structure as that of the crystals
observed in the case of water/THF = 1/1 (v/v, Figure S27). The UV–vis spectrum of the freshly prepared
water/THF = 7/3 (v/v, 10–5 M) solution of 2 exhibited a broad peak with a 0–0 and 0–1
band pattern typical of π-stacked PDIs (Figure A, blue trace). Within 3 h, the spectrum
gradually developed a broad absorption band (Figure A, red trace) typical of PDI crystals.[22,23] Cryo-TEM of the solution after aging time of 20–30 min revealed
underformed needles lacking distinct facets and shrouded within an
amorphous phase (Figure I and Figure S34). These needles showed
regions having observable lattice fringes (Figure I and Figure S34), and exhibited an increased density gradient from the outer to
the inner part, where order appears to be more pronounced in the inner
part (Figure I and Figure S34). These observations imply that the
nucleation takes place at the interior part of the phase, and order
is developing outward. Fully developed faceted crystals were observed
after 3 h of aging (Figure S35). Thus,
in water/THF = 7/3 (v/v, 10–5 M) the crystallization
of 2 involves gradual order evolution and apparent densification
as indicated by UV–vis and cryo-TEM, similarly to the water/THF
= 1/1 (v/v, 1 × 10–4 M) system. The crystallization
of 2 reveals a mechanistic resemblance to that of 1, following the same key stages and the same type of energetic
path (Figure D), yet
there are also apparent differences resulting from variations in molecular
structures and crystallization conditions. Compound 2 exhibits both a higher symmetry and hydrophobicity compared to 1. Hence, 2 displays a more efficient ordering,
bringing the system closer to the final structure. On the other hand,
higher THF content in the case of crystallization of 2 results in a more liquidlike, dynamic nature of the initial aggregates,
while in the case of 1 the prenucleation aggregates are
more “solidlike”, less dynamic, and less ordered.
Crystallization Mechanism
Crystallization paths of 1 and 2 are schematically represented in Figure . Although these
two processes commence from aggregates that are very different in
terms of density and morphology, they exhibit a common general mechanism.
It involves three main stages: (1) initial densification; (2) early
ordering; and (3) concurrent evolution of order and morphology (Figure ). The initial densification
of the solvent-rich precursors is a critical step, analogously to
nonclassical inorganic crystallization.[28] Furthermore, crystalline order evolves continuously from the amorphous
precursors via partial early ordering followed by order optimization
and concurrent morphology change. This mechanistic picture differs
significantly from classical crystallization mechanisms, where the
initial crystal nucleus is postulated to exhibit the same crystalline
structure and density as the final crystal.[29] Our findings support two-step nucleation theory that implies initial
densification of a solvent-rich precursor phase.[1] Furthermore, we elucidate the intrinsic connection between
density, molecular ordering, and morphology that evolve gradually.
Figure 5
Schematic
representation of crystallization pathways of compounds 1 (top) and 2 (bottom). Three main stages of
continuous order development are depicted: initial densification,
early ordering, and evolution of molecular order (crystal packing)
and morphology.
Schematic
representation of crystallization pathways of compounds 1 (top) and 2 (bottom). Three main stages of
continuous order development are depicted: initial densification,
early ordering, and evolution of molecular order (crystal packing)
and morphology.
Conclusions
Nonclassical
crystallization of simple aromatic compounds has been
studied with high temporal and structural resolution. We show that
dissimilar amorphous precursors exist. They transform into crystals
via simultaneous and gradual evolution of density, molecular packing,
and morphology. These findings provide direct experimental evidence
that corroborates the two-step nucleation theory, and further elucidates
continuous evolution of crystallinity, in which the final crystalline
order gradually develops rather than forms at the nucleation stage.
This is of fundamental importance for nonclassical crystallization
paradigm, and has not been previously observed in organic systems.
Overall, the observed mechanism advances a unifying view of nonclassical
organic crystallization, having implications for rational design of
organic crystalline materials.
Authors: Heiner Friedrich; Peter M Frederik; Gijsbertus de With; Nico A J M Sommerdijk Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2010-10-18 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: James J De Yoreo; Pupa U P A Gilbert; Nico A J M Sommerdijk; R Lee Penn; Stephen Whitelam; Derk Joester; Hengzhong Zhang; Jeffrey D Rimer; Alexandra Navrotsky; Jillian F Banfield; Adam F Wallace; F Marc Michel; Fiona C Meldrum; Helmut Cölfen; Patricia M Dove Journal: Science Date: 2015-07-31 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Andrea Sauter; Felix Roosen-Runge; Fajun Zhang; Gudrun Lotze; Robert M J Jacobs; Frank Schreiber Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2015-01-23 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Tomoya Yamazaki; Yuki Kimura; Peter G Vekilov; Erika Furukawa; Manabu Shirai; Hiroaki Matsumoto; Alexander E S Van Driessche; Katsuo Tsukamoto Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2017-02-13 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Jesús Del Barrio; Ji Liu; Ryan A Brady; Cindy S Y Tan; Stefano Chiodini; Maria Ricci; Rafael Fernández-Leiro; Ching-Ju Tsai; Panagiota Vasileiadi; Lorenzo Di Michele; Didier Lairez; Chris Toprakcioglu; Oren A Scherman Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2019-08-28 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Oscar Urquidi; Johanna Brazard; Natalie LeMessurier; Lena Simine; Takuji B M Adachi Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2022-04-08 Impact factor: 12.779