Literature DB >> 19160366

Randomized clinical trial of a modified Seldinger technique for open central venous cannulation for implantable access devices.

P Knebel1, L Fischer, J Huesing, R Hennes, M W Büchler, C M Seiler.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Totally implantable access ports (TIAPs) are often used for patients who need permanent venous access. The primary success rate using direct open insertion is about 80 per cent, so rescue strategies are needed. This study compared the primary success rates of standard open insertion and a modified Seldinger technique.
METHODS: This randomized trial recruited 164 patients scheduled for primary implantation of a TIAP and compared two interventions. The primary endpoint was the success rate of the implantation technique.
RESULTS: The primary success rates were similar: 66 (80 per cent) of 82 patients who had standard open insertion versus 69 (84 per cent) of 82 patients undergoing the modified Seldinger method (P = 0.686). A logistic mixed regression analysis including treatment group, age, Karnofsky index, body mass index and surgeon's experience showed no advantage for the Seldinger method: odds ratio 1.30 (95 per cent confidence interval 0.62 to 2.70). TIAPs were eventually implanted successfully in 163 (99.4 per cent) of 164 patients. In 11 patients randomized to standard surgery, the Seldinger method was a successful rescue strategy.
CONCLUSION: The primary success rate was similar for both open insertion methods. The modified Seldinger method is useful if standard open insertion fails. REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN 52368201 (http://www.controlled-trials.com).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19160366     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.6457

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  12 in total

Review 1.  Totally implantable vascular access devices 30 years after the first procedure. What has changed and what is still unsolved?

Authors:  Roberto Biffi; Adriana Toro; Simonetta Pozzi; Isidoro Di Carlo
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Catheter-related Complications of Subcutaneous Implantable Venous Access Devices in Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Ahmed El-Balat; Iryna Schmeil; Thomas Karn; Uwe Holtrich; Loreta Mavrova-Risteska; Achim Rody; Aly Youssef; Lars C Hanker
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2018 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 3.  Venous cutdown versus the Seldinger technique for placement of totally implantable venous access ports.

Authors:  Charlie C-T Hsu; Gigi N C Kwan; Hannah Evans-Barns; John A Rophael; Mieke L van Driel
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-08-21

4.  Meta-analysis of primary open versus closed cannulation strategy for totally implantable venous access port implantation.

Authors:  Ulla Klaiber; Pascal Probst; Matthes Hackbusch; Katrin Jensen; Colette Dörr-Harim; Felix J Hüttner; Thilo Hackert; Markus K Diener; Markus W Büchler; Phillip Knebel
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 5.  Comparison of ultrasound-guided modified Seldinger technique versus blind puncture for peripherally inserted central catheter: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  ZhanZhan Li; LiZhang Chen
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 9.097

6.  Frequency of pneumothorax and haemothorax after primary open versus closed implantation strategies for insertion of a totally implantable venous access port in oncological patients: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Felix J Hüttner; Tom Bruckner; Ingo Alldinger; Roland Hennes; Alexis Ulrich; Markus W Büchler; Markus K Diener; Phillip Knebel
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 7.  Randomized controlled trials in central vascular access devices: A scoping review.

Authors:  Mari Takashima; Gillian Ray-Barruel; Amanda Ullman; Samantha Keogh; Claire M Rickard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Arm port vs chest port: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Guanhua Li; Yu Zhang; Hongmin Ma; Junmeng Zheng
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 3.989

9.  A Five-Year Data Report of Long-Term Central Venous Catheters Focusing on Early Complications.

Authors:  Harald Lenz; Kirsti Myre; Tomas Draegni; Elizabeth Dorph
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2019-12-10

10.  1000 Port-A-Cath ® placements by subclavian vein approach: single surgeon experience.

Authors:  S Mudan; A Giakoustidis; D Morrison; S Iosifidou; R Raobaikady; K Neofytou; J Stebbing
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.