Frank T Materia1, Joshua M Smyth1,2, Kristin E Heron3, Marianne Hillemeier4, Mark E Feinberg5, Patricia Fonzi6, Danielle Symons Downs7,8. 1. Department of Biobehavioral Health, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA. 2. Department of Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, USA. 3. Department of Psychology, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA 23529, USA. 4. Department of Health Policy and Administration, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA. 5. Prevention Research Center, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA. 6. Family Health Council of Central Pennsylvania, Camp Hill, PA 17011, USA. 7. Department of Kinesiology, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA. 8. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of maternal perinatal obesity is rising, and in turn, increases health risks and morbidity for both mother and child. Past evidence suggests the preconceptional Strong Healthy Women (SHW) intervention can reduce multiple biobehavioral risk factors for adverse perinatal health. The SHW intervention, however, was time- and resource-intensive to deliver. Mobile health (mHealth) technologies provide an opportunity to expand intervention reach while reducing implementation cost and burden. Previous research suggests that preconceptional women are broadly supportive of using smartphones for behavior change, yet few studies have elicited their specific preferences for a targeted mHealth intervention. The objective of this study was to evaluate women's preferences for receiving SHW content via smartphone to supplement the design of SMART SHW, a redeveloped version of the intervention that utilizes smartphones to enhance delivery. METHODS: Overweight/obese (mean BMI =31.4) preconceptional community women (N=40) participated in semi-structured focus group interviews. SHW components across four content areas (physical activity, nutrition, stress, weight management) were presented to participants; women provided preferences for program elements viewed as acceptable to convert to smartphone. Thematic analysis was used to analyze interview data. After the interviews were completed, an iterative review of the data to determine which aspects of SHW were feasible to modify for mobile delivery was conducted. RESULTS: Women preferred to receive SHW communications, surveys, and educational materials on their smartphones via texting, mobile websites, and a SMART SHW app; MyFitnessPal and a wearable pedometer were preferred methods for tracking nutrition and activity. Salient mHealth design themes included providing pop-ups as reminders, using web-based videos to supplement the curriculum, and presenting on-screen information in a concise format. In designing the final prototype, 87% of participant preferences were able to be incorporated. CONCLUSIONS: Smartphone devices can enhance the reach of face-to-face behavioral interventions by reducing implementation burden. Engaging end-users (in this case, preconceptional women with overweight/obesity) in the mHealth design process through semi-structured focus groups is a feasible and useful approach. Eliciting and leveraging user preferences guides the development of an intervention framework that is highly acceptable to the target participants.
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of maternal perinatal obesity is rising, and in turn, increases health risks and morbidity for both mother and child. Past evidence suggests the preconceptional Strong Healthy Women (SHW) intervention can reduce multiple biobehavioral risk factors for adverse perinatal health. The SHW intervention, however, was time- and resource-intensive to deliver. Mobile health (mHealth) technologies provide an opportunity to expand intervention reach while reducing implementation cost and burden. Previous research suggests that preconceptional women are broadly supportive of using smartphones for behavior change, yet few studies have elicited their specific preferences for a targeted mHealth intervention. The objective of this study was to evaluate women's preferences for receiving SHW content via smartphone to supplement the design of SMART SHW, a redeveloped version of the intervention that utilizes smartphones to enhance delivery. METHODS: Overweight/obese (mean BMI =31.4) preconceptional community women (N=40) participated in semi-structured focus group interviews. SHW components across four content areas (physical activity, nutrition, stress, weight management) were presented to participants; women provided preferences for program elements viewed as acceptable to convert to smartphone. Thematic analysis was used to analyze interview data. After the interviews were completed, an iterative review of the data to determine which aspects of SHW were feasible to modify for mobile delivery was conducted. RESULTS: Women preferred to receive SHW communications, surveys, and educational materials on their smartphones via texting, mobile websites, and a SMART SHW app; MyFitnessPal and a wearable pedometer were preferred methods for tracking nutrition and activity. Salient mHealth design themes included providing pop-ups as reminders, using web-based videos to supplement the curriculum, and presenting on-screen information in a concise format. In designing the final prototype, 87% of participant preferences were able to be incorporated. CONCLUSIONS: Smartphone devices can enhance the reach of face-to-face behavioral interventions by reducing implementation burden. Engaging end-users (in this case, preconceptional women with overweight/obesity) in the mHealth design process through semi-structured focus groups is a feasible and useful approach. Eliciting and leveraging user preferences guides the development of an intervention framework that is highly acceptable to the target participants.
Entities:
Keywords:
Preconception; mobile health (mHealth); obesity; pregnancy; smartphone
Authors: Deborah Rohm Young; Carolyn C Johnson; Allan Steckler; Joel Gittelsohn; Ruth P Saunders; Brit I Saksvig; Kurt M Ribisl; Leslie A Lytle; Thomas L McKenzie Journal: Health Educ Behav Date: 2006-02
Authors: Sevilay Temel; Sabine F van Voorst; Brian W Jack; Semiha Denktaş; Eric A P Steegers Journal: Epidemiol Rev Date: 2013-08-28 Impact factor: 6.222
Authors: Carol S Weisman; Marianne M Hillemeier; Danielle Symons Downs; Mark E Feinberg; Cynthia H Chuang; John J Botti; Anne-Marie Dyer Journal: Womens Health Issues Date: 2011-05-04
Authors: Kay Johnson; Samuel F Posner; Janis Biermann; José F Cordero; Hani K Atrash; Christopher S Parker; Sheree Boulet; Michele G Curtis Journal: MMWR Recomm Rep Date: 2006-04-21
Authors: Danielle Symons Downs; Mark Feinberg; Marianne M Hillemeier; Carol S Weisman; Gary A Chase; Cynthia H Chuang; Roxanne Parrott; Lori A Francis Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2008-02-13
Authors: Matthijs R Van Dijk; Nicole A Huijgen; Sten P Willemsen; Joop Se Laven; Eric Ap Steegers; Régine Pm Steegers-Theunissen Journal: JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Date: 2016-05-27 Impact factor: 4.773
Authors: Matthijs R van Dijk; Elsje C Oostingh; Maria P H Koster; Sten P Willemsen; Joop S E Laven; Régine P M Steegers-Theunissen Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2017-01-26 Impact factor: 3.007