PURPOSE: To investigate the long-term (6- and 12-month) effects of the Strong Healthy Women intervention on health-related behaviors, weight and body mass index (BMI), and weight gain during pregnancy. Strong Healthy Women is a small-group behavioral intervention for pre- and interconceptional women designed to modify key risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes; pretest-posttest findings from a randomized, controlled trial have been previously reported. The following questions are addressed: 1) were significant pretest-posttest changes in health-related behaviors (previously reported) maintained over the 12-month follow-up period; 2) did the intervention impact weight and BMI over the 12-month follow-up period; and 3) did the intervention impact pregnancy weight gain for those who gave birth during the follow-up period? METHODS: Data are from 6- and 12-month follow-up telephone interviews of women in the original trial of the Strong Healthy Women intervention (n = 362) and from birth records for singleton births (n = 45) during the 12-month follow-up period. Repeated measures regression was used to evaluate intervention effects. MAIN FINDINGS: At the 12-month follow-up, participants in the Strong Healthy Women intervention were significantly more likely than controls to use a daily multivitamin with folic acid and to have lower weight and BMI. The intervention's effect on reading food labels for nutritional values dropped off between the 6- and 12-month follow-up. Among those who gave birth to singletons during the follow-up period, women who participated in the intervention had lower average pregnancy weight gain compared with controls. Although the intervention effect was no longer significant when controlling for pre-pregnancy obesity, the adjusted means show a trend toward lower weight gain in the intervention group. CONCLUSION: These findings provide important evidence that the Strong Healthy Women behavior change intervention is effective in modifying important risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes and may improve an important pregnancy outcome, weight gain during pregnancy. Because the intervention seems to help women manage their weight in the months after the intervention and during pregnancy, it may be an effective obesity prevention strategy for women before, during, and after the transition to motherhood.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To investigate the long-term (6- and 12-month) effects of the Strong Healthy Women intervention on health-related behaviors, weight and body mass index (BMI), and weight gain during pregnancy. Strong Healthy Women is a small-group behavioral intervention for pre- and interconceptional women designed to modify key risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes; pretest-posttest findings from a randomized, controlled trial have been previously reported. The following questions are addressed: 1) were significant pretest-posttest changes in health-related behaviors (previously reported) maintained over the 12-month follow-up period; 2) did the intervention impact weight and BMI over the 12-month follow-up period; and 3) did the intervention impact pregnancy weight gain for those who gave birth during the follow-up period? METHODS: Data are from 6- and 12-month follow-up telephone interviews of women in the original trial of the Strong Healthy Women intervention (n = 362) and from birth records for singleton births (n = 45) during the 12-month follow-up period. Repeated measures regression was used to evaluate intervention effects. MAIN FINDINGS: At the 12-month follow-up, participants in the Strong Healthy Women intervention were significantly more likely than controls to use a daily multivitamin with folic acid and to have lower weight and BMI. The intervention's effect on reading food labels for nutritional values dropped off between the 6- and 12-month follow-up. Among those who gave birth to singletons during the follow-up period, women who participated in the intervention had lower average pregnancy weight gain compared with controls. Although the intervention effect was no longer significant when controlling for pre-pregnancy obesity, the adjusted means show a trend toward lower weight gain in the intervention group. CONCLUSION: These findings provide important evidence that the Strong Healthy Women behavior change intervention is effective in modifying important risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes and may improve an important pregnancy outcome, weight gain during pregnancy. Because the intervention seems to help women manage their weight in the months after the intervention and during pregnancy, it may be an effective obesity prevention strategy for women before, during, and after the transition to motherhood.
Authors: Carol S Weisman; Marianne M Hillemeier; Gary A Chase; Anne-Marie Dyer; Sara A Baker; Mark Feinberg; Danielle Symons Downs; Roxanne L Parrott; Heather K Cecil; John J Botti; Colin MacNeill; Cynthia H Chuang; Berwood Yost Journal: Womens Health Issues Date: 2006 Jul-Aug
Authors: Carol S Weisman; Marianne M Hillemeier; Danielle Symons Downs; Cynthia H Chuang; Anne-Marie Dyer Journal: Womens Health Issues Date: 2010-02-04
Authors: Kay Johnson; Samuel F Posner; Janis Biermann; José F Cordero; Hani K Atrash; Christopher S Parker; Sheree Boulet; Michele G Curtis Journal: MMWR Recomm Rep Date: 2006-04-21
Authors: Marianne M Hillemeier; Danielle Symons Downs; Mark E Feinberg; Carol S Weisman; Cynthia H Chuang; Roxanne Parrott; Diana Velott; Lori A Francis; Sara A Baker; Anne-Marie Dyer; Vernon M Chinchilli Journal: Womens Health Issues Date: 2008 Nov-Dec
Authors: Danielle Symons Downs; Mark Feinberg; Marianne M Hillemeier; Carol S Weisman; Gary A Chase; Cynthia H Chuang; Roxanne Parrott; Lori A Francis Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2008-02-13
Authors: Carol S Weisman; Dawn P Misra; Marianne M Hillemeier; Danielle Symons Downs; Cynthia H Chuang; Fabian T Camacho; Anne-Marie Dyer Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2009-05-27
Authors: Janet L Engstrom; Susan A Paterson; Anastasia Doherty; Mary Trabulsi; Kara L Speer Journal: J Midwifery Womens Health Date: 2003 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.388
Authors: Bernard F Fuemmeler; Pamela Behrman; Maija Taylor; Rebeccah Sokol; Emily Rothman; Lisette T Jacobson; Danielle Wischenka; Kenneth P Tercyak Journal: J Behav Med Date: 2016-09-09
Authors: Harpreet S Chahal; Bizu Gelaye; Elizabeth Mostofsky; Sixto E Sanchez; Juan F Mere; Francisco G Mercado; Percy Pacora; Michelle A Williams Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2019-07 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: James Kent; William C Dodson; Allen Kunselman; Jaimey Pauli; Alicia Stone; Michael P Diamond; Christos Coutifaris; William D Schlaff; Ruben Alvero; Peter Casson; Gregory M Christman; R Mitchell Rosen; Karl R Hansen; Randall D Robinson; Valerie Baker; Rebecca Usadi; Nanette Santoro; Heping Zhang; Esther Eisenberg; Richard S Legro Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2018-11-01 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Mario P DeMarco; Maha Shafqat; Michael A Horst; Sukanya Srinivasan; Daniel J Frayne; Lisa Schlar; Wendy Brooks Barr Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2020-11-27
Authors: Frank T Materia; Joshua M Smyth; Kristin E Heron; Marianne Hillemeier; Mark E Feinberg; Patricia Fonzi; Danielle Symons Downs Journal: Mhealth Date: 2018-07-06