| Literature DB >> 30147731 |
Xueyu Zhao1,2,3,4, Xiaojun Dai1,2,3,4,5, Shanshan Wang5, Ting Yang1,2,3,4, Yan Yan1,2,3,4, Guang Zhu1,2,3,4, Jun Feng1,2,3,4, Bo Pan1,2,3,4, Masataka Sunagawa6, Xiaochun Zhang5, Yayun Qian1,2,3,4, Yanqing Liu1,2,3,4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of combined traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) and conventional chemotherapy versus conventional chemotherapy in patients with stage II-IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after radical surgery.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30147731 PMCID: PMC6083736 DOI: 10.1155/2018/4369027
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
The most commonly used herbs per traditional Chinese medicine syndrome.
| Chinese Name (Pinyin) | Pharmaceutical Name | English Name | Dosage (g) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Syndrome of Deficiency of pulmonary Qi(LiuJunZi decoction) | |||
| Huangqi | Radix Astragali seu Hedysari | Membranous milkvetch root/ | 40 |
| Dangshen | Radix Codonopsis | Pilose Asiabell Root /Moderate Asiabell Root/Szechwon Tangshen Root | 15 |
| Baizhu | Rhizoma Atractylodis Macrocephalae | Largehead atractylodes rhizome | 10 |
| Fuling | Poria | Indian buead | 15 |
| Chenpi | Pericarpium Citri Reticulatae | Tangerine Peel | 6 |
| Xingren | Semen Armeniacae Amarum | Bitter apricot seed | 9 |
| Syndrome of Deficiency of Qi and Yin(ShaShenMaiDong decoction) | |||
| Huangqi | Radix Astragali seu Hedysari | Membranous milkvetch root/ | 40 |
| Beishashen | Radix Glehniae | Coastal glehnia root | 15 |
| Maidong | Radix Ophiopogonis | Dwarf, lilyturf tuber, ophiopogon | 15 |
| Tiandong | Radix Asparagi | Cochinchinese asparagus root | 15 |
| Baihe | Bulbus Lilii | Lancelesf Lily Bulb / Greenish Lily Bulb | 15 |
| Beimu | Bulbus Fritillariae Unibracteatae | Unibract Fritillary Bulb | 15 |
| Syndrome of Stagnation of phlegm and blood stasis(SiWu decoction together with HuaTan decoction) | |||
| Danggui | Radix Angelicae Sinensis | Chinese Angelica | 15 |
| Shudi | Radix Rehmanniae | Rehmannia Root | 15 |
| Chishao | Radix Paeoniae Rubra | Red Paeony Root | 10 |
| Chuanxiong | Rhizoma Chuanxiong | Szechuan Lovage Rhizome | 10 |
| Yiyiren | Semen Coicis | Coix Seed | 20 |
| Chenpi | Pericarpium Citri Reticulatae | Tangerine Peel | 6 |
| Banxia | Rhizoma Pinelliae | Pinellia Tuber | 10 |
| Ban Zhi Lian | Herba Scutellariae Barbatae | Barbed Skullcap Herb | 15 |
| Baihuasheshecao | Herba Hedyotidis Diffusae | Spreading Hedyotis Herb | 15 |
Patient base-line characteristics.
| Characteristic | TCM user group(N=32) | non-TCM user group(N=35) | p |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex, (%) | |||
| Male | 21 (65.62) | 26(74.29) | |
| Female | 11(34.38) | 9(25.71) | 0.439 |
| Age, yr, (%) | |||
| ≤50 | 5(15.63) | 5(14.29) | |
| 50-65 | 20(62.50) | 20(57.14) | |
| >65 | 7(21.87) | 10(28.57) | 0.820 |
| Smoking status, (%) | |||
| Never smoked | 12(37.50) | 12(34.29) | |
| <400 | 14(43.75) | 12(34.29) | |
| ≥400 | 6(18.75) | 11(31.42) | 0.474 |
| ECOG performance status score—no. (%) | |||
| 0 | 0 | 2(5.71) | |
| 1 | 27(84.38) | 27(77.14) | |
| 2 | 5(15.62) | 6(17.14) | 0.375 |
| Tumor size, (%) | |||
| <5cm | 14(43.75) | 17(48.57) | |
| ≥5cm | 18(56.25) | 18(51.43) | 0.693 |
| Histologic diagnosis, (%) | |||
| Adenocarcinoma | 23(71.88) | 21(60.0) | |
| Squamous-cell carcinoma | 9(28.12) | 12(34.28) | |
| Adenosquamous carcinoma | 0 | 1(2.86) | |
| Other | 0 | 1(2.86) | 0.496 |
| Clinical stage, (%) | |||
| IIA | 6(18.75) | 13(37.14) | |
| IIB | 14(43.75) | 9(25.71) | |
| IIIA | 12(37.50) | 13(37.14) | 0.167 |
| modus operandi, (%) | |||
| thoracotomy | 17(53.13) | 18(51.43) | |
| Thoracoscopy minimally invasive | 14(43.75) | 15(42.86) | |
| Combined | 1(3.12) | 2(5.71) | 0.877 |
Figure 1Comparison of DFS of patients according to different treatment.
Predictors of DFS in NSCLC patients.
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Age group (≤50 /50-65/≥65 years old) | 0.505 | 0.292-0.871 | 0.014 | 0.272 | 0.141-0.525 | 0.000 |
| ECOG (=0/1/2) | 1.936 | 0.877-4.276 | 0.102 | 5.161 | 1.932-13.791 | 0.001 |
| lymphatic metastasis(≥5/<5) | 0.043 | 0.-4536.482 | 0.595 | 4.101 | 1.531-10.989 | 0.005 |
| BMI(<20/20-24/>24) | 0.351 | 0.145-0.851 | 0.021 | 0.259 | 0.91-0.734 | 0.011 |
| Occupation (peasant/ worker/ cadre/ intellectual) | 1.483 | 0.549-4.005 | 0.437 | 4.426 | 1.274-15.381 | 0.019 |
| KPS (<80/≥80) | 0.471 | 0.235-0.943 | 0.034 | |||
| Smoke (no/yes) | 1.260 | 0.811-1.957 | 0.303 | |||
| Tumor size (≥5/<5) | 1.115 | 0.570-2.180 | 0.750 | |||
| Clinical stages (IIA /IIB/IIIA) | 1.139 | 0.748-1.735 | 0.543 | |||
| Treatment (TCM user/non-TCM user) | 0.409 | 0.200-0.837 | 0.014 | |||
Figure 2Comparison of DFS of patients with 0-1 prognostic risk factors according to treatment.
Figure 3Comparison of DFS of patients with ≥2 prognostic risk factors according to treatment.