| Literature DB >> 32140080 |
Qin Wang1, Lijing Jiao1,2, Shengfei Wang3, Peiqi Chen1, Ling Bi1, Di Zhou1, Jialin Yao1, Jiaqi Li1, Liyu Wang1, Zhiwei Chen4, Yingjie Jia5, Ziwen Zhang6, Weisheng Shen7, Weirong Zhu8, Jianfang Xu9, Yong Gao10, Ling Xu1, Yabin Gong1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The toxicity and side effects caused by adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) after radical surgery for lung adenocarcinoma (LAC) lead to early termination frequently. This study was conducted to provide an objective basis for the effect of Chinese herbal medicine formulas (CHMFs) combined with chemotherapy in reducing toxicity and enhancing efficacy of ACT.Entities:
Keywords: Adjuvant chemotherapy; Adverse events; Chinese herbal medicine formulas; Disease-free survival; Lung adenocarcinoma
Year: 2020 PMID: 32140080 PMCID: PMC7049384 DOI: 10.1186/s12575-020-00117-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biol Proced Online ISSN: 1480-9222 Impact factor: 3.244
Composition of the basic herbs and added formulas with different syndromes
| Xia Ku Cao | Spica Prunellae | Dry spikes | 15 | ||
| Sheng Nan Xing | Arisaema Rhizoma Arisaematis | Dry rhizoma | 30 | ||
| She Liu Gu | Rhizoma Amorphophalli | Dry tubers | 30 | ||
| Shan Ci Gu | Pseudobulbus Cremastrae Seu Pleiones | Dry pseudobulb | 15 | ||
| Ze Qi | Euphorbiae Helioscopiae | Herba | 15 | ||
| Shi Shang Bai | Selaginella Doederleinii | Herba | 30 | ||
| Shi Jian Chuan | Salviae Chinensis | Herba | 30 | ||
| Chong Lou | Rhizoma Paridis | Dry rhizoma | 15 | ||
| Hai Zao | Seaweed | Leaves | 15 | ||
| Gua Lou Pi | Pericarpium Trichosanthis | Pericarp | 15 | ||
| Mao Zhua Cao | Radix Ranunculus Ternati | Herba | 15 | ||
| Sheng Mu Li | Oyster Shell | Shell | 30 | ||
| Da Zao | Fructus Jujubae | Fruit | 9 | ||
| Huang Qi | Milkvetch Root Radix Astragali | Dry rhizoma | 30 | ||
| Dang Shen | Codonopsis Radix | Dry rhizoma | 9 | ||
| Bai Zhu | Atractylodis Macrocephalae Rhizoma | Dry rhizoma | 12 | ||
| Fu Ling | Indian Bread Poria | Dry rhizoma | 15 | ||
| Yin Yang Huo | Epimedii Folium | Herba | 15 | ||
| Hu Lu Ba | Common Fenugreek Seed Semen Trigonellae | Dry seed | 15 | ||
| Bu Gu Zhi | Fructus Psoraleae | Fruit | 12 | ||
| Bei Sha Shen | Coastal Glehnia Root | Dry rhizoma | 30 | ||
| Nan Sha Shen | Fourleaf Ladybell Root | Dry rhizoma | 30 | ||
| Tian Dong | Cochinchinese Asparagus Root | Dry rhizoma | 15 | ||
| Mai Dong | Dwarf Lilyturf Tuber | Dry rhizoma | 15 | ||
| Bai He | Lilii Bulbus | Scale leaf | 15 | ||
| Nv Zhen Zi | Fructus Ligustri Lucidi | Fruit | 12 | ||
Fig. 1Study profile. Data cutoff was April 16, 2018. CHMF, Chinese herbal medicine formula
Baseline characteristics and demographics of the population received adjuvant treatment. Data are expressed as numbers (percentage) or mean (range)
| Adjuvant Chemo + CHMF | Adjuvant Chemo + Placebo | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | ||
| Gender, n (%) | 0.596 | ||
| Male | 57 (50%) | 61 (53%) | |
| Female | 57 (50%) | 54 (47%) | |
| Age | 59.4 ± 7.4 | 59.6 ± 7.5 | 0.861 |
| ECOG PS, n (%) | 0.99 | ||
| 0 | 2 (1.8%) | 2 (1.7%) | |
| 1 | 111 (97.4%) | 112 (97.4%) | |
| 2 | 1 (0.8%) | 1 (0.9%) | |
| Smoking history, n (%) | 0.224 | ||
| Smoked | 40 (35.1%) | 50 (43.5%) | |
| Never smoke | 74 (64.9%) | 65 (56.5%) | |
| Resection procedure, n (%) | 0.333 | ||
| Lobectomy | 108 (94.7%) | 112 (97.4%) | |
| Sublobectomy | 6 (5.3%) | 3 (2.6%) | |
| Video-assaciated, n (%) | 0.689 | ||
| Yes | 64 (56.1%) | 68 (59.1%) | |
| No | 50 (43.9%) | 47 (40.9%) | |
| pTNM stage, n (%) | 0.998 | ||
| Ib | 55 (48.2%) | 56 (48.7%) | |
| II | 22 (19.3%) | 22 (19.1%) | |
| III | 37 (32.5%) | 37 (32.2%) | |
| Chemo regimens, n (%) | 0.688 | ||
| NP | 48 (42.1%) | 45 (39.1%) | |
| NC | 66 (57.9%) | 70 (60.9%) | |
| TCM syndrome, n (%) | 0.862 | ||
| Qi deficiency | 55 (56.1%) | 58 (50.4%) | |
| Yin deficiency | 10 (8.8%) | 8 (7.0%) | |
| Qi-Yin deficiency | 49 (35.1%) | 49 (42.6%) |
Abbreviations: Chemo, chemotherapy; CHMF Chinese herbal medicine formula, ECOG PS Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status, NP Vinorelbine plus cisplatin, NC Vinorelbine plus Carboplatin
Adverse events during the adjuvant treatment phases. Values are expressed as numbers (percentage). Table presents grade I to IV adverse events in all patients during the adjuvant treatment phases. Adverse events are listed in descending order of frequency in the total patient population
| Adjuvant chemo + CHMF ( | Adjuvant chemo+ Placebo ( | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade 1/2 | Grade 3/4 | Total | Grade 1/2 | Grade 3/4 | Total | |
| Fatigue | 90 (78.9%) | 1 (0.8%) | 91 (79.7%) | 89 (77.45%) | 0 | 89 (77.45%) |
| Loss of appetite | 88 (77.2%) | 0 | 88 (77.2%) | 94 (81.7%) | 0 | 94 (81.7%) |
| Nausea | 77 (67.5%) | 1 (0.8%) | 78 (68.3%) | 77 (67%) | 0 | 77 (67%) |
| Leucopenia | 49 (43.6%) | 8 (7%) | 57 (50.6%) | 40 (34.8%) | 15 (13%) | 55 (47.8%) |
| Vomiting | 43 (37.3%) | 6 (4.4%) | 49 (41.7%) | 47 (40.9%) | 1 (0.8%) | 48 (41.7%) |
| Elevated TB | 37 (32.5%) | 1 (0.8%) | 38 (33.3%) | 40 (34.8%) | 0 | 40 (34.8%) |
| Constipation | 37 (32.5%) | 1 (0.8%) | 38 (33.3%) | 39 (33.9%) | 0 | 39 (33.9%) |
| Neutropenia | 34 (29.8%) | 11 (9.7%) | 45 (39.5%) | 37 (32.2%) | 17 (14.8%) | 54 (47%) |
| Anaemia | 29 (25.4%) | 0 | 29 (25.4%) | 28 (24.3%) | 1 (0.8%) | 29 (25.1%) |
| Dry mouth | 28 (24.6%) | 0 | 28 (24.6%) | 45 (39.1%) | 0 | 45 (39.1%) |
| Pain | 28 (24.7%) | 0 | 28 (24.7%) | 37 (32.2%) | 0 | 37 (32.2%) |
| Alopecia | 13 (11.4%) | 0 | 13 (11.4%) | 14 (12.2%) | 0 | 14 (12.2%) |
| ALT/AST increased | 12 (10.5%) | 1 (0.8%) | 13 (11.3%) | 15 (11.3%) | 0 | 15 (11.3%) |
| Elevated GGT | 11 (9.6%) | 2 (1.8%) | 13 (11.4%) | 9 (7.8%) | 1 (0.8%) | 10 (8.6%) |
| Diarrhoea | 9 (7.9%) | 0 | 9 (7.9%) | 20 (17.4%) | 0 | 20 (17.4%) |
| Thrombocytopaenia | 6 (5.3%) | 0 | 6 (5.3%) | 15 (13%) | 1 (0.8%) | 16 (13.8%) |
| Elevated CRE | 4 (3.5%) | 0 | 4 (3.5%) | 1 (0.9%) | 0 | 1 (0.9%) |
| Weight-decrease | 4 (3.5%) | 0 | 4 (3.5%) | 7 (6.1%) | 0 | 7 (6.1%) |
| Rash | 3 (2.6%) | 0 | 3 (2.6%) | 2 (1.7%) | 0 | 2 (1.7%) |
| Arhythmia | 2 (1.8%) | 0 | 2 (1.8%) | 2 (1.7%) | 1 (0.8%) | 3 (2.5%) |
| Pruritus | 2 (1.8%) | 0 | 2 (1.8%) | 4 (3.5%) | 0 | 4 (3.5%) |
| Elevated ALP | 1 (0.8%) | 0 | 1 (0.8%) | 1 (0.9%) | 0 | 1 (0.9%) |
Fig. 2Figures present adverse events which significantly decreased at one week (a) and two weeks (b) following chemotherapy in the CHMF group (solid line) compared with the placebo group (dotted line). * stands for P<0.05
Fig. 3Progression-free survival (A-1) and overall survival (B-1) of all patients and patients with stage Ib-IIIa (A/B2–4). Kaplan-Meier estimates of progression-free survival and overall survival as assessed by investigators in populations received adjuvant treatment between CHMF (Red) and placebo (Black) arms. P values were calculated using a two-sided log-rank test. HR, Hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; CHMF, Chinese herbal medicine formula