| Literature DB >> 34737781 |
Hui Huang1, Kuizhong Shan2, Min Cai1, Hong Chen1, Fengmei Wu1, Xiaoyan Zhao1, Huawei Zhuang1, Hong Li1, Suofang Shi3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chronic pulmonary heart disease (CPHD) is a common type of heart disease. In China, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the main causes of CPHD. At present, there is no specific therapy for COPD-induced CPHD, so it is of great importance to identify a new therapy for CPHD.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34737781 PMCID: PMC8563114 DOI: 10.1155/2021/6636426
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1Effect of YHWLP on the clinical symptom score of patients with CPHD. (a) Comparison of clinical symptom score after treatment vs. baseline in each group; (b) comparison of decrease in clinical symptom score (relative to baseline) between the two groups. Values are mean ± standard deviation. ∗∗P < 0.01 and ∗∗∗P < 0.001.
Figure 2Effect of YHWLP on pulmonary artery pressure in patients with CPHD. (a) Comparison of pulmonary artery pressure after treatment vs. baseline in each group; (b) comparison of decrease in pulmonary artery pressure (relative to baseline) between the two groups. Values are mean ± standard deviation. P < 0.05 and ∗∗∗P < 0.001.
Comparison of pulmonary function (after treatment vs. baseline) in each group.
| Group | FEV1 | FVC | FEV1/FVC | FEV1% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YHWLP ( | Baseline | 1.37 ± 0.45 | 2.51 ± 0.58 | 54.20 ± 7.84 | 56.95 ± 8.82 |
| After | 1.76 ± 0.54 | 2.90 ± 0.65 | 60.55 ± 6.19 | 63.06 ± 9.20 | |
| Control ( | Baseline | 1.44 ± 0.45 | 2.59 ± 0.57 | 54.46 ± 6.69 | 57.75 ± 9.68 |
| After | 1.50 ± 0.43 | 2.70 ± 0.52 | 56.38 ± 6.73 | 63.56 ± 8.77 | |
Notes: FEV1, forced expiratory volume in the first second; FVC, forced vital capacity; FEV1%, FEV1 as a percentage of predicted value. Values are mean ± standard deviation. P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01.
Comparison of increases in pulmonary function (relative to baseline) between the two groups.
| Group | FEV1 | FVC | FEV1/FVC | FEV1% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YHWLP ( | 0.39 ± 0.15 | 0.39 ± 0.28 | 6.35 ± 2.74 | 6.11 ± 3.49 |
| Control ( | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 0.21 ± 0.11 | 1.56 ± 0.52 | 4.72 ± 5.10 |
Notes: FEV1, forced expiratory volume in the first second; FVC, forced vital capacity; FEV1%, FEV1 as a percentage of predicted value. Values are mean ± standard deviation. P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001.
Comparison of PT, aPTT, Fbg, and D-dimer (after treatment vs. baseline) in each group.
| Group | PT (s) | aPTT (s) | Fbg (g/L) | D-D (mg/L) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YHWLP ( | Baseline | 14.64 ± 2.36 | 42.21 ± 3.77 | 5.59 ± 0.74 | 5.01 ± 1.24 |
| After | 11.69 ± 1.79 | 37.96 ± 2.99 | 2.93 ± 1.33 | 1.92 ± 0.98 | |
| Control ( | Baseline | 13.73 ± 1.55 | 40.79 ± 3.11 | 5.38 ± 0.69 | 5.42 ± 0.79 |
| After | 12.28 ± 1.33 | 38.67 ± 3.29 | 4.10 ± 0.87 | 3.89 ± 1.43 | |
Notes: PT, prothrombin time; aPTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; Fbg, fibrinogen; D-D, D-dimer. Values are mean ± standard deviation. P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01.
Comparison of decreases in PT, aPTT, Fbg, and D-dimer (relative to baseline) between the two groups.
| Group | PT (s) | aPTT (s) | Fbg (g/L) | D-D (mg/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YHWLP ( | 2.96 ± 1.72 | 4.25 ± 2.44 | 2.67 ± 1.61 | 3.08 ± 1.52 |
| Control ( | 1.45 ± 0.58 | 2.12 ± 0.64 | 1.28 ± 0.36 | 1.53 ± 1.69 |
Notes: PT, prothrombin time; aPTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; Fbg, fibrinogen; D-D, D-dimer. Values are mean ± standard deviation. P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01.
Figure 3Effect of YHWLP on the p-MBS/t-MBS ratio in peripheral blood of patients with CPHD. (a) Comparison of p-MBS/t-MBS ratio after treatment vs. baseline in each group. (b) Western blotting images. (c) Comparison of decrease in p-MBS/t-MBS ratio (relative to baseline) between the two groups. Values are mean ± standard deviation. P < 0.05 and ∗∗P < 0.01.