Literature DB >> 30145658

Observational retrospective study on socio-economic and quality of life outcomes in 41 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis 5 years after bracing combined with physiotherapeutic scoliosis-specific exercises (PSSE).

Christine Wibmer1, Pawel Trotsenko2, Magdalena M Gilg3, Andreas Leithner3, Matthias Sperl2, Vinay Saraph2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We analysed socio-economic- and health-related quality of life (primary outcome) and radiological outcome (secondary outcome) 5 years after full time rigid bracing (FTRB) plus physiotherapeutic scoliosis-specific exercises (PSSE) in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
METHODS: We included 41 patients (38 female and 3 male) treated with FTRB (Chênau brace) and PSSE (Schroth) between 2001 and 2010. The study protocol included a clinical and radiological examination, the completion of the SRS-24 questionnaire and acquisition of data on socio-economic factors (educational and employment status) and physical activity. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the data; differences between patients with mild (< 30°) and severe curves (30°-50°) regarding hrQoL outcomes were analysed using the Mann-Whitney U Test.
RESULTS: Primary outcomes showed full employment (higher education, 39%, and full-time work, 61%) and the majority of the patients (79.9%) performing moderate sports two to four times per week. The SRS-24 questionnaire produced a total mean score (MS) of 4.0 (79.9%). Patients with mild curves had a significantly better total score (MS 4.1 vs. MS 3.8, p = 0.020) and were more satisfied with the treatment (MS 4.3 vs MS 3.9, p = 0.020). As to the secondary outcomes, from start of bracing to follow-up (a mean of 6.7 years after brace weaning), the average Cobb angle changed from 28.6° to 25.6° (range 4°-48°); in 51.2% the curve angles could be maintained after weaning.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the literature, our results showed similar curve development and hrQoL (pain, self-image and function) and better results regarding satisfaction with treatment. In comparison with the average population, there were no disadvantages as to occupation, education and sports. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; Conservative treatment; Full time rigid bracing; Physiotherapeutic scoliosis-specific exercises; Quality of life questionnaire

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30145658     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-018-5746-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  27 in total

Review 1.  Standardization of criteria for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis brace studies: SRS Committee on Bracing and Nonoperative Management.

Authors:  B Stephens Richards; Robert M Bernstein; Charles R D'Amato; George H Thompson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  A prospective study of brace treatment versus observation alone in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a follow-up mean of 16 years after maturity.

Authors:  Aina J Danielsson; Ralph Hasserius; Acke Ohlin; Alf L Nachemson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Results of the Scoliosis Research Society instrument for evaluation of surgical outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A multicenter study of 244 patients.

Authors:  T R Haher; J M Gorup; T M Shin; P Homel; A A Merola; D P Grogan; L Pugh; T G Lowe; M Murray
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Health-related quality of life in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a matched follow-up at least 20 years after treatment with brace or surgery.

Authors:  A J Danielsson; I Wiklund; K Pehrsson; A L Nachemson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Braces for idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents.

Authors:  Stefano Negrini; Silvia Minozzi; Josette Bettany-Saltikov; Fabio Zaina; Nachiappan Chockalingam; Theodoros B Grivas; Tomasz Kotwicki; Toru Maruyama; Michele Romano; Elias S Vasiliadis
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Sports activity of patients with idiopathic scoliosis at long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Dominik Parsch; Vera Gärtner; Dario R C Brocai; Claus Carstens; Holger Schmitt
Journal:  Clin J Sport Med       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.638

7.  Back pain and function 22 years after brace treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a case-control study-part I.

Authors:  Aina J Danielsson; Alf L Nachemson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the Cobb angle: manual versus digital measurement tools.

Authors:  Michaela Gstoettner; Katrin Sekyra; Nadja Walochnik; Peter Winter; Roland Wachter; Christian M Bach
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-06-05       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Health-related quality of life in untreated versus brace-treated patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Aina J Danielsson; Ralph Hasserius; Acke Ohlin; Alf L Nachemson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Long-term results after Boston brace treatment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Johan Emil Lange; Harald Steen; Jens Ivar Brox
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2009-08-26
View more
  2 in total

1.  Characterization of trunk motion in adolescents with right thoracic idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Sébastien Pesenti; Solenne Prost; Vincent Pomero; Guillaume Authier; Mathieu Severyns; Elke Viehweger; Benjamin Blondel; Jean-Luc Jouve
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Quality of life of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients under brace treatment: a brief communication of literature review.

Authors:  Huan Wang; Daniel Tetteroo; J J Chris Arts; Panos Markopoulos; Keita Ito
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 4.147

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.