Literature DB >> 17549526

Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the Cobb angle: manual versus digital measurement tools.

Michaela Gstoettner1, Katrin Sekyra, Nadja Walochnik, Peter Winter, Roland Wachter, Christian M Bach.   

Abstract

The objective of this study is to determine the intraobserver and interobserver reliability of end vertebra definition and Cobb angle measurement using printed and digital radiographs of 48 patients with scoliosis. The Cobb angle and the end vertebra were assessed by six observers in 48 patients with scoliosis using printed and digital radiographs. Definition of end vertebra and measurement of the Cobb angle was repeated three times with a 3 week interval. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to determine the interobserver and intraobserver reliabilities. 95% prediction limits for the errors in measurements are provided. For the Cobb angle a mean ICC of 0.97 was determined for intra- and interobserver reliability measurement of the printed radiographs. For the electronic radiographs a mean ICC value of 0.93 was determined for interobserver reliability and a mean ICC value of 0.96 for intraobserver reliability. Intraobserver ICC for definition of end vertebrae was 0.8 for both methods. Interobserver ICC was 0.83 for the manual and 0.74 in the digital method. One pitfall in angle measurement implies the Cobb method itself which measures in two dimensions. Until we develop a proper tri-dimensional measuring system an error is introduced. For the Cobb angle measurement the definition of end vertebrae introduces the main source of error. Digital radiography does not improve the measurement accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17549526      PMCID: PMC2078306          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-007-0401-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  12 in total

1.  Digital radiography of scoliosis with a scanning method: initial evaluation.

Authors:  H Geijer; K Beckman; B Jonsson; T Andersson; J Persliden
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Digital radiography of scoliosis with a scanning method: radiation dose optimization.

Authors:  Håkan Geijer; Bert Verdonck; Karl-Wilhelm Beckman; Torbjörn Andersson; Jan Persliden
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-06-14       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability.

Authors:  P E Shrout; J L Fleiss
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  A comparison of manual versus computer-assisted radiographic measurement. Intraobserver measurement variability for Cobb angles.

Authors:  K G Shea; P M Stevens; M Nelson; J T Smith; K S Masters; S Yandow
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Measurement of scoliosis and kyphosis radiographs. Intraobserver and interobserver variation.

Authors:  D L Carman; R H Browne; J G Birch
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Variability of scoliosis measurement from spinal roentgenograms.

Authors:  C E Beekman; V Hall
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1979-06

7.  Evaluation of the reliability of radiological methods for registration of scoliosis.

Authors:  J A Sevastikoglou; E Bergquist
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1969

8.  Error analysis of scoliosis curvature measurement.

Authors:  C Gross; M Gross; S Kuschner
Journal:  Bull Hosp Jt Dis Orthop Inst       Date:  1983

9.  The significance of roentgenographic measurement in scoliosis.

Authors:  M Oda; S Rauh; P B Gregory; F N Silverman; E E Bleck
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 2.324

10.  Curve progression in idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  S L Weinstein; I V Ponseti
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  50 in total

1.  Intra- and inter-observer reliability of the Cobb measurement by chiropractic interns using digital evaluation methods.

Authors:  Jesse Cracknell; Douglas M Lawson; John A Taylor
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2015-09

2.  Measurement Performance of a Computer Assisted Vertebral Motion Analysis System.

Authors:  Reginald J Davis; David C Lee; Chip Wade; Boyle Cheng
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-07-17

Review 3.  A review of methods for quantitative evaluation of spinal curvature.

Authors:  Tomaz Vrtovec; Franjo Pernus; Bostjan Likar
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  The validity and reliability of "Spinal Mouse" assessment of spinal curvatures in the frontal plane in pediatric adolescent idiopathic thoraco-lumbar curves.

Authors:  Ayse Livanelioglu; Fatma Kaya; Vugar Nabiyev; Gokhan Demirkiran; Tüzün Fırat
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  A semi-automatic 3D ultrasound reconstruction method to assess the true severity of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Quang N Vo; Lawrence H Le; Edmond Lou
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Pelvic Floor Symptoms and Spinal Curvature in Women.

Authors:  Isuzu Meyer; Tatum A McArthur; Ying Tang; Jessica L McKinney; Sarah L Morgan; Holly E Richter
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.091

7.  Automatic quantification of spinal curvature in scoliotic radiograph using image processing.

Authors:  Anitha H; G K Prabhu
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 4.460

8.  Reliability of assessing the coronal curvature of children with scoliosis by using ultrasound images.

Authors:  Wei Chen; Edmond H M Lou; Phoebe Q Zhang; Lawrence H Le; Doug Hill
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 1.548

9.  Inter- and intraobserver reliability of the vertebral, local and segmental kyphosis in 120 traumatic lumbar and thoracic burst fractures: evaluation in lateral X-rays and sagittal computed tomographies.

Authors:  Benjamin Ulmar; Alexander Brunner; Markus Gühring; Traude Schmälzle; Kuno Weise; Andreas Badke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Observational retrospective study on socio-economic and quality of life outcomes in 41 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis 5 years after bracing combined with physiotherapeutic scoliosis-specific exercises (PSSE).

Authors:  Christine Wibmer; Pawel Trotsenko; Magdalena M Gilg; Andreas Leithner; Matthias Sperl; Vinay Saraph
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-08-25       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.