Literature DB >> 17873811

A prospective study of brace treatment versus observation alone in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a follow-up mean of 16 years after maturity.

Aina J Danielsson1, Ralph Hasserius, Acke Ohlin, Alf L Nachemson.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: The Swedish patients included in the previous SRS brace study were invited to take part in a long-term follow-up.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the rate of scoliosis surgery and progression of curves from baseline as well as after maturity. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Brace treatment was shown to be superior to electrical muscle stimulation, as well as observation alone, in the original SRS brace study. Few other studies have shown that brace treatment is effective in the treatment of scoliosis.
METHODS: Of 106 patients, 41 in Malmö (all Boston brace treatment) and 65 in Göteborg (observation alone as the intention to treat), 87% attended the follow-up, including radiography and chart review. All radiographs were (re)measured for curve size (Cobb method) by an unbiased examiner. Searching in the mandatory national database for performed surgery identified patients who had undergone surgery after maturity.
RESULTS: The mean follow-up time was 16 years and the mean age at follow-up was 32 years The 2 treatment groups had equal curve size at inclusion. The curve size of patients who were treated with a brace from the start was reduced by 6 degrees during treatment, but the curve size returned to the same level during the follow-up period. No patients who were primarily braced went on to undergo surgery. In patients with observation alone as the intention to treat, 20% were braced during adolescence due to progression and another 10% underwent surgery. Seventy percent were only observed and increased by 6 degrees from inclusion until now. No patients underwent surgery after maturity. Progression was related to premenarchal status.
CONCLUSION: The curves of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with a moderate or smaller size at maturity did not deteriorate beyond their original curve size at the 16-year follow-up. No patients treated primarily with a brace went on to undergo surgery, whereas 6 patients (10%) in the observation group required surgery during adolescence compared with none after maturity. Curve progression was related to immaturity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17873811     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31814b851f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  52 in total

1.  Design of the Bracing in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Trial (BrAIST).

Authors:  Stuart L Weinstein; Lori A Dolan; James G Wright; Matthew B Dobbs
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Providence nighttime bracing is effective in treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis even in curves larger than 35°.

Authors:  Ane Simony; Inge Beuschau; Lena Quisth; Stig Mindedahl Jespersen; Leah Yaccat Carreon; Mikkel Osterheden Andersen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Brace treatment versus observation alone for scoliosis associated with Chiari I malformation following posterior fossa decompression: a cohort study of 54 patients.

Authors:  Shifu Sha; Zezhang Zhu; Tsz Ping Lam; Xu Sun; Bangping Qian; Jian Jiang; Jack C Y Cheng; Yong Qiu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Bracing in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Dietrich Schlenzka; Timo Yrjönen
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 1.548

5.  Evolution of the curve patterns during brace treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Xin Zheng; Xu Sun; Bangping Qian; Tao Wu; Saihu Mao; Zezhang Zhu; Bin Wang; Yong Qiu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Effects of bracing in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Stuart L Weinstein; Lori A Dolan; James G Wright; Matthew B Dobbs
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Observational retrospective study on socio-economic and quality of life outcomes in 41 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis 5 years after bracing combined with physiotherapeutic scoliosis-specific exercises (PSSE).

Authors:  Christine Wibmer; Pawel Trotsenko; Magdalena M Gilg; Andreas Leithner; Matthias Sperl; Vinay Saraph
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-08-25       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Scoliosis - The current concepts.

Authors:  Dilip Kumar Sengupta; John K Webb
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.251

9.  Preference assessment of recruitment into a randomized trial for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Lori A Dolan; Vani Sabesan; Stuart L Weinstein; Kevin F Spratt
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Treatment of thoraco-lumbar curves in adolescent females affected by idiopathic scoliosis with a progressive action short brace (PASB): assessment of results according to the SRS committee on bracing and nonoperative management standardization criteria.

Authors:  Angelo G Aulisa; Vincenzo Guzzanti; Marco Galli; Carlo Perisano; Francesco Falciglia; Lorenzo Aulisa
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2009-09-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.