Literature DB >> 11563612

Health-related quality of life in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a matched follow-up at least 20 years after treatment with brace or surgery.

A J Danielsson1, I Wiklund, K Pehrsson, A L Nachemson.   

Abstract

No results on long-term outcome in terms of health-related quality of life (HRQL) have previously been presented for patients treated for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A consecutive series of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, treated between 1968 and 1977 before the age of 21, either with distraction and fusion using Harrington rods [surgical treatment group (ST), n=156; 145 females and 11 males] or with a brace [brace treatment group (BT), n=127; 122 females and 5 males] were followed at least 20 years after completion of the treatment. Ninety-four percent of ST and 91% of BT patients filled in a questionnaire comprising the SF-36, Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWB), Oswestry Disability Back Pain Questionnaire, parts of SRS/MODEM'S questionnaire and study-specific questions concerning the treatment, as a part of an unbiased personal follow-up examination including radiography and clinical examination. An age- and sex-matched control group of 100 persons was randomly selected and subjected to the same examinations. The results showed no differences in terms of sociodemographic data between the groups. Both ST and BT patients had a slightly, but significantly, reduced physical function using the SF-36 subscales, SF-36/Physical Component Summary (PCS) score as well as the Oswestry Disability Back Pain Questionnaire compared to the controls. Neither the mental subscales and the Mental Component Summary (MCS) score of SF-36 nor the PGWB index showed any significant difference between the groups. Forty-nine percent of ST, 34% of BT and 15% of controls admitted limitation of social activities due to their back [P<0.001 ST vs controls, P=0.0010 BT vs controls, and n.s. (P=0.024) ST vs BT], mostly due to difficulties with physical participation in activities or self-consciousness about appearance. Pain was a minor reason for limitation. No correlation was found between the outcome scores and curve size after treatment, curve type, total treatment time or age at completed treatment. Patients treated for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis were found to have approximately the same HRQL as the general population. A minority of the patients (4%) had a severely decreased psychological well-being, and a few (1.5%) were severely physically disabled due to the back.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11563612      PMCID: PMC3611508          DOI: 10.1007/s005860100309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  94 in total

1.  Mid-long-term outcome and degeneration of the remaining unfused lumbar intervertebral disc in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients who had posterior spinal fusion surgery.

Authors:  Chee Kidd Chiu; Chin Siong Tan; Weng Hong Chung; Siti Mariam Mohamad; Mun Keong Kwan; Chris Yin Wei Chan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Is physical activity contraindicated for individuals with scoliosis? A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Bart N Green; Claire Johnson; William Moreau
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2009-03

3.  Outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after brace treatment and surgery assessed by means of the Scoliosis Research Society Instrument 24.

Authors:  Karen Petra Weigert; Linda Marie Nygaard; Finn Bjarke Christensen; Ebbe Stender Hansen; Cody Bünger
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-11-25       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Right adolescent idiopathic thoracic curve (Lenke 1 A and B): does cost of instrumentation and implant density improve radiographic and cosmetic parameters?

Authors:  Scott Yang; Sean M Jones-Quaidoo; Matthew Eager; Justin W Griffin; Vasantha Reddi; Wendy Novicoff; Jeffrey Shilt; Ernesto Bersusky; Helton Defino; Jean Ouellet; Vincent Arlet
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Providence nighttime bracing is effective in treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis even in curves larger than 35°.

Authors:  Ane Simony; Inge Beuschau; Lena Quisth; Stig Mindedahl Jespersen; Leah Yaccat Carreon; Mikkel Osterheden Andersen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Predictors of shoulder level after spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Jan Henrik Terheyden; Mark Wetterkamp; Georg Gosheger; Viola Bullmann; Ulf Liljenqvist; Tobias Lange; Albert Schulze Bövingloh; Tobias L Schulte
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-07-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Epidemiology of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Markus Rafael Konieczny; Hüsseyin Senyurt; Rüdiger Krauspe
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 1.548

8.  Oral health-related quality of life in youth receiving cleft-related surgery: self-report and proxy ratings.

Authors:  Hillary L Broder; Maureen Wilson-Genderson; Lacey Sischo
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Observational retrospective study on socio-economic and quality of life outcomes in 41 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis 5 years after bracing combined with physiotherapeutic scoliosis-specific exercises (PSSE).

Authors:  Christine Wibmer; Pawel Trotsenko; Magdalena M Gilg; Andreas Leithner; Matthias Sperl; Vinay Saraph
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-08-25       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Does anterior shoulder balance in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis correlate with posterior shoulder balance clinically and radiographically?

Authors:  Scott Yang; Eric Feuchtbaum; Brian C Werner; Woojin Cho; Vasantha Reddi; Vincent Arlet
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.