Literature DB >> 30145156

Fitting two human atrial cell models to experimental data using Bayesian history matching.

Sam Coveney1, Richard H Clayton2.   

Abstract

Cardiac cell models are potentially valuable tools for applications such as quantitative safety pharmacology, but have many parameters. Action potentials in real cardiac cells also vary from beat to beat, and from one cell to another. Calibrating cardiac cell models to experimental observations is difficult, because the parameter space is large and high-dimensional. In this study we have demonstrated the use of history matching to calibrate the maximum conductance of ion channels and exchangers in two detailed models of the human atrial action potential against measurements of action potential biomarkers. History matching is an approach developed in other modelling communities, based on constructing fast-running Gaussian process emulators of the model. Emulators were constructed from a small number of model runs (around 102), and then run many times (>106) at low computational cost, each time with a different set of model parameters. Emulator outputs were compared with experimental biomarkers using an implausibility measure, which took into account experimental variance as well as emulator variance. By repeating this process, the region of non-implausible parameter space was iteratively reduced. Both cardiac cell models were successfully calibrated to experimental datasets, resulting in sets of parameters that could be sampled to produce variable action potentials. However, model parameters did not occupy a small range of values. Instead, the history matching process exposed inputs that can co-vary across a wide range and still be consistent with a particular biomarker. We also found correlations between some biomarkers, indicating a need for better descriptors of action potential shape.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30145156     DOI: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2018.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol        ISSN: 0079-6107            Impact factor:   3.667


  11 in total

Review 1.  An audit of uncertainty in multi-scale cardiac electrophysiology models.

Authors:  Richard H Clayton; Yasser Aboelkassem; Chris D Cantwell; Cesare Corrado; Tammo Delhaas; Wouter Huberts; Chon Lok Lei; Haibo Ni; Alexander V Panfilov; Caroline Roney; Rodrigo Weber Dos Santos
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Sensitivity of a data-assimilation system for reconstructing three-dimensional cardiac electrical dynamics.

Authors:  Matthew J Hoffman; Elizabeth M Cherry
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Calibration of Cohorts of Virtual Patient Heart Models Using Bayesian History Matching.

Authors:  Cristobal Rodero; Stefano Longobardi; Christoph Augustin; Marina Strocchi; Gernot Plank; Pablo Lamata; Steven A Niederer
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-10-21       Impact factor: 4.219

4.  Key aspects for effective mathematical modelling of fractional-diffusion in cardiac electrophysiology: a quantitative study.

Authors:  N Cusimano; A Gizzi; F H Fenton; S Filippi; L Gerardo-Giorda
Journal:  Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul       Date:  2019-12-25       Impact factor: 4.260

Review 5.  Calibration of ionic and cellular cardiac electrophysiology models.

Authors:  Dominic G Whittaker; Michael Clerx; Chon Lok Lei; David J Christini; Gary R Mirams
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med       Date:  2020-02-21

6.  Predicting left ventricular contractile function via Gaussian process emulation in aortic-banded rats.

Authors:  S Longobardi; A Lewalle; S Coveney; I Sjaastad; E K S Espe; W E Louch; C J Musante; A Sher; S A Niederer
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Creation and application of virtual patient cohorts of heart models.

Authors:  S A Niederer; Y Aboelkassem; C D Cantwell; C Corrado; S Coveney; E M Cherry; T Delhaas; F H Fenton; A V Panfilov; P Pathmanathan; G Plank; M Riabiz; C H Roney; R W Dos Santos; L Wang
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Mechanisms underlying pro-arrhythmic abnormalities arising from Pitx2-induced electrical remodelling: an in silico intersubject variability study.

Authors:  Yijie Zhu; Jieyun Bai; Andy Lo; Yaosheng Lu; Jichao Zhao
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-01

9.  Assessing model mismatch and model selection in a Bayesian uncertainty quantification analysis of a fluid-dynamics model of pulmonary blood circulation.

Authors:  L Mihaela Paun; Mitchel J Colebank; Mette S Olufsen; Nicholas A Hill; Dirk Husmeier
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 4.118

10.  Data-Driven Uncertainty Quantification for Cardiac Electrophysiological Models: Impact of Physiological Variability on Action Potential and Spiral Wave Dynamics.

Authors:  Pras Pathmanathan; Suran K Galappaththige; Jonathan M Cordeiro; Abouzar Kaboudian; Flavio H Fenton; Richard A Gray
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 4.566

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.