Literature DB >> 30127940

DNA double strand breaks induced by low dose mammography X-rays in breast tissue: A pilot study.

Julie Depuydt1, Tanguy Viaene1, Phillip Blondeel2, Nathalie Roche2, Rudy Van den Broecke3, Hubert Thierens1, Anne Vral1.   

Abstract

Breast tissue is very sensitive to ionizing radiation due to the presence of reproductive hormones, including estrogen. In the present pilot study, the efficiency of mammography X-rays to induce DNA double strand breaks (DSB) in mammary epithelial cells was investigated. For this, freshly resected healthy breast tissue was irradiated with 30 kV mammography X-rays in the dose range 0-500 mGy (2, 4, 10, 20, 40, 100 and 500 mGy). Breast specimens were also irradiated with identical doses of 60Co γ-rays as a radiation quality standard. With the γH2AX-foci assay, the number of DNA DSB induced by radiation were quantified in the mammary epithelial cells present in breast tissue. Results indicated that foci induced by 30 kV X-rays and γ-rays followed a biphasic linear dose-response. For 30 kV X-rays, the slope in the low dose region (0-20 mGy) was 8.71 times steeper compared with the slope in the higher dose region (20-500 mGy). Furthermore, compared with γ-rays, 30 kV X-rays were also more effective in inducing γH2AX-foci. This resulted in a relative biological effectiveness (RBE) value of 1.82 in the low dose range. In the higher dose range, an RBE close to 1 was obtained. In conclusion, the results indicated the existence of a low dose hypersensitive response for DSB induction in the dose range representative for mammography screening, which is probably caused by the bystander effect. This could affect the radiation risk calculations for women participating in mammography screening.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer; double strand breaks; mammography; radiation; γH2AX

Year:  2018        PMID: 30127940      PMCID: PMC6096109          DOI: 10.3892/ol.2018.9024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Lett        ISSN: 1792-1074            Impact factor:   2.967


  42 in total

Review 1.  Initiating cellular stress responses.

Authors:  Christopher J Bakkenist; Michael B Kastan
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2004-07-09       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Dose response and repair kinetics of gamma-H2AX foci induced by in vitro irradiation of whole blood and T-lymphocytes with X- and gamma-radiation.

Authors:  Laurence Beels; Joke Werbrouck; Hubert Thierens
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.694

3.  The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2007

4.  Evidence for a lack of DNA double-strand break repair in human cells exposed to very low x-ray doses.

Authors:  Kai Rothkamm; Markus Löbrich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-04-04       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Inducible response required for repair of low-dose radiation damage in human fibroblasts.

Authors:  Saskia Grudzenski; Antonia Raths; Sandro Conrad; Claudia E Rübe; Markus Löbrich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-07-26       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Mammography-oncogenecity at low doses.

Authors:  G J Heyes; A J Mill; M W Charles
Journal:  J Radiol Prot       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 1.394

7.  Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: assessing what we really know.

Authors:  David J Brenner; Richard Doll; Dudley T Goodhead; Eric J Hall; Charles E Land; John B Little; Jay H Lubin; Dale L Preston; R Julian Preston; Jerome S Puskin; Elaine Ron; Rainer K Sachs; Jonathan M Samet; Richard B Setlow; Marco Zaider
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-11-10       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  The dose-response relationship for dicentric chromosomes and γ-H2AX foci in human peripheral blood lymphocytes: influence of temperature during exposure and intra- and inter-individual variability of donors.

Authors:  Halina Lisowska; Aneta Wegierek-Ciuk; Anna Banasik-Nowak; Janusz Braziewicz; Maria Wojewodzka; Andrzej Wojcik; Anna Lankoff
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 2.694

9.  Direct evidence for the participation of gap junction-mediated intercellular communication in the transmission of damage signals from alpha -particle irradiated to nonirradiated cells.

Authors:  E I Azzam; S M de Toledo; J B Little
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-01-09       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Breast cancer in European Union: an update of screening programmes as of March 2014 (review).

Authors:  E Altobelli; A Lattanzi
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 5.650

View more
  1 in total

1.  A New Insight on the Radioprotective Potential of Epsilon-Aminocaproic Acid.

Authors:  Timur Saliev; Dinara Baiskhanova; Dmitriy Beznosko; Dinara Begimbetova; Bauyrzhan Umbayev; Talgat Nurgozhin; Ildar Fakhradiyev; Baimakhan Tanabayev; Dainius Pavalkis
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 2.430

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.