Literature DB >> 20660770

Inducible response required for repair of low-dose radiation damage in human fibroblasts.

Saskia Grudzenski1, Antonia Raths, Sandro Conrad, Claudia E Rübe, Markus Löbrich.   

Abstract

Ionizing radiation (IR) induces a variety of DNA lesions among which DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are the biologically most significant. It is currently unclear if DSB repair is equally efficient after low and high doses. Here, we use gamma-H2AX, phospho-ATM (pATM), and 53BP1 foci analysis to monitor DSB repair. We show, consistent with a previous study, that the kinetics of gamma-H2AX and pATM foci loss in confluent primary human fibroblasts are substantially compromised after doses of 10 mGy and lower. Following 2.5 mGy, cells fail to show any foci loss. Strikingly, cells pretreated with 10 microM H(2)O(2) efficiently remove all gamma-H2AX foci induced by 10 mGy. At the concentration used, H(2)O(2) produces single-strand breaks and base damages via the generation of oxygen radicals but no DSBs. Moreover, 10 microM H(2)O(2) up-regulates a set of genes that is also up-regulated after high (200 mGy) but not after low (10 mGy) radiation doses. This suggests that low radical levels induce a response that is required for the repair of radiation-induced DSBs when the radiation damage is too low to cause the induction itself. To address the in vivo significance of this finding, we established gamma-H2AX and 53BP1 foci analysis in various mouse tissues. Although mice irradiated with 100 mGy or 1 Gy show efficient gamma-H2AX and 53BP1 foci removal during 24 h post-IR, barely any foci loss was observed after 10 mGy. Our data suggest that the cellular response to DSBs is substantially different for low vs. high radiation doses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20660770      PMCID: PMC2922519          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1002213107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  41 in total

1.  Biological effects in unirradiated human tissue induced by radiation damage up to 1 mm away.

Authors:  Oleg V Belyakov; Stephen A Mitchell; Deep Parikh; Gerhard Randers-Pehrson; Stephen A Marino; Sally A Amundson; Charles R Geard; David J Brenner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Cell survival responses to environmental stresses via the Keap1-Nrf2-ARE pathway.

Authors:  Thomas W Kensler; Nobunao Wakabayashi; Shyam Biswal
Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 13.820

3.  Low-dose risk assessment.

Authors:  M Tubiana; A Arengo; D Averbeck; R Masse
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 4.  The impact of a negligent G2/M checkpoint on genomic instability and cancer induction.

Authors:  Markus Löbrich; Penny A Jeggo
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 60.716

5.  In vivo formation and repair of DNA double-strand breaks after computed tomography examinations.

Authors:  Markus Löbrich; Nicole Rief; Martin Kühne; Martina Heckmann; Jochen Fleckenstein; Christian Rübe; Michael Uder
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-06-13       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Leukocyte DNA damage after multi-detector row CT: a quantitative biomarker of low-level radiation exposure.

Authors:  Kai Rothkamm; Sheena Balroop; Jane Shekhdar; Patricia Fernie; Vicky Goh
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  A pathway of double-strand break rejoining dependent upon ATM, Artemis, and proteins locating to gamma-H2AX foci.

Authors:  Enriqueta Riballo; Martin Kühne; Nicole Rief; Aidan Doherty; Graeme C M Smith; María-José Recio; Caroline Reis; Kirsten Dahm; Andreas Fricke; Andrea Krempler; Antony R Parker; Stephen P Jackson; Andrew Gennery; Penny A Jeggo; Markus Löbrich
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2004-12-03       Impact factor: 17.970

8.  Megabase chromatin domains involved in DNA double-strand breaks in vivo.

Authors:  E P Rogakou; C Boon; C Redon; W M Bonner
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1999-09-06       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  Spatial organization of the mammalian genome surveillance machinery in response to DNA strand breaks.

Authors:  Simon Bekker-Jensen; Claudia Lukas; Risa Kitagawa; Fredrik Melander; Michael B Kastan; Jiri Bartek; Jiri Lukas
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2006-04-17       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Chromosome breakage after G2 checkpoint release.

Authors:  Dorothee Deckbar; Julie Birraux; Andrea Krempler; Leopoldine Tchouandong; Andrea Beucher; Sarah Walker; Tom Stiff; Penny Jeggo; Markus Löbrich
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2007-03-12       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  49 in total

1.  Role of the translationally controlled tumor protein in DNA damage sensing and repair.

Authors:  Jie Zhang; Sonia M de Toledo; Badri N Pandey; Guozheng Guo; Debkumar Pain; Hong Li; Edouard I Azzam
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Modeling DNA double-strand break repair kinetics as an epiregulated cell-community-wide (epicellcom) response to radiation stress.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 2.658

3.  Direct measurement of the 3-dimensional DNA lesion distribution induced by energetic charged particles in a mouse model tissue.

Authors:  Johanna Mirsch; Francesco Tommasino; Antonia Frohns; Sandro Conrad; Marco Durante; Michael Scholz; Thomas Friedrich; Markus Löbrich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Different Sequences of Fractionated Low-Dose Proton and Single Iron-Radiation-Induced Divergent Biological Responses in the Heart.

Authors:  Sharath P Sasi; Xinhua Yan; Marian Zuriaga-Herrero; Hannah Gee; Juyong Lee; Raman Mehrzad; Jin Song; Jillian Onufrak; James Morgan; Heiko Enderling; Kenneth Walsh; Raj Kishore; David A Goukassian
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 2.841

5.  Sister chromatid exchanges occur in G2-irradiated cells.

Authors:  Sandro Conrad; Julia Künzel; Markus Löbrich
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2011-01-15       Impact factor: 4.534

6.  Does the number of irradiated cells influence the spatial distribution of bystander effects?

Authors:  A Belchior; I Balásházy; O Monteiro Gil; P Vaz; P Almeida
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 2.658

7.  DNA double strand breaks induced by low dose mammography X-rays in breast tissue: A pilot study.

Authors:  Julie Depuydt; Tanguy Viaene; Phillip Blondeel; Nathalie Roche; Rudy Van den Broecke; Hubert Thierens; Anne Vral
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 8.  DNA damage-associated biomarkers in studying individual sensitivity to low-dose radiation from cardiovascular imaging.

Authors:  Won Hee Lee; Patricia K Nguyen; Dominik Fleischmann; Joseph C Wu
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2016-06-05       Impact factor: 29.983

9.  Oocytes can efficiently repair DNA double-strand breaks to restore genetic integrity and protect offspring health.

Authors:  Jessica M Stringer; Amy Winship; Nadeen Zerafa; Matthew Wakefield; Karla Hutt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Organoids as Complex In Vitro Models for Studying Radiation-Induced Cell Recruitment.

Authors:  Benjamin C Hacker; Marjan Rafat
Journal:  Cell Mol Bioeng       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 2.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.