Literature DB >> 31862856

Categorical Biases in Human Occipitoparietal Cortex.

Edward F Ester1, Thomas C Sprague2, John T Serences3.   

Abstract

Categorization allows organisms to generalize existing knowledge to novel stimuli and to discriminate between physically similar yet conceptually different stimuli. Humans, nonhuman primates, and rodents can readily learn arbitrary categories defined by low-level visual features, and learning distorts perceptual sensitivity for category-defining features such that differences between physically similar yet categorically distinct exemplars are enhanced, whereas differences between equally similar but categorically identical stimuli are reduced. We report a possible basis for these distortions in human occipitoparietal cortex. In three experiments, we used an inverted encoding model to recover population-level representations of stimuli from multivoxel and multielectrode patterns of human brain activity while human participants (both sexes) classified continuous stimulus sets into discrete groups. In each experiment, reconstructed representations of to-be-categorized stimuli were systematically biased toward the center of the appropriate category. These biases were largest for exemplars near a category boundary, predicted participants' overt category judgments, emerged shortly after stimulus onset, and could not be explained by mechanisms of response selection or motor preparation. Collectively, our findings suggest that category learning can influence processing at the earliest stages of cortical visual processing.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Category learning enhances perceptual sensitivity for physically similar yet categorically different stimuli. We report a possible mechanism for these changes in human occipitoparietal cortex. In three experiments, we used an inverted encoding model to recover population-level representations of stimuli from multivariate patterns in occipitoparietal cortex while participants categorized sets of continuous stimuli into discrete groups. The recovered representations were systematically biased by category membership, with larger biases for exemplars adjacent to a category boundary. These results suggest that mechanisms of categorization shape information processing at the earliest stages of the visual system.
Copyright © 2020 the authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EEG; categorization; fMRI; human; occipital cortex

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31862856      PMCID: PMC6975303          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2700-19.2019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  48 in total

1.  Visual categorization shapes feature selectivity in the primate temporal cortex.

Authors:  Natasha Sigala; Nikos K Logothetis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-17       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Category learning increases discriminability of relevant object dimensions in visual cortex.

Authors:  Jonathan R Folstein; Thomas J Palmeri; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Tripartite organization of the ventral stream by animacy and object size.

Authors:  Talia Konkle; Alfonso Caramazza
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Steady-state visually evoked potentials: focus on essential paradigms and future perspectives.

Authors:  François-Benoît Vialatte; Monique Maurice; Justin Dauwels; Andrzej Cichocki
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 11.685

5.  Perceptual learning modifies the functional specializations of visual cortical areas.

Authors:  Nihong Chen; Peng Cai; Tiangang Zhou; Benjamin Thompson; Fang Fang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Ocular artifacts in EEG and event-related potentials. I: Scalp topography.

Authors:  O G Lins; T W Picton; P Berg; M Scherg
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.020

7.  Prior expectations induce prestimulus sensory templates.

Authors:  Peter Kok; Pim Mostert; Floris P de Lange
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Parietal and Frontal Cortex Encode Stimulus-Specific Mnemonic Representations during Visual Working Memory.

Authors:  Edward F Ester; Thomas C Sprague; John T Serences
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Generative models of cortical oscillations: neurobiological implications of the kuramoto model.

Authors:  Michael Breakspear; Stewart Heitmann; Andreas Daffertshofer
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Attention during natural vision warps semantic representation across the human brain.

Authors:  Tolga Çukur; Shinji Nishimoto; Alexander G Huth; Jack L Gallant
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-21       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  11 in total

1.  Complementary Brain Signals for Categorical Decisions.

Authors:  Paul S Muhle-Karbe; Timo Flesch
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The Lords of the Rings: People and pigeons take different paths mastering the concentric-rings categorization task.

Authors:  Ellen M O'Donoghue; Matthew B Broschard; John H Freeman; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2021-10-04

3.  Cortical networks of dynamic scene category representation in the human brain.

Authors:  Emin Çelik; Umit Keles; İbrahim Kiremitçi; Jack L Gallant; Tolga Çukur
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2021-07-24       Impact factor: 4.644

4.  Conceptual knowledge shapes visual working memory for complex visual information.

Authors:  Chris R Sims; Rachel A Lerch; John A Tarduno; Robert A Jacobs
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Breaking the cardinal rule: The impact of interitem interaction and attentional priority on the cardinal biases in orientation working memory.

Authors:  Gi-Yeul Bae
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-10-17       Impact factor: 2.157

6.  Visual and Semantic Representations Predict Subsequent Memory in Perceptual and Conceptual Memory Tests.

Authors:  Simon W Davis; Benjamin R Geib; Erik A Wing; Wei-Chun Wang; Mariam Hovhannisyan; Zachary A Monge; Roberto Cabeza
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Adaptation aftereffects reveal how categorization training changes the encoding of face identity.

Authors:  Fabian A Soto; Karla Escobar; Jefferson Salan
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Interactions Between Visual Working Memory, Attention, and Color Categories: A Pupillometry Study.

Authors:  Thomas Wilschut; Sebastiaan Mathôt
Journal:  J Cogn       Date:  2022-02-07

9.  Scene wheels: Measuring perception and memory of real-world scenes with a continuous stimulus space.

Authors:  Gaeun Son; Dirk B Walther; Michael L Mack
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-07-09

10.  Delay-period activity in frontal, parietal, and occipital cortex tracks noise and biases in visual working memory.

Authors:  Qing Yu; Matthew F Panichello; Ying Cai; Bradley R Postle; Timothy J Buschman
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 9.593

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.