Literature DB >> 30126931

Early platelet count kinetics has prognostic value in lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes.

Raphael Itzykson1, Simon Crouch2, Erica Travaglino3, Alex Smith2, Argiris Symeonidis4, Eva Hellström-Lindberg5, Guillermo Sanz6,7, Jaroslav Čermák8, Reinhard Stauder9, Chiara Elena3, Ulrich Germing10, Moshe Mittelman11, Saskia Langemeijer12, Krzysztof Mądry13, Aurelia Tatic14, Mette Skov Holm15, Antonio Medina Almeida16, Aleksandar Savic17, Njetočka Gredelj Šimec18, Elisa Luño19, Dominic Culligan20, Agnes Guerci-Bresler21, Luca Malcovati3, Corine van Marrewijk12, David Bowen22, Theo de Witte23, Pierre Fenaux.   

Abstract

Prognosis of lower-risk (International Prognostic Scoring System [IPSS] low/intermediate-1) myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is heterogeneous and relies on steady-state assessment of cytopenias. We analyzed relative drops in neutrophil and platelet counts during the first 6 months of follow-up of lower-risk MDS patients. We performed a landmark analysis of overall survival (OS) of lower-risk MDS patients prospectively included in the European LeukaemiaNet MDS registry having a visit at 6 ± 1 month from inclusion to assess the prognostic relevance of relative drops in neutrophils and platelets, defined as (count at landmark - count at inclusion)/count at inclusion. Of 2102 patients, 807 were eligible for the stringent 6-month landmark analysis. Median age was 73 years. Revised IPSS was very low, low, and intermediate/higher in 26%, 43%, and 31% of patients, respectively. A relative drop in platelets >25% at landmark predicted shorter OS (5-year OS, 21.9% vs 48.6% with platelet drop ≤25%, P < 10-4), regardless of baseline IPSS-revised or absolute platelet counts. Relative neutrophil drop >25% had no significant impact on OS. We built a classifier based on red blood cell transfusion dependence (RBC-TD) and relative platelet drop >25% at landmark. Patients with none (62%), either (27%), or both criteria (11%) had 5-year OS of 53.3%, 32.7%, and 9.0%, respectively (P < 10-4). This classifier was validated in an independent cohort of 335 patients. Combining relative platelet drop >25% and RBC-TD at 6 months from diagnosis provides an inexpensive and noninvasive way to predict outcome in lower-risk MDS. This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00600860.
© 2018 by The American Society of Hematology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30126931      PMCID: PMC6113605          DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018020495

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Adv        ISSN: 2473-9529


  29 in total

1.  Evaluation of prostate-specific antigen declines for surrogacy in patients treated on SWOG 99-16.

Authors:  Daniel P Petrylak; Donna Pauler Ankerst; Caroline S Jiang; Catherine M Tangen; Maha H A Hussain; Primo N Lara; Jeffrey A Jones; Mary Ellen Taplin; Patrick A Burch; Manish Kohli; Mitchell C Benson; Eric J Small; Derek Raghavan; E David Crawford
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 2.  Basic concepts and methods for joint models of longitudinal and survival data.

Authors:  Joseph G Ibrahim; Haitao Chu; Liddy M Chen
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-05-03       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Platelet doubling after the first azacitidine cycle is a promising predictor for response in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia (CMML) and acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) patients in the Dutch azacitidine compassionate named patient programme.

Authors:  Lieke H van der Helm; Canan Alhan; Pierre W Wijermans; Marinus van Marwijk Kooy; Ron Schaafsma; Bart J Biemond; Aart Beeker; Mels Hoogendoorn; Bastiaan P van Rees; Okke de Weerdt; Jurgen Wegman; Ward J Libourel; Sylvia A Luykx-de Bakker; Monique C Minnema; Rolf E Brouwer; Fransien Croon-de Boer; Matthijs Eefting; Kon-Siong G Jie; Arjan A van de Loosdrecht; Jan Koedam; Nic J G M Veeger; Edo Vellenga; Gerwin Huls
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2011-10-08       Impact factor: 6.998

4.  Censoring distributions as a measure of follow-up in survival analysis.

Authors:  E L Korn
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1986 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Statistical analysis of proliferative index data in clinical trials.

Authors:  P Grambsch; T A Louis; R M Bostick; G A Grandits; L Fosdick; M Darif; J D Potter
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1994-08-30       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 6.  Incidence and clinical complications of myelodysplastic syndromes among United States Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Stuart L Goldberg; Er Chen; Mitra Corral; Amy Guo; Nikita Mody-Patel; Andrew L Pecora; Marianne Laouri
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-04-26       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent.

Authors:  Jerome Friedman; Trevor Hastie; Rob Tibshirani
Journal:  J Stat Softw       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.440

Review 8.  The World Health Organization (WHO) classification of the myeloid neoplasms.

Authors:  James W Vardiman; Nancy Lee Harris; Richard D Brunning
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Relationship of treatment-related cytopenias and response to lenalidomide in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Mikkael A Sekeres; Jaroslaw P Maciejewski; Aristotle A N Giagounidis; Kenton Wride; Robert Knight; Azra Raza; Alan F List
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-11-17       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  The myelodysplastic syndromes flow cytometric score: a three-parameter prognostic flow cytometric scoring system.

Authors:  C Alhan; T M Westers; E M P Cremers; C Cali; B I Witte; G J Ossenkoppele; A A van de Loosdrecht
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 11.528

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Which lower risk myelodysplastic syndromes should be treated with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation?

Authors:  Marie Robin; Pierre Fenaux
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 2.  Lower risk but high risk.

Authors:  Amy E DeZern
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2021-12-10

3.  Assessing the Prognosis of Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS).

Authors:  Annika Kasprzak; Kathrin Nachtkamp; Norbert Gattermann; Ulrich Germing
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 6.575

4.  A machine learning model of response to hypomethylating agents in myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Nathan Radakovich; David A Sallman; Rena Buckstein; Andrew Brunner; Amy Dezern; Sudipto Mukerjee; Rami Komrokji; Najla Al-Ali; Jacob Shreve; Yazan Rouphail; Anne Parmentier; Alexandre Mamedov; Mohammed Siddiqui; Yihong Guan; Teodora Kuzmanovic; Metis Hasipek; Babal Jha; Jaroslaw P Maciejewski; Mikkael A Sekeres; Aziz Nazha
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-08-12

5.  Influence of platelet count at diagnosis and during the course of disease on prognosis in MDS patients.

Authors:  Judith Strapatsas; Elena Calina Barbulescu; Michael Lauseker; Jennifer Kaivers; Barbara Hildebrandt; Kathrin Nachtkamp; Corinna Strupp; Martina Rudelius; Rainer Haas; Ulrich Germing
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 3.673

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.