Literature DB >> 16622120

Evaluation of prostate-specific antigen declines for surrogacy in patients treated on SWOG 99-16.

Daniel P Petrylak1, Donna Pauler Ankerst, Caroline S Jiang, Catherine M Tangen, Maha H A Hussain, Primo N Lara, Jeffrey A Jones, Mary Ellen Taplin, Patrick A Burch, Manish Kohli, Mitchell C Benson, Eric J Small, Derek Raghavan, E David Crawford.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The identification of surrogate endpoints that can replace true outcome endpoints is crucial to the rapid evaluation of new cancer drugs. Retrospective analyses of phase II and III trials in metastatic androgen-independent prostate cancer have shown associations between declines in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and survival. We evaluated PSA changes as potential surrogate markers for survival by using data from a clinical trial.
METHODS: Men with androgen-independent prostate cancer were randomly assigned to either docetaxel/estramustine (D/E) or mitoxantrone/prednisone (M/P) treatment on Southwest Oncology Group Protocol 99-16. Of 674 eligible patients, 551 had a baseline PSA measurement and at least one PSA measurement during the first 3 months on protocol. PSA level declines of 5%-90% and PSA velocity at 1, 2, and 3 months were tested for surrogacy by using three statistical criteria: Prentice's criteria, the proportion of treatment effect explained, and the proportion of variation explained. All statistical tests were two-sided.
RESULTS: Three-month PSA level declines of 20%-40%, a 2-month PSA decline of 30%, and PSA velocity at 2 and 3 months met all three surrogacy criteria. For example, a 3-month PSA decline of at least 30% was associated with a more than 50% decrease in the risk of death compared with the lack of such a decline (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.34 to 0.55; P < .001), and the increased risk of death for men treated with M/P compared with D/E (HR = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.02 to 1.51; P = .032) lost statistical significance after adjustment for this surrogate, whereas the decrease in risk of death associated with a 3-month 30% PSA decline remained statistically significant after adjustment for treatment. PSA level declines of 50%, commonly reported in clinical trials, did not meet the criteria for surrogacy.
CONCLUSIONS: Several PSA measures satisfied the surrogacy criteria for survival in a retrospective analysis of data from SWOG 99-16. However, these measures await prospective validation in future clinical trials of chemotherapy in men with androgen-independent prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16622120     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djj129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  77 in total

1.  Statistical controversies in clinical research: an initial evaluation of a surrogate end point using a single randomized clinical trial and the Prentice criteria.

Authors:  G Heller
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  Time to prostate specific antigen (PSA) nadir may predict rapid relapse in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) receiving docetaxel chemotherapy.

Authors:  Betsan M Thomas; Christian Smith; Jessica Evans; Michael R Button; Satish Kumar; Nachi Palaniappan; John Staffurth; Jacob S Tanguay; Jason F Lester
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  Prostate cancer: PSA as an intermediate end point in clinical trials.

Authors:  Gerhardt Attard; Johann S de Bono
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  PSA-based treatment response criteria in castration-resistant prostate cancer: promises and limitations.

Authors:  Urban Emmenegger; Yoo-Joung Ko
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Targeting DNA repair with combination veliparib (ABT-888) and temozolomide in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Maha Hussain; Michael A Carducci; Susan Slovin; Jeremy Cetnar; Jiang Qian; Evelyn M McKeegan; Marion Refici-Buhr; Brenda Chyla; Stacie P Shepherd; Vincent L Giranda; Joshi J Alumkal
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 3.850

6.  Germline BRCA mutation does not prevent response to taxane-based therapy for the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  David J Gallagher; Angel M Cronin; Matthew I Milowsky; Michael J Morris; Jasmine Bhatia; Peter T Scardino; James A Eastham; Kenneth Offit; Mark E Robson
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  End points of clinical trials in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: A systematic review.

Authors:  Giuseppe Colloca; Antonella Venturino; Ilaria Governato
Journal:  World J Methodol       Date:  2014-06-26

8.  Circulating tumor cells in prostate cancer diagnosis and monitoring: an appraisal of clinical potential.

Authors:  Giuseppe Galletti; Luigi Portella; Scott T Tagawa; Brian J Kirby; Paraskevi Giannakakou; David M Nanus
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.074

9.  Potential surrogate endpoints for prostate cancer survival: analysis of a phase III randomized trial.

Authors:  Michael E Ray; Kyounghwa Bae; Maha H A Hussain; Gerald E Hanks; William U Shipley; Howard M Sandler
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Chemotherapy for hormone-resistant prostate cancer: Where are we today?

Authors:  Tomas Buchler; Stephen J Harland
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2007-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.