Literature DB >> 25329932

Mathematical models for diffusion-weighted imaging of prostate cancer using b values up to 2000 s/mm(2) : correlation with Gleason score and repeatability of region of interest analysis.

Jussi Toivonen1,2, Harri Merisaari2,3, Marko Pesola1, Pekka Taimen4, Peter J Boström5, Tapio Pahikkala2, Hannu J Aronen1,6, Ivan Jambor1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate four mathematical models for diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) of prostate cancer (PCa) in terms of PCa detection and characterization.
METHODS: Fifty patients with histologically confirmed PCa underwent two repeated 3 Tesla DWI examinations using 12 equally distributed b values, the highest b value of 2000 s/mm(2) . Normalized mean signal intensities of regions-of-interest were fitted using monoexponential, kurtosis, stretched exponential, and biexponential models. Tumors were classified into low, intermediate, and high Gleason score groups. Areas under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) were estimated to evaluate performance in PCa detection and Gleason score classifications. The fitted parameters were correlated with Gleason score groups by using the Spearman correlation coefficient (ρ). Coefficient of repeatability and intraclass correlation coefficient [specifically ICC(3,1)], were calculated to evaluate repeatability of the fitted parameters.
RESULTS: The AUC and ρ values were similar between parameters of monoexponential, kurtosis, and stretched exponential (with the exception of the α parameter) models. The absolute ρ values for ADCm , ADCk , K, and ADCs were in the range from 0.31 to 0.53 (P < 0.01). Parameters of the biexponential model demonstrated low repeatability.
CONCLUSION: In region-of-interest based analysis, the monoexponential model for DWI of PCa using b values up to 2000 s/mm(2) was sufficient for PCa detection and characterization.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gleason score; diffusion-weighted imaging; intraclass correlation coefficient; prostate cancer; repeatability

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25329932     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.25482

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  20 in total

1.  Prospective evaluation of 18F-FACBC PET/CT and PET/MRI versus multiparametric MRI in intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer patients (FLUCIPRO trial).

Authors:  Ivan Jambor; Anna Kuisma; Esa Kähkönen; Jukka Kemppainen; Harri Merisaari; Olli Eskola; Jarmo Teuho; Ileana Montoya Perez; Marko Pesola; Hannu J Aronen; Peter J Boström; Pekka Taimen; Heikki Minn
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Radiomics and machine learning of multisequence multiparametric prostate MRI: Towards improved non-invasive prostate cancer characterization.

Authors:  Jussi Toivonen; Ileana Montoya Perez; Parisa Movahedi; Harri Merisaari; Marko Pesola; Pekka Taimen; Peter J Boström; Jonne Pohjankukka; Aida Kiviniemi; Tapio Pahikkala; Hannu J Aronen; Ivan Jambor
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Tournament leave-pair-out cross-validation for receiver operating characteristic analysis.

Authors:  Ileana Montoya Perez; Antti Airola; Peter J Boström; Ivan Jambor; Tapio Pahikkala
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 3.021

Review 4.  Diffusion and quantification of diffusion of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Yoshiko Ueno; Tsutomu Tamada; Keitaro Sofue; Takamichi Murakami
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-09-19       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 5.  Diffusion-weighted imaging in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Tsutomu Tamada; Yu Ueda; Yoshiko Ueno; Yuichi Kojima; Ayumu Kido; Akira Yamamoto
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 2.533

Review 6.  Computer-aided Detection of Prostate Cancer with MRI: Technology and Applications.

Authors:  Lizhi Liu; Zhiqiang Tian; Zhenfeng Zhang; Baowei Fei
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Molecular imaging and fusion targeted biopsy of the prostate.

Authors:  Baowei Fei; Peter T Nieh; Viraj A Master; Yun Zhang; Adeboye O Osunkoya; David M Schuster
Journal:  Clin Transl Imaging       Date:  2016-12-01

8.  Histogram analysis from stretched exponential model on diffusion-weighted imaging: evaluation of clinically significant prostate cancer.

Authors:  EunJu Kim; Chan Kyo Kim; Hyun Soo Kim; Dong Pyo Jang; In Young Kim; Jinwoo Hwang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Repeatability of radiomics and machine learning for DWI: Short-term repeatability study of 112 patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Harri Merisaari; Pekka Taimen; Rakesh Shiradkar; Otto Ettala; Marko Pesola; Jani Saunavaara; Peter J Boström; Anant Madabhushi; Hannu J Aronen; Ivan Jambor
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Evaluating Prostate Cancer Using Fractional Tissue Composition of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens and Pre-Operative Diffusional Kurtosis Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Edward M Lawrence; Anne Y Warren; Andrew N Priest; Tristan Barrett; Debra A Goldman; Andrew B Gill; Vincent J Gnanapragasam; Evis Sala; Ferdia A Gallagher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.