PURPOSE: To develop a multi-parametric model suitable for prospectively identifying prostate cancer in peripheral zone (PZ) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five radical prostatectomy patients (median age, 63 years; range, 44-72 years) had T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), T2-mapping, and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI at 1.5 Tesla (T) with endorectal coil to yield parameters apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), T2, volume transfer constant (K(trans)) and extravascular extracellular volume fraction (v(e)). Whole-mount histology was generated from surgical specimens and PZ tumors delineated. Thirty-eight tumor outlines, one per tumor, and pathologically normal PZ regions were transferred to MR images. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated using all identified normal and tumor voxels. Step-wise logistic-regression modeling was performed, testing changes in deviance for significance. Areas under the ROC curves (A(z)) were used to evaluate and compare performance. RESULTS: The best-performing single-parameter was ADC (mean A(z) [95% confidence interval]: A(z,ADC): 0.689 [0.675, 0.702]; A(z,T2): 0.673 [0.659, 0.687]; A(z,Ktrans): 0.592 [0.578, 0.606]; A(z,ve): 0.543 [0.528, 0.557]). The optimal multi-parametric model, LR-3p, consisted of combining ADC, T2 and K(trans). Mean A(z,LR-3p) was 0.706 [0.692, 0.719], which was significantly higher than A(z,T2), A(z,Ktrans), and A(z,ve) (P < 0.002). A(z,LR-3p) tended to be greater than A(z,ADC), however, this result was not statistically significant (P = 0.090). CONCLUSION: Using logistic regression, an objective model capable of mapping PZ tumor with reasonable performance can be constructed. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
PURPOSE: To develop a multi-parametric model suitable for prospectively identifying prostate cancer in peripheral zone (PZ) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five radical prostatectomy patients (median age, 63 years; range, 44-72 years) had T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), T2-mapping, and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI at 1.5 Tesla (T) with endorectal coil to yield parameters apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), T2, volume transfer constant (K(trans)) and extravascular extracellular volume fraction (v(e)). Whole-mount histology was generated from surgical specimens and PZ tumors delineated. Thirty-eight tumor outlines, one per tumor, and pathologically normal PZ regions were transferred to MR images. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated using all identified normal and tumor voxels. Step-wise logistic-regression modeling was performed, testing changes in deviance for significance. Areas under the ROC curves (A(z)) were used to evaluate and compare performance. RESULTS: The best-performing single-parameter was ADC (mean A(z) [95% confidence interval]: A(z,ADC): 0.689 [0.675, 0.702]; A(z,T2): 0.673 [0.659, 0.687]; A(z,Ktrans): 0.592 [0.578, 0.606]; A(z,ve): 0.543 [0.528, 0.557]). The optimal multi-parametric model, LR-3p, consisted of combining ADC, T2 and K(trans). Mean A(z,LR-3p) was 0.706 [0.692, 0.719], which was significantly higher than A(z,T2), A(z,Ktrans), and A(z,ve) (P < 0.002). A(z,LR-3p) tended to be greater than A(z,ADC), however, this result was not statistically significant (P = 0.090). CONCLUSION: Using logistic regression, an objective model capable of mapping PZ tumor with reasonable performance can be constructed. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Andriy Fedorov; Sang-Eun Song; Tina Kapur; Robert Owen; Emily Neubauer Sugar; Paul Nguyen; William M Wells; Clare M Tempany Journal: Clin Image Based Proced Date: 2014
Authors: Andriy Fedorov; Kemal Tuncali; Fiona M Fennessy; Junichi Tokuda; Nobuhiko Hata; William M Wells; Ron Kikinis; Clare M Tempany Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2012-05-29 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Uulke A van der Heide; Antonetta C Houweling; Greetje Groenendaal; Regina G H Beets-Tan; Philippe Lambin Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2012-07-06 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Shikha Chaganti; Louise A Mawn; Hakmook Kang; Josephine Egan; Susan M Resnick; Lori L Beason-Held; Bennett A Landman; Thomas A Lasko Journal: IEEE J Biomed Health Inform Date: 2018-12-28 Impact factor: 5.772
Authors: Berrend G Muller; Jurgen J Fütterer; Rajan T Gupta; Aaron Katz; Alexander Kirkham; John Kurhanewicz; Judd W Moul; Peter A Pinto; Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Cary Robertson; Jean de la Rosette; Rafael Sanchez-Salas; J Stephen Jones; Osamu Ukimura; Sadhna Verma; Hessel Wijkstra; Michael Marberger Journal: BJU Int Date: 2013-11-13 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Ryan L Brunsing; Natalie M Schenker-Ahmed; Nathan S White; J Kellogg Parsons; Christopher Kane; Joshua Kuperman; Hauke Bartsch; Andrew Karim Kader; Rebecca Rakow-Penner; Tyler M Seibert; Daniel Margolis; Steven S Raman; Carrie R McDonald; Nikdokht Farid; Santosh Kesari; Donna Hansel; Ahmed Shabaik; Anders M Dale; David S Karow Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2016-08-16 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Graham Sommer; Donna Bouley; Harcharan Gill; Bruce Daniel; Kim Butts Pauly; Chris Diederich Journal: Can J Urol Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 1.344