Literature DB >> 30124908

Sex-specific gene and pathway modeling of inherited glioma risk.

Quinn T Ostrom1,2,3, Warren Coleman4, William Huang5, Joshua B Rubin6, Justin D Lathia7, Michael E Berens8, Gil Speyer8, Peter Liao1, Margaret R Wrensch9, Jeanette E Eckel-Passow10, Georgina Armstrong2, Terri Rice9, John K Wiencke9, Lucie S McCoy9, Helen M Hansen9, Christopher I Amos11, Jonine L Bernstein12, Elizabeth B Claus13,14, Richard S Houlston15, Dora Il'yasova16,17,18, Robert B Jenkins19, Christoffer Johansen20, Daniel H Lachance21, Rose K Lai22, Ryan T Merrell23, Sara H Olson12, Siegal Sadetzki24,25,26, Joellen M Schildkraut27, Sanjay Shete, Ulrika Andersson28, Preetha Rajaraman29, Stephen J Chanock29,30, Martha S Linet29, Zhaoming Wang29,30,31, Meredith Yeager29,30, Beatrice Melin28, Melissa L Bondy2, Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan1.   

Abstract

Background: To date, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified 25 risk variants for glioma, explaining 30% of heritable risk. Most histologies occur with significantly higher incidence in males, and this difference is not explained by currently known risk factors. A previous GWAS identified sex-specific glioma risk variants, and this analysis aims to further elucidate risk variation by sex using gene- and pathway-based approaches.
Methods: Results from the Glioma International Case-Control Study were used as a testing set, and results from 3 GWAS were combined via meta-analysis and used as a validation set. Using summary statistics for nominally significant autosomal SNPs (P < 0.01 in a previous meta-analysis) and nominally significant X-chromosome SNPs (P < 0.01), 3 algorithms (Pascal, BimBam, and GATES) were used to generate gene scores, and Pascal was used to generate pathway scores. Results were considered statistically significant in the discovery set when P < 3.3 × 10-6 and in the validation set when P < 0.001 in 2 of 3 algorithms.
Results: Twenty-five genes within 5 regions and 19 genes within 6 regions reached statistical significance in at least 2 of 3 algorithms in males and females, respectively. EGFR was significantly associated with all glioma and glioblastoma in males only and a female-specific association in TERT, all of which remained nominally significant after conditioning on known risk loci. There were nominal associations with the BioCarta telomeres pathway in both males and females. Conclusions: These results provide additional evidence that there may be differences by sex in genetic risk for glioma. Additional analyses may further elucidate the biological processes through which this risk is conferred.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30124908      PMCID: PMC6303471          DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noy135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuro Oncol        ISSN: 1522-8517            Impact factor:   12.300


  49 in total

Review 1.  Sexual dimorphism in mammalian gene expression.

Authors:  John L Rinn; Michael Snyder
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 11.639

2.  A new multipoint method for genome-wide association studies by imputation of genotypes.

Authors:  Jonathan Marchini; Bryan Howie; Simon Myers; Gil McVean; Peter Donnelly
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2007-06-17       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  Pathway-based approaches for analysis of genomewide association studies.

Authors:  Kai Wang; Mingyao Li; Maja Bucan
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Identification of candidate susceptibility genes for colorectal cancer through eQTL analysis.

Authors:  Adria Closa; David Cordero; Rebeca Sanz-Pamplona; Xavier Solé; Marta Crous-Bou; Laia Paré-Brunet; Antoni Berenguer; Elisabet Guino; Adriana Lopez-Doriga; Jordi Guardiola; Sebastiano Biondo; Ramon Salazar; Victor Moreno
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 4.944

5.  The cyclic AMP pathway is a sex-specific modifier of glioma risk in type I neurofibromatosis patients.

Authors:  Nicole M Warrington; Tao Sun; Jingqin Luo; Robert C McKinstry; Patricia C Parkin; Sara Ganzhorn; Debra Spoljaric; Anne C Albers; Amanda Merkelson; Douglas R Stewart; David A Stevenson; David Viskochil; Todd E Druley; Jason T Forys; Karlyne M Reilly; Michael J Fisher; Uri Tabori; Jeffrey C Allen; Joshua D Schiffman; David H Gutmann; Joshua B Rubin
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 6.  Telomere maintenance and the etiology of adult glioma.

Authors:  Kyle M Walsh; John K Wiencke; Daniel H Lachance; Joseph L Wiemels; Annette M Molinaro; Jeanette E Eckel-Passow; Robert B Jenkins; Margaret R Wrensch
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2015-05-25       Impact factor: 12.300

7.  The Glioma International Case-Control Study: A Report From the Genetic Epidemiology of Glioma International Consortium.

Authors:  E Susan Amirian; Georgina N Armstrong; Renke Zhou; Ching C Lau; Elizabeth B Claus; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan; Dora Il'yasova; Joellen Schildkraut; Francis Ali-Osman; Siegal Sadetzki; Christoffer Johansen; Richard S Houlston; Robert B Jenkins; Daniel Lachance; Sara H Olson; Jonine L Bernstein; Ryan T Merrell; Margaret R Wrensch; Faith G Davis; Rose Lai; Sanjay Shete; Christopher I Amos; Michael E Scheurer; Kenneth Aldape; Irina Alafuzoff; Thomas Brännström; Helle Broholm; Peter Collins; Caterina Giannini; Marc Rosenblum; Tarik Tihan; Beatrice S Melin; Melissa L Bondy
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Imputation-based analysis of association studies: candidate regions and quantitative traits.

Authors:  Bertrand Servin; Matthew Stephens
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Quantifying the heritability of glioma using genome-wide complex trait analysis.

Authors:  Ben Kinnersley; Jonathan S Mitchell; Konstantinos Gousias; Johannes Schramm; Ahmed Idbaih; Marianne Labussière; Yannick Marie; Amithys Rahimian; H-Erich Wichmann; Stefan Schreiber; Khe Hoang-Xuan; Jean-Yves Delattre; Markus M Nöthen; Karima Mokhtari; Mark Lathrop; Melissa Bondy; Matthias Simon; Marc Sanson; Richard S Houlston
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Variants in the CDKN2B and RTEL1 regions are associated with high-grade glioma susceptibility.

Authors:  Margaret Wrensch; Robert B Jenkins; Jeffrey S Chang; Ru-Fang Yeh; Yuanyuan Xiao; Paul A Decker; Karla V Ballman; Mitchel Berger; Jan C Buckner; Susan Chang; Caterina Giannini; Chandralekha Halder; Thomas M Kollmeyer; Matthew L Kosel; Daniel H LaChance; Lucie McCoy; Brian P O'Neill; Joe Patoka; Alexander R Pico; Michael Prados; Charles Quesenberry; Terri Rice; Amanda L Rynearson; Ivan Smirnov; Tarik Tihan; Joe Wiemels; Ping Yang; John K Wiencke
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2009-07-05       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  15 in total

1.  Functional Characterization of Brain Tumor-Initiating Cells and Establishment of GBM Preclinical Models that Incorporate Heterogeneity, Therapy, and Sex Differences.

Authors:  Cesar A Garcia; Adip G Bhargav; Mieu Brooks; Paola Suárez-Meade; Sujan K Mondal; Natanael Zarco; Karim ReFaey; Mark Jentoft; Erik H Middlebrooks; Matija Snuderl; Anna Carrano; Hugo Guerrero-Cazares; Paula Schiapparelli; Rachel Sarabia-Estrada; Alfredo Quiñones-Hinojosa
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 6.009

2.  JAM-A functions as a female microglial tumor suppressor in glioblastoma.

Authors:  Soumya M Turaga; Daniel J Silver; Defne Bayik; Evi Paouri; Sen Peng; Adam Lauko; Tyler J Alban; Nozha Borjini; Sarah Stanko; Ulhas P Naik; Ruth A Keri; James R Connor; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan; Joshua B Rubin; Michael Berens; Dimitrios Davalos; Justin D Lathia
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 12.300

3.  Heritability and Genome-Wide Association Study of Plasma Cholesterol in Chinese Adult Twins.

Authors:  Hui Liu; Weijing Wang; Caixia Zhang; Chunsheng Xu; Haiping Duan; Xiaocao Tian; Dongfeng Zhang
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 5.555

4.  ARL3 is downregulated and acts as a prognostic biomarker in glioma.

Authors:  Yulin Wang; Weijiang Zhao; Xin Liu; Gefei Guan; Minghua Zhuang
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 5.531

Review 5.  Sex-specific aspects of epidemiology, molecular genetics and outcome: primary brain tumours.

Authors:  Emilie Le Rhun; Michael Weller
Journal:  ESMO Open       Date:  2020-11

6.  Sex Disparities in MGMT Promoter Methylation and Survival in Glioblastoma: Further Evidence from Clinical Cohorts.

Authors:  Anja Smits; Malgorzata Lysiak; Andreas Magnusson; Johan Rosell; Peter Söderkvist; Annika Malmström
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 4.241

7.  Environmental and sex-specific molecular signatures of glioma causation.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Claus; Vincent L Cannataro; Stephen G Gaffney; Jeffrey P Townsend
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 13.029

8.  DDX60 Is Associated With Glioma Malignancy and Serves as a Potential Immunotherapy Biomarker.

Authors:  Jingwen Zhang; Minjie Fu; Mengli Zhang; Jinsen Zhang; Zunguo Du; Hongyi Zhang; Wei Hua; Ying Mao
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 9.  Sex differences in cancer mechanisms.

Authors:  Joshua B Rubin; Joseph S Lagas; Lauren Broestl; Jasmin Sponagel; Nathan Rockwell; Gina Rhee; Sarah F Rosen; Si Chen; Robyn S Klein; Princess Imoukhuede; Jingqin Luo
Journal:  Biol Sex Differ       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 5.027

10.  Genome-Wide Association Study and Pathway Analysis for Heterophil/Lymphocyte (H/L) Ratio in Chicken.

Authors:  Jie Wang; Bo Zhu; Jie Wen; Qinghe Li; Guiping Zhao
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 4.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.