| Literature DB >> 30498476 |
Hui Liu1, Weijing Wang1, Caixia Zhang1, Chunsheng Xu2, Haiping Duan2, Xiaocao Tian2, Dongfeng Zhang1.
Abstract
Dyslipidemia represents a strong and independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Plasma cholesterol, such as total cholesterol (TC), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), is the common indicator of diagnosing dyslipidemia. Here based on 382 Chinese twin pairs, we explored the magnitude of genetic impact on TC, HDL-C, LDL-C variation and further searched for genetic susceptibility loci for them using genome-wide association study (GWAS). The ACE model was the best fit model with additive genetic parameter (A) accounting for 26.6%, common or shared environmental parameter (C) accounting for 47.8%, unique/non-shared environmental parameter (E) accounting for 25.6% for the variance in HDL-C. The AE model was the best fit model for TC (A: 61.4%; E: 38.6%) and LDL-C (A: 65.5%; E: 34.5%). While no SNPs reached the genome-wide significance level (P < 5 × 10-8), 8, 14, 9 SNPs exceeded the suggestive significance level (P < 1 × 10-5) for TC, HDL-C, LDL-C, respectively. The promising genetic regions for TC, HDL-C, LDL-C were on chromosome 11 around rs7107698, chromosome 5 around rs12518218, chromosome 2 around rs10490120, respectively. Gene-based analysis found 1038, 1033 and 1090 genes nominally associated with TC, HDL-C, LDL-C (P < 0.05), especially FAF1, KLKB1 for TC, KLKB1 for HDL-C, and NTRK1, FAF1, SNTB2 for LDL-C, respectively. The number of common related genes among TC, HDL-C and LDL-C was 71, including FAF1, KLKB1, etc. Pathway enrichment analysis discovered known related pathways-zinc transporters, metal ion SLC transporters for TC, cell adhesion molecules CAMs, IL-6 signaling for HDL, FC epsilon RI signaling pathway, NFAT pathway for LDL, respectively. In conclusion, the TC and LDL-C level is moderately heritable and the HDL-C level is lowly heritable in Chinese population. The genomic loci, functional genes and pathways are identified to account for the heritability of plasma cholesterol level. Our findings provide important insights into plasma cholesterol molecular physiology and expect future research to replicate and validate our results.Entities:
Keywords: GWAS; HDL; LDL; cholesterol; dyslipidemias; genetics; heritability; twins
Year: 2018 PMID: 30498476 PMCID: PMC6249314 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2018.00677
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ISSN: 1664-2392 Impact factor: 5.555
Model fit and proportion of variance for TC, HDL-C, LDL-C level accounted by genetic and environmental parameters.
| TC | ACE | 51.8 | (23.6–67.9) | 9.0 | (0–33.7) | 39.2 | (32.0–47.9) | 1996.9 | 757 | 482.9 | ||
| CE | – | – | 49.5 | (41.5–56.8) | 50.5 | (43.2–58.5) | 2010.3 | 758 | 494.3 | 13.4 | 2.49E−04 | |
| HDL-C | ||||||||||||
| CE | – | – | 69.4 | (63.7–74.4) | 30.6 | (25.6–36.3) | 1771.7 | 758 | 255.7 | 8.1 | 4.48E−03 | |
| AE | 74.9 | (69.5–79.4) | – | – | 25.1 | (20.6–30.5) | 1778.5 | 758 | 262.5 | 14.9 | 1.15E−04 | |
| LDL-C | ACE | 61.5 | (34.9–71.7) | 3.8 | (0–27.4) | 34.7 | (28.3–42.7) | 2028.1 | 760 | 508.1 | ||
| CE | – | – | 50.9 | (43.0–58.0) | 49.1 | (42.0–57.0) | 2049.4 | 761 | 527.4 | 21.2 | 4.06E−06 | |
, The best fitted model; −2LL, −2 Log Likelihood; df, degree of freedom; χ.
Figure 1Quantile-quantile plot for quality control check and visualizing crude association for genome-wide association study of HDL-C level. The x-axis shows the –log10 of expected P-values of association from chi-square distribution and the y-axis shows the –log10 of P-values from the observed chi-square distribution. The black dots represent the observed data, and the red line is the expectation under the null hypothesis of no association.
Figure 2Manhattan plot for genome-wide association study of HDL-C level. The x-axis shows the numbers of autosomes and the X chromosome, and the y-axis shows the –log10 of P-values for statistical significance. The dots represent the SNPs. None of the SNPs reached the genome-wide significance level (P < 5 × 10−8).
The summary of SNPs with P < 1 × 10−5 for association with HDL-C in typed GWAS data.
| 5q14.1 | 5 | 77,142,788 | 7.10E-07 | Uncharacterized LOC101929154 | ||
| rs28402213 | 4q24 | 4 | 106,517,449 | 7.51E-07 | Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 38 | |
| rs6468909 | 8q22.3 | 8 | 105,227,985 | 1.65E-06 | Regulating synaptic membrane exocytosis 2 | |
| rs72685070 | 8q22.3 | 8 | 105,250,237 | 1.71E-06 | Regulating synaptic membrane exocytosis 2 | |
| 5q14.1 | 5 | 77,161,489 | 2.22E-06 | Uncharacterized LOC101929154 | ||
| rs241178 | 8p21.1 | 8 | 28,626,418 | 2.67E-06 | Integrator complex subunit 9 | |
| rs56207115 | 12q13.13 | 12 | 52,994,896 | 3.08E-06 | Keratin 72 | |
| rs10939012 | 4p15.2 | 4 | 24,897,032 | 4.43E-06 | Coiled-coil domain containing 149 | |
| rs10053012 | 5q35.1 | 5 | 171,522,275 | 5.71E-06 | Serine/threonine kinase 10 | |
| 10p13 | 10 | 17,041,083 | 5.90E-06 | Cubilin | ||
| rs12511068 | 4p15.2 | 4 | 24,896,658 | 6.04E-06 | Coiled-coil domain containing 149 | |
| 5q14.1 | 5 | 77,142,829 | 6.05E-06 | Uncharacterized LOC101929154 | ||
| kgp10999245 (rs201647698) | 8q22.3 | 8 | 105,243,123 | 6.36E-06 | Regulating synaptic membrane exocytosis 2 | |
| 10p13 | 10 | 17,032,885 | 9.56E-06 | Cubilin |
kgp, 1,000 Genomes Project; CHR, chromosome. The content discussed in detail were in bold.
Figure 3Regional association plot showing signal around chromosomal loci of 5q14.1 for genome-wide association study of HDL-C level.
The top 20 genes from VEGAS2 gene-based analysis showing the strongest association with HDL-C level (P < 0.05) in typed GWAS data.
| 11 | 9 | 6,621,143 | 6,624,880 | 57.80 | 4.00E-06 | rs17834692 | 1.58E-04 | |
| 1 | 23 | 40,627,040 | 40,706,593 | 164.27 | 1.20E-05 | rs16827079 | 2.88E-05 | |
| 4 | 7 | 140,187,316 | 140,201,492 | 54.60 | 2.30E-05 | rs3208941 | 2.04E-05 | |
| 12 | 5 | 58,013,692 | 58,019,934 | 45.55 | 2.90E-05 | rs923828 | 1.79E-04 | |
| 5 | 15 | 126,984,712 | 126,994,322 | 99.49 | 3.80E-05 | rs248709 | 4.16E-04 | |
| 3 | 39 | 126,200,007 | 126,236,616 | 243.37 | 4.10E-05 | rs1091553 | 1.99E-04 | |
| 4 | 19 | 187,148,671 | 187,179,625 | 113.75 | 7.10E-05 | rs1912826 | 1.31E-04 | |
| 17 | 6 | 77,806,954 | 77,813,213 | 54.62 | 8.60E-05 | rs73422123 | 7.25E-05 | |
| 19 | 7 | 51,293,671 | 51,298,481 | 58.32 | 1.00E-04 | rs55735528 | 5.48E-04 | |
| 20 | 10 | 23,420,321 | 23,425,567 | 52.62 | 1.30E-04 | rs3746737 | 3.40E-04 | |
| 1 | 5 | 948,846 | 949,919 | 36.63 | 1.80E-04 | rs116002608 | 8.77E-05 | |
| 19 | 13 | 51,300,949 | 51,308,110 | 112.72 | 1.90E-04 | rs4801853 | 2.61E-04 | |
| 1 | 2 | 40,713,572 | 40,717,365 | 17.20 | 2.10E-04 | rs61200654 | 3.36E-05 | |
| 4 | 4 | 140,211,070 | 140,223,705 | 38.88 | 2.20E-04 | rs12642647 | 2.49E-05 | |
| 2 | 5 | 110,371,910 | 110,376,564 | 43.04 | 2.40E-04 | rs6726252 | 2.79E-04 | |
| 19 | 7 | 58,258,163 | 58,269,527 | 45.19 | 3.10E-04 | rs35919456 | 2.11E-04 | |
| 1 | 24 | 117,544,371 | 117,579,173 | 106.37 | 3.30E-04 | rs1555793 | 1.20E-04 | |
| 10 | 3 | 91,137,812 | 91,144,962 | 18.81 | 4.00E-04 | rs10887951 | 7.36E-04 | |
| 1 | 6 | 45,468,219 | 45,477,027 | 42.86 | 4.20E-04 | rs7541207 | 2.66E-04 | |
| 12 | 10 | 117,581,584 | 117,628,300 | 90.53 | 4.40E-04 | rs2279766 | 5.40E-04 |
Chr, chromosome. The content discussed in detail were in bold.
The top 20 pathway results-KEGG, Reactome, and Biocarta (emp-P < 0.05) using PASCAL program for HDL-C level in typed GWAS data.
| REACTOME_CELL_SURFACE_INTERACTIONS_AT_THE_VASCULAR_WALL | 7.11E-04 | 2.94E-04 | 3.14818 | 3.53165 |
| BIOCARTA_HER2_PATHWAY | 4.39E-04 | 4.35E-04 | 3.35736 | 3.36151 |
| KEGG_ | 6.25E-04 | 4.44E-04 | 3.20421 | 3.35262 |
| REACTOME_ | 6.27E-04 | 4.66E-04 | 3.20281 | 3.33161 |
| KEGG_ | 2.91E-03 | 6.20E-04 | 2.53649 | 3.20761 |
| BIOCARTA_AHSP_PATHWAY | 8.78E-04 | 8.80E-04 | 3.05652 | 3.05552 |
| REACTOME_ | 9.23E-04 | 9.30E-04 | 3.03463 | 3.03152 |
| REACTOME_ | 9.23E-04 | 9.50E-04 | 3.03463 | 3.02228 |
| REACTOME_ | 1.35E-03 | 1.17E-03 | 2.87021 | 2.93181 |
| BIOCARTA_CHREBP2_PATHWAY | 1.13E-03 | 1.30E-03 | 2.94743 | 2.88606 |
| REACTOME_INTRINSIC_PATHWAY | 1.51E-03 | 1.38E-03 | 2.82086 | 2.86012 |
| REACTOME_FORMATION_OF_FIBRIN_CLOT_CLOTTING_CASCADE | 1.51E-03 | 1.48E-03 | 2.82086 | 2.82974 |
| REACTOME_NEPHRIN_INTERACTIONS | 4.77E-03 | 1.82E-03 | 2.32139 | 2.73993 |
| BIOCARTA_ | 2.04E-03 | 1.96E-03 | 2.69087 | 2.70774 |
| KEGG_ | 7.95E-03 | 2.15E-03 | 2.09938 | 2.66756 |
| REACTOME_ | 2.36E-03 | 2.31E-03 | 2.62634 | 2.63639 |
| KEGG_ | 2.36E-03 | 2.34E-03 | 2.62634 | 2.63078 |
| KEGG_ | 2.36E-03 | 2.39E-03 | 2.62634 | 2.6216 |
| REACTOME_APC_C_CDH1_MEDIATED_DEGRADATION_OF_CDC20_AND_OTHER_ | 5.66E-03 | 2.61E-03 | 2.24755 | 2.58336 |
| KEGG_ | 2.96E-03 | 2.62E-03 | 2.52912 | 2.5817 |
chisq-P, Chi-square p-value. Chi-squared method (gene-score p-value were ranked and transformed to a uniform distribution, these values were then transformed by a chi-square quantile function, and summed). The content discussed in detail were in bold.
emp-P, empirical p-value. Empirical sampling method (gene-scores are transformed with chi-square quantile function and summed, then Monte Carlo estimate of the p-values were obtained by sampling random sets of the same size).