Soumya M Turaga1,2, Daniel J Silver2,3, Defne Bayik2,3, Evi Paouri4, Sen Peng5, Adam Lauko2, Tyler J Alban2,6, Nozha Borjini4, Sarah Stanko4, Ulhas P Naik7, Ruth A Keri3,8, James R Connor9, Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan3,10, Joshua B Rubin11, Michael Berens5, Dimitrios Davalos4,6, Justin D Lathia1,2,3,6,12. 1. Department of Biological, Geological, and Environmental Sciences, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, Ohio. 2. Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio. 3. Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio. 4. Department of Neurosciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio. 5. Cancer and Cell Biology Division, TGen, Phoenix, Arizona. 6. Department of Molecular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case, Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio. 7. Cardeza Center for Vascular Biology, Department of Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 8. Department of Pharmacology and Genetics and Genome Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio. 9. Department of Neurosurgery, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania. 10. Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio. 11. Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri. 12. Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive primary brain tumor and has a dismal prognosis. Previously, we identified that junctional adhesion molecule A (JAM-A), a cell adhesion molecule, is highly elevated in human GBM cancer stem cells and predicts poor patient prognosis. While JAM-A is also highly expressed in other cells in the tumor microenvironment, specifically microglia and macrophages, how JAM-A expression in these cells affects tumor growth has yet to be determined. The goal of this study was to understand the role of microenvironmental JAM-A in mediating GBM growth. METHODS: Male and female wild-type (WT) and JAM-A-deficient mice were transplanted intracranially with the syngeneic glioma cell lines GL261 and SB28 and were assessed for differences in survival and microglial activation in tumors and in vitro. RNA-sequencing was performed to identify differentially regulated genes among all genotypes, and differences were validated in vitro and in vivo. RESULTS: We found that JAM-A-deficient female mice succumbed to GBM more quickly compared with WT females and JAM-A-deficient and male WT mice. Analysis of microglia in the tumors revealed that female JAM-A-deficient microglia were more activated, and RNA-sequencing identified elevated expression of Fizz1 and Ifi202b specifically in JAM-A-deficient female microglia. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that JAM-A functions to suppress pathogenic microglial activation in the female tumor microenvironment, highlighting an emerging role for sex differences in the GBM microenvironment and suggesting that sex differences extend beyond previously reported tumor cell-intrinsic differences.
BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive primary brain tumor and has a dismal prognosis. Previously, we identified that junctional adhesion molecule A (JAM-A), a cell adhesion molecule, is highly elevated in human GBM cancer stem cells and predicts poor patient prognosis. While JAM-A is also highly expressed in other cells in the tumor microenvironment, specifically microglia and macrophages, how JAM-A expression in these cells affects tumor growth has yet to be determined. The goal of this study was to understand the role of microenvironmental JAM-A in mediating GBM growth. METHODS: Male and female wild-type (WT) and JAM-A-deficient mice were transplanted intracranially with the syngeneic glioma cell lines GL261 and SB28 and were assessed for differences in survival and microglial activation in tumors and in vitro. RNA-sequencing was performed to identify differentially regulated genes among all genotypes, and differences were validated in vitro and in vivo. RESULTS: We found that JAM-A-deficient female mice succumbed to GBM more quickly compared with WT females and JAM-A-deficient and male WT mice. Analysis of microglia in the tumors revealed that female JAM-A-deficient microglia were more activated, and RNA-sequencing identified elevated expression of Fizz1 and Ifi202b specifically in JAM-A-deficient female microglia. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that JAM-A functions to suppress pathogenic microglial activation in the female tumor microenvironment, highlighting an emerging role for sex differences in the GBM microenvironment and suggesting that sex differences extend beyond previously reported tumor cell-intrinsic differences.
Authors: Quinn T Ostrom; Haley Gittleman; Jordan Xu; Courtney Kromer; Yingli Wolinsky; Carol Kruchko; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2016-10-01 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Quinn T Ostrom; Warren Coleman; William Huang; Joshua B Rubin; Justin D Lathia; Michael E Berens; Gil Speyer; Peter Liao; Margaret R Wrensch; Jeanette E Eckel-Passow; Georgina Armstrong; Terri Rice; John K Wiencke; Lucie S McCoy; Helen M Hansen; Christopher I Amos; Jonine L Bernstein; Elizabeth B Claus; Richard S Houlston; Dora Il'yasova; Robert B Jenkins; Christoffer Johansen; Daniel H Lachance; Rose K Lai; Ryan T Merrell; Sara H Olson; Siegal Sadetzki; Joellen M Schildkraut; Sanjay Shete; Ulrika Andersson; Preetha Rajaraman; Stephen J Chanock; Martha S Linet; Zhaoming Wang; Meredith Yeager; Beatrice Melin; Melissa L Bondy; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2019-01-01 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Cyril Neftel; Julie Laffy; Mariella G Filbin; Toshiro Hara; Marni E Shore; Gilbert J Rahme; Alyssa R Richman; Dana Silverbush; McKenzie L Shaw; Christine M Hebert; John Dewitt; Simon Gritsch; Elizabeth M Perez; L Nicolas Gonzalez Castro; Xiaoyang Lan; Nicholas Druck; Christopher Rodman; Danielle Dionne; Alexander Kaplan; Mia S Bertalan; Julia Small; Kristine Pelton; Sarah Becker; Dennis Bonal; Quang-De Nguyen; Rachel L Servis; Jeremy M Fung; Ravindra Mylvaganam; Lisa Mayr; Johannes Gojo; Christine Haberler; Rene Geyeregger; Thomas Czech; Irene Slavc; Brian V Nahed; William T Curry; Bob S Carter; Hiroaki Wakimoto; Priscilla K Brastianos; Tracy T Batchelor; Anat Stemmer-Rachamimov; Maria Martinez-Lage; Matthew P Frosch; Ivan Stamenkovic; Nicolo Riggi; Esther Rheinbay; Michelle Monje; Orit Rozenblatt-Rosen; Daniel P Cahill; Anoop P Patel; Tony Hunter; Inder M Verma; Keith L Ligon; David N Louis; Aviv Regev; Bradley E Bernstein; Itay Tirosh; Mario L Suvà Journal: Cell Date: 2019-07-18 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Rahul A Jonas; Ti-Fei Yuan; Yu-Xiang Liang; Jost B Jonas; David K C Tay; Rutledge G Ellis-Behnke Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-02-21 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Wenchao Zhou; Susan Q Ke; Zhi Huang; William Flavahan; Xiaoguang Fang; Jeremy Paul; Ling Wu; Andrew E Sloan; Roger E McLendon; Xiaoxia Li; Jeremy N Rich; Shideng Bao Journal: Nat Cell Biol Date: 2015-01-12 Impact factor: 28.824
Authors: Cesar A Garcia; Adip G Bhargav; Mieu Brooks; Paola Suárez-Meade; Sujan K Mondal; Natanael Zarco; Karim ReFaey; Mark Jentoft; Erik H Middlebrooks; Matija Snuderl; Anna Carrano; Hugo Guerrero-Cazares; Paula Schiapparelli; Rachel Sarabia-Estrada; Alfredo Quiñones-Hinojosa Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2021-08-31 Impact factor: 6.009
Authors: Mingwei Zhang; Hong Chen; Bo Liang; Xuezhen Wang; Ning Gu; Fangqin Xue; Qiuyuan Yue; Qiuyu Zhang; Jinsheng Hong Journal: Front Mol Biosci Date: 2021-12-06