Ovidiu Paun1, Koen J F Verhoeven2, Christina L Richards3. 1. Department for Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna, Vienna, 1030, Austria. 2. Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW), Wageningen, the Netherlands. 3. Department of Integrative Biology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, 33620, USA.
Abstract
Contents Summary 738 I. Introduction 738 II. RRBS loci as genome-wide epigenetic markers 739 III. Exploiting functional annotation of RRBS loci 739 IV. Limitations of RRBS methods for nonmodel species 740 V. Maximising the impact of RRBS in plants 741 VI. Conclusions 741 Acknowledgements 741 SUMMARY: Investigating the features and implications of epigenetic mechanisms across the breadth of organisms and ecosystems is important for understanding the ecological relevance of epigenetics. Several cost-effective reduced representation bisulfite sequencing approaches (RRBS) have been recently developed and applied to different organisms that lack a well annotated reference genome. These new approaches improve the assessment of epigenetic diversity in ecological settings and may provide functional insights. We assess here the opportunities and limitations of RRBS in nonmodel plant species. Well thought out experimental designs that include complementary gene expression studies, and the improvement of genomics resources for the target group, promise to maximize the effect of future RRBS studies.
Contents Summary 738 I. Introduction 738 II. RRBS loci as genome-wide epigenetic markers 739 III. Exploiting functional annotation of RRBS loci 739 IV. Limitations of RRBS methods for nonmodel species 740 V. Maximising the impact of RRBS in plants 741 VI. Conclusions 741 Acknowledgements 741 SUMMARY: Investigating the features and implications of epigenetic mechanisms across the breadth of organisms and ecosystems is important for understanding the ecological relevance of epigenetics. Several cost-effective reduced representation bisulfite sequencing approaches (RRBS) have been recently developed and applied to different organisms that lack a well annotated reference genome. These new approaches improve the assessment of epigenetic diversity in ecological settings and may provide functional insights. We assess here the opportunities and limitations of RRBS in nonmodel plant species. Well thought out experimental designs that include complementary gene expression studies, and the improvement of genomics resources for the target group, promise to maximize the effect of future RRBS studies.
Authors: Thomas P van Gurp; Niels C A M Wagemaker; Björn Wouters; Philippine Vergeer; Joop N J Ouborg; Koen J F Verhoeven Journal: Nat Methods Date: 2016-02-08 Impact factor: 28.547
Authors: Sandra Cortijo; René Wardenaar; Maria Colomé-Tatché; Arthur Gilly; Mathilde Etcheverry; Karine Labadie; Erwann Caillieux; Fréderic Hospital; Jean-Marc Aury; Patrick Wincker; François Roudier; Ritsert C Jansen; Vincent Colot; Frank Johannes Journal: Science Date: 2014-02-06 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Christina L Richards; Conchita Alonso; Claude Becker; Oliver Bossdorf; Etienne Bucher; Maria Colomé-Tatché; Walter Durka; Jan Engelhardt; Bence Gaspar; Andreas Gogol-Döring; Ivo Grosse; Thomas P van Gurp; Katrin Heer; Ilkka Kronholm; Christian Lampei; Vít Latzel; Marie Mirouze; Lars Opgenoorth; Ovidiu Paun; Sonja J Prohaska; Stefan A Rensing; Peter F Stadler; Emiliano Trucchi; Kristian Ullrich; Koen J F Verhoeven Journal: Ecol Lett Date: 2017-10-12 Impact factor: 9.492
Authors: Steven R Eichten; Roman Briskine; Jawon Song; Qing Li; Ruth Swanson-Wagner; Peter J Hermanson; Amanda J Waters; Evan Starr; Patrick T West; Peter Tiffin; Chad L Myers; Matthew W Vaughn; Nathan M Springer Journal: Plant Cell Date: 2013-08-06 Impact factor: 11.277
Authors: Robert J Schmitz; Yupeng He; Oswaldo Valdés-López; Saad M Khan; Trupti Joshi; Mark A Urich; Joseph R Nery; Brian Diers; Dong Xu; Gary Stacey; Joseph R Ecker Journal: Genome Res Date: 2013-06-05 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: R Alan Harris; Ting Wang; Cristian Coarfa; Raman P Nagarajan; Chibo Hong; Sara L Downey; Brett E Johnson; Shaun D Fouse; Allen Delaney; Yongjun Zhao; Adam Olshen; Tracy Ballinger; Xin Zhou; Kevin J Forsberg; Junchen Gu; Lorigail Echipare; Henriette O'Geen; Ryan Lister; Mattia Pelizzola; Yuanxin Xi; Charles B Epstein; Bradley E Bernstein; R David Hawkins; Bing Ren; Wen-Yu Chung; Hongcang Gu; Christoph Bock; Andreas Gnirke; Michael Q Zhang; David Haussler; Joseph R Ecker; Wei Li; Peggy J Farnham; Robert A Waterland; Alexander Meissner; Marco A Marra; Martin Hirst; Aleksandar Milosavljevic; Joseph F Costello Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2010-09-19 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Emiliano Trucchi; Anna B Mazzarella; Gregor D Gilfillan; Maria T Lorenzo; Peter Schönswetter; Ovidiu Paun Journal: Mol Ecol Date: 2016-03-28 Impact factor: 6.185
Authors: Jeannie Mounger; Malika L Ainouche; Oliver Bossdorf; Armand Cavé-Radet; Bo Li; Madalin Parepa; Armel Salmon; Ji Yang; Christina L Richards Journal: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Date: 2021-04-19 Impact factor: 6.671
Authors: Sabrina M McNew; M Teresa Boquete; Sebastian Espinoza-Ulloa; Jose A Andres; Niels C A M Wagemaker; Sarah A Knutie; Christina L Richards; Dale H Clayton Journal: Ecol Evol Date: 2021-05-03 Impact factor: 2.912
Authors: Olaf Werner; Ángela S Prudencio; Elena de la Cruz-Martínez; Marta Nieto-Lugilde; Pedro Martínez-Gómez; Rosa M Ros Journal: Front Plant Sci Date: 2020-05-28 Impact factor: 5.753
Authors: Christoph C F Schinkel; Eleni Syngelaki; Bernhard Kirchheimer; Stefan Dullinger; Simone Klatt; Elvira Hörandl Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2020-05-07 Impact factor: 5.923