| Literature DB >> 30115821 |
Przemysław Sitarek1, Ewelina Synowiec2, Tomasz Kowalczyk3, Tomasz Śliwiński4, Ewa Skała5.
Abstract
As the current cancer treatment success rate is not sufficient, interest has grown in plants as possible sources of anti-cancer compounds. One such plant with a broad spectrum of activity is Lenourus sibiricus of the family Lamiaceae. This study investigates for the first time both the genotoxic and cytotoxic activities of TR (transformed) and AtPAP1 TR (with over-expression of transcriptional factor) root extracts of Lenourus sibiricus against various cancer cell lines (CCRF-CEM, K-562 and A549). Both tested extracts showed a cytotoxic effect on CCRF-CEM and K-562 cell lines, but strongest activity was observed for the AtPAP1 TR extract. No cytotoxic effect was observed against the A549 cell line in the tested concentration range, and it was found that both tested extracts may induce apoptosis by decreasing mitochondrial membrane potential and inducing nDNA damage lesion in the TP53 region and mtDNA in ND1 (mitochondrially encoded NADH: ubiquinone oxidoreductase core subunit 1) and ND5 (mitochondrially encoded NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase core subunit 5) regions in K-562 and CCRF-CEM. Our results confirmed that TR and AtPAP1 TR root extracts from L. sibiricus are cytotoxic and genotoxic against different model cell lines (CCRF-CEM and K-562). However, the observed genotoxicity of both extracts needs to be confirmed by additional studies. These preclinical observations support the use of L. sibiricus with other pharmacological purposes.Entities:
Keywords: AtPAP1 transgenic roots of Leonurus sibiricus; cytotoxic effect; genotoxic effect; mitochondrial membrane potential; mtDNA copy number
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30115821 PMCID: PMC6222913 DOI: 10.3390/molecules23082049
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Phenolic acids content in TR and AtPAP1 TR roots of L. sibircus. Data from our previous studies [15,17].
| Phenolic Compounds | TR Extract (µg/g DW) | AtPAP1 TR Transgenic Extract from Bioreactor (µg/g DW) |
|---|---|---|
|
| 8 ± 0.4 a | 7 ± 1 a |
|
| 4104 ± 8.7 a | 21,520 ± 1160 c |
|
| 4176 ± 9.0 a | 14,500 ± 600 d |
|
| 30 ± 0.1 a | 20 ± 4 a |
|
| 660 ± 27.1 a | 1870 ± 160 c |
The phenolic acids were determined in 80% aqueous methanol root extracts from TR (used as the control) and AtPAP1 TR grown in bioreactor. Different superscript letter within the rows indicates significant differences in the mean values at p ˂ 0.05 (the Kruskal-Wallis test).
Figure 1The effect of TR and AtPAP1 TR root extract of L. sibiricus (in concentrations of 0.019–5 mg/mL) on (A) CCRF-CEM, (B) K562 and (C) A549 cells viability. The data represent the mean of 3 measurements. *: p < 0.05 TR vs. AtPAP1 TR.
Figure 2The effect of TR and AtPAP1 TR root extracts of L. sibiricus on mitochondrial membrane potential in CCRF-CEM, K562 and A549 cells. MMP is expressed as a ratio of 530 nm/590 nm to 485 nm/538 nm (aggregates to monomer) fluorescence, as quantified with a fluorescent plate reader after JC-1 staining. The data represent means ± standard deviation (SD). *: p < 0.05 Control vs. TR and AtPAP1 TR. #: p < 0.05 TR vs. AtPAP1 TR.
Figure 3The effect of TR and AtPAP1 TR root extracts of L. sibiricus on mitochondrial DNA copy number in an CCRF-CEM, K562 and A549 cell line measured by real-time quantitative PCR. The data represent means ± SD. *: p < 0.05 Control vs. TR and AtPAP1 TR. #: p < 0.05 TR vs. AtPAP1 TR.
Figure 4The effect of TR and AtPAP1 TR root extracts of L. sibiricus on mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) lesion frequency per 10 kb DNA in (A) ND1 and (B) ND5 genes, estimated by SLR-qRT-PCR amplification of total DNA from CCRF-CEM, K562 and A549. The data represent means ± SD. *: p < 0.05 Control vs. TR and AtPAP1 TR. #: p < 0.05 TR vs. AtPAP1 TR.
Figure 5The effect of TR and AtPAP1 TR root extracts of L. sibiricus on nucelar DNA (nDNA) lesion frequency per 10 kb DNA in (A) HPRT1 and (B) TP53 genes, estimated by SLR-qRT-PCR amplification of total DNA from CCRF-CEM, K562 and A549. The data represent means ± SD. *: p < 0.05 Control vs. TR and AtPAP1 TR. #: p < 0.05 TR vs. AtPAP1 TR.
Sequence of oligonucleotides used in this study.
| Genome | Target Gene | Forward Primer Sequences (5′→3′) | Reverse Primer Sequence (5′→3′) | Amplicon Length (bp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mitochondrial | Long fragment: ATGGCCAACCTCCTACTCCT | Long fragment: GATGAGTGTGCCTGCAAAGA | 1214 | |
| Small fragment: CCTAAAACCCGCCACATCTA | Small fragment: GCCTAGGTTGAGGTTGACCA | 124 | ||
| Long fragment: TCCAACTCATGAGACCCACA | Long fragment: AGGTGATGATGGAGGTGGAG | 1156 | ||
| Small fragment: AGGCGCTATCACCACTCTGT | Small fragment: TTGGTTGATGCCGATTGTAA | 124 | ||
| Nuclear | Long fragment: GGGTGTAGATGATGGGGATG | Long fragment: AACTGCGGAATGAAACAACC | 1172 | |
| Small fragment: AAGCTGCTAAGGTCCCACAA | Small fragment: GGAAAGATCGCTCCAGGAA | 56 | ||
| Long fragment: AGGGCAAAGGATGTGTTACG | Long fragment: AGTGGTTTCTGGTGCGACTT | 1018 | ||
| Small fragment: TGCTGACCTGCTGGATTACA | Small fragment: TCTACAGTCATAGGAATGGATCTATCA | 69 |
All primers were designed with the help of the Primer3 software and synthesized by Sigma-Aldrich.