Literature DB >> 30112504

Camouflage Treatment of a Severe Deep-Bite and Orthognathic Surgery Required Case with En Masse Retraction.

Zeynep Büyükbayraktar1, Cenk Doruk1, Hasan Camcı1.   

Abstract

In adult patients with severe class II division 2 malocclusion, the ideal treatment option is the orthognathic surgery. However, camouflage therapy is also an acceptable treatment option due to its less traumatic and acceptable esthetic and functional results. In this case report, the camouflage treatment with two maxillary premolar extractions in a 21-year-old female patient who did not accept orthognathic surgery is presented. Acceptable esthetic and functional results were obtained at the end of the treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Camouflage treatment; angle class II malocclusion; en masse retraction; orthognathic surgery

Year:  2017        PMID: 30112504      PMCID: PMC6007608          DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2017.17033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Orthod        ISSN: 2148-9505


  12 in total

1.  Orthognathic surgery and dentofacial orthopedics in adult Class II Division 1 treatment: mandibular sagittal split osteotomy versus Herbst appliance.

Authors:  Sabine Ruf; Hans Pancherz
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.650

2.  Sliding mechanics with microscrew implant anchorage.

Authors:  Hyo-Sang Park; Tae-Geon Kwon
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  The problems of borderline cases: an aid for the analysis of orthodontic therapies.

Authors:  Dietmar Kubein-Meesenburg; Dankmar Ihlow
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  Dentoskeletal and soft tissue effects of mini-implants in Class II division 1 patients.

Authors:  Madhur Upadhyay; Sumit Yadav; K Nagaraj; Ravindra Nanda
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Soft tissue limitations in orthodontics: treatment planning guidelines.

Authors:  J L Ackerman; W R Proffit
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Randomized clinical trial comparing control of maxillary anchorage with 2 retraction techniques.

Authors:  Tian-Min Xu; Xiaoyun Zhang; Hee Soo Oh; Robert L Boyd; Edward L Korn; Sheldon Baumrind
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  Dentofacial and soft tissue changes in Class II, division 1 cases treated with and without extractions.

Authors:  S E Bishara; D M Cummins; J R Jakobsen; A R Zaher
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.650

Review 8.  Treatment planning considerations for adult patients.

Authors:  A J Kuhlberg; E Glynn
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  1997-01

9.  Perceptions of facial profile and their influence on the decision to undergo orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  R Bell; H A Kiyak; D R Joondeph; R W McNeill; T R Wallen
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1985-10

10.  Camouflage of Severe Skeletal Class II Gummy Smile Patient Treated Nonsurgically with Mini Implants.

Authors:  Irfan Qamruddin; Fazal Shahid; Mohammad Khursheed Alam; Wafa Zehra Jamal
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2014-12-07
View more
  2 in total

1.  Two middle-aged cases of deep overbite without molar support treated by orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Kazuki Akizuki; Keiko Fujita; Hiroki Kobayashi; Yasuhito Tsuchida; Tsuyoshi Shimo
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2019-09-24

2.  Three-dimensional assessment of two different canine retraction techniques: a randomized split-mouth clinical trial.

Authors:  Şuayip Akın; Hasan Camcı
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 2.750

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.