Literature DB >> 9347106

Soft tissue limitations in orthodontics: treatment planning guidelines.

J L Ackerman1, W R Proffit.   

Abstract

Orthodontists have traditionally viewed structural discrepancies as the major limitation of treatment. In reality, it is the soft tissues that more closely determine therapeutic modifiability. The boundaries of dental compensation for an underlying jaw discrepancy are established by pressures exerted on the teeth by the lips, cheeks, and tongue; limitations of the periodontal attachment; neuromuscular influences on mandibular position; and the contours of the soft tissue facial mask. The ability of the soft tissues to adapt to changes in tooth-jaw relationships are far narrower than the anatomic limits in correcting occlusal relationships. The tolerances for soft tissue adaptation from equilibrium, periodontal, and facial balance standpoints are in the range of 2 to 3 mm for expansion of the mandibular arch and even less for changes in condylar position. Thus, analysis of the soft tissues is the critical step in orthodontic decision making, and this can only be accomplished through physical examination of the patient. Although quantitative measurements cannot be rigorously applied, guidelines for soft tissue assessment, with particular emphasis on facial esthetics, are proposed. From this perspective, a contemporary philosophy of orthodontic practice is offered, with general indications and contraindications for nonextraction, extraction, and surgical treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9347106     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1997)067<0327:STLIOT>2.3.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  19 in total

1.  Comparison of lateral photographic and radiographic sagittal analysis in relation to Angle's classification.

Authors:  Atalia Wasserstein; Nir Shpack; Yossi Ben Yoseph; Silvia Geron; Moshe Davidovitch; Alexander Vardimon
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Camouflage Treatment of a Severe Deep-Bite and Orthognathic Surgery Required Case with En Masse Retraction.

Authors:  Zeynep Büyükbayraktar; Cenk Doruk; Hasan Camcı
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2017-12-01

3.  Cranial base superimposition for 3-dimensional evaluation of soft-tissue changes.

Authors:  Lucia H C Cevidanes; Alexandre Motta; William R Proffit; James L Ackerman; Martin Styner
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  [Prognosis of the facial profile line using the finite element method].

Authors:  B E Holler; R Eckardt; F W Neukam; U Hirschfelder
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2005-03

5.  Proximity of upper central incisors to incisive canal among subjects with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion in various facial growth patterns.

Authors:  Remsh Khaled Al-Rokhami; Karim Ahmed Sakran; Maged Sultan Alhammadi; Mubarak Ahmed Mashrah; Baocheng Cao; Majedh Abdo Ali Alsomairi; Naseem Ali Al-Worafi
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 2.684

6.  Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue profile in 12-year-old southern Chinese.

Authors:  Cindi Sy Leung; Yanqi Yang; Ricky Wk Wong; Urban Hägg; John Lo; Colman McGrath
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 2.151

7.  Treatment of a Class II Malocclusion with Deep Overbite in an Adult Patient Using Intermaxillary Elastics and Spee Curve Controlling with Reverse and Accentuated Archwires.

Authors:  Fabrício Pinelli Valarelli; Ronaldo Carniel; Paula Patrícia Cotrin-Silva; Mayara Paim Patel; Rodrigo Hermont Cançado; Karina Maria Salvatore Freitas; Marcos Roberto de Freitas
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec

8.  Total Face Approach (TFA) 3D Cephalometry and Superimposition in Orthognathic Surgery: Evaluation of the Vertical Dimensions in a Consecutive Series.

Authors:  Giovanna Perrotti; Giulia Baccaglione; Tommaso Clauser; Riccardo Scaini; Roberta Grassi; Luca Testarelli; Rodolfo Reda; Tiziano Testori; Massimo Del Fabbro
Journal:  Methods Protoc       Date:  2021-05-18

9.  Morphological characteristics influencing the orthodontic extraction strategies for Angle's class II division 1 malocclusions.

Authors:  Yongwen Guo; Xianglong Han; Hui Xu; Dongqing Ai; Huan Zeng; Ding Bai
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 2.750

10.  Quantitative analysis of the relationship between maxillary incisors and the incisive canal by cone-beam computed tomography in an adult Japanese population.

Authors:  Tomonari Matsumura; Yuji Ishida; Ayako Kawabe; Takashi Ono
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 2.750

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.