Literature DB >> 3863490

Perceptions of facial profile and their influence on the decision to undergo orthognathic surgery.

R Bell, H A Kiyak, D R Joondeph, R W McNeill, T R Wallen.   

Abstract

Eighty patients, who had previously been evaluated by an oral surgeon and an orthodontist as requiring orthognathic surgery, completed questionnaires rating their perceptions of their own profiles. Half of the patients had decided to undergo surgical correction of their jaw deformities, while the other half had decided against surgical treatment. In addition, booklets containing pretreatment photographs of all 80 patients were mailed to 37 oral surgeons, 46 orthodontists, and 43 lay persons. These three groups of evaluators rated the patients' profiles, using the same rating scales that the patients had used. Cephalometrically, the two patient groups were statistically the same in all skeletal and soft-tissue measures except for ANB (mean difference = 1.8 degrees) and soft-tissue AN-pogonion (mean difference = 2.4 degrees). Differences in these dimensions were considered in subsequent data analyses. Results of this study support the following conclusions: In spite of the fact that surgical treatment may be recommended by dental specialists and indicated by cephalometric measurements, self-perceptions of profile are more important in the patient's decision to elect surgical correction; the perception by others that the profiles of patients deciding against surgery are closer to ideal may have some influence on their decision against surgical correction of their jaw deformities; oral surgeons and orthodontists evaluate facial profiles similarly, but surgeons are more likely to recommend surgical correction; lay persons are more likely to rate an individual's profile as being normal than are dental specialists in orthodontics and oral surgery; in contrast, individuals perceive their own profiles differently than orthodontists, oral surgeons, and lay persons, particularly with respect to the mandibular and dentoalveolar dimensions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3863490     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(85)90132-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod        ISSN: 0002-9416


  20 in total

1.  Long-term follow-up of Class II adults treated with orthodontic camouflage: a comparison with orthognathic surgery outcomes.

Authors:  Colin A Mihalik; William R Proffit; Ceib Phillips
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.650

2.  Camouflage Treatment of a Severe Deep-Bite and Orthognathic Surgery Required Case with En Masse Retraction.

Authors:  Zeynep Büyükbayraktar; Cenk Doruk; Hasan Camcı
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2017-12-01

3.  Facial profile parameters and their relative influence on bilabial prominence and the perceptions of facial profile attractiveness: A novel approach.

Authors:  Erin Stewart Denize; Fraser McDonald; Martyn Sherriff; Farhad B Naini
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 1.372

Review 4.  Is it possible to define the ideal lips?

Authors:  M Kar; N B Muluk; S A Bafaqeeh; C Cingi
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.124

5.  Aesthetic restoration in maxillo-mandibular malformations: the role of genioplasty.

Authors:  Claudio Ungari; Emiliano Riccardi; Gabriele Reale; Alessandro Agrillo; Claudio Rinna; Valeria Mitro; Fabio Filiaci
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2016-02-12

6.  Class II treatment in adults: comparing camouflage orthodontics, dentofacial orthopedics and orthognathic surgery--a cephalometric study to evaluate various therapeutic effects.

Authors:  Gero Kinzinger; Linda Frye; Peter Diedrich
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2009-02-05       Impact factor: 1.938

7.  Service profile of Orthognathic Surgery of a medical school.

Authors:  Caroline Gabriele Marques; José Victor Maniglia; Fernando Drimel Molina
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct

Review 8.  WITHDRAWN: Treatments for adults with prominent lower front teeth.

Authors:  Hideko Minami-Sugaya; Débora A Lentini-Oliveira; Fernando R Carvalho; Marco Antonio C Machado; Clóvis Marzola; Humberto Saconato; Gilmar F Prado
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-05-23

9.  Self-perception of dentofacial attractiveness among patients requiring orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Chris Johnston; Orlagh Hunt; Donald Burden; Mike Stevenson; Peter Hepper
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Treatment in Borderline Class III Malocclusion: Orthodontic Camouflage (Extraction) Versus Orthognathic Surgery.

Authors:  A-Bakr M Rabie; Ricky W K Wong; G U Min
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2008-03-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.