Literature DB >> 30106637

Randomized Trial of Hypofractionated, Dose-Escalated, Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) Versus Conventionally Fractionated IMRT for Localized Prostate Cancer.

Karen E Hoffman1, K Ranh Voong1, Lawrence B Levy1, Pamela K Allen1, Seungtaek Choi1, Pamela J Schlembach1, Andrew K Lee1, Sean E McGuire1, Quynh Nguyen1, Thomas J Pugh1, Steven J Frank1, Rajat J Kudchadker1, Weiliang Du1, Deborah A Kuban1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Hypofractionated radiotherapy delivers larger daily doses of radiation and may increase the biologically effective dose delivered to the prostate. We conducted a randomized trial testing the hypothesis that dose-escalated, moderately hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiation therapy (HIMRT) improves prostate cancer control compared with conventionally fractionated IMRT (CIMRT) for men with localized prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Men were randomly assigned to 75.6 Gy in 1.8-Gy fractions delivered over 8.4 weeks (CIMRT) or 72 Gy in 2.4 Gy fractions delivered over 6 weeks (HIMRT, biologically equivalent to 85 Gy in 1.8-Gy fractions assuming prostate cancer α-to-β ratio of 1.5). Failure was defined as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure (nadir plus 2 ng/mL) or initiation of salvage therapy. Modified Radiation Therapy Oncology Group criteria were used to grade late (≥ 90 days after completion of radiotherapy) GI and genitourinary toxicity.
RESULTS: Most of the 206 men (72%) had cT1, Gleason score 6 or 7 (99%), and PSA level ≤ 10 ng/mL (90%) disease. Androgen deprivation therapy was received by 24%. With a median follow-up of 8.5 years, men treated with HIMRT experienced fewer treatment failures (n = 10) than men treated with CIMRT (n = 21; P = .036). The 8-year failure rate was 10.7% (95% CI, 5.8% to 19.1%) with HIMRT and 15.4% (95% CI, 9.1% to 25.4%) with CIMRT. There was no difference in overall survival ( P = .39). There was a nonsignificant increase in late grade 2 or 3 GI toxicity with HIMRT (8-year 5.0% v 12.6%; P = .08). However, GI toxicity was only 8.6% when rectal volume receiving 65 Gy of HIMRT was ≤ 15%. Late genitourinary toxicity was similar ( P = .84). There was no grade 4 toxicity.
CONCLUSION: The results of this randomized trial demonstrate superior cancer control for men with localized prostate cancer who receive dose-escalated moderately hypofractionation radiotherapy while shortening treatment duration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30106637      PMCID: PMC6804854          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2018.77.9868

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   50.717


  23 in total

1.  Defining biochemical failure following radiotherapy with or without hormonal therapy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer: recommendations of the RTOG-ASTRO Phoenix Consensus Conference.

Authors:  Mack Roach; Gerald Hanks; Howard Thames; Paul Schellhammer; William U Shipley; Gerald H Sokol; Howard Sandler
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2006-07-15       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Prostate cancer and the hypofractionation hypothesis.

Authors:  W Robert Lee
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Less is more: will hypofractionated radiotherapy negatively affect cancer centers or be a Godsend in the new health care environment?

Authors:  Andre A Konski
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.990

4.  Toxicity criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)

Authors:  J D Cox; J Stetz; T F Pajak
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1995-03-30       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  70 Gy versus 80 Gy in localized prostate cancer: 5-year results of GETUG 06 randomized trial.

Authors:  Véronique Beckendorf; Stéphane Guerif; Elisabeth Le Prisé; Jean-Marc Cosset; Agnes Bougnoux; Bruno Chauvet; Naji Salem; Olivier Chapet; Sylvain Bourdain; Jean-Marc Bachaud; Philippe Maingon; Jean-Michel Hannoun-Levi; Luc Malissard; Jean-Marc Simon; Pascal Pommier; Men Hay; Bernard Dubray; Jean-Léon Lagrange; Elisabeth Luporsi; Pierre Bey
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Direct evidence that prostate tumors show high sensitivity to fractionation (low alpha/beta ratio), similar to late-responding normal tissue.

Authors:  David J Brenner; Alvaro A Martinez; Gregory K Edmundson; Christina Mitchell; Howard D Thames; Elwood P Armour
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  RTOG's first quality of life study--RTOG 90-20: a phase II trial of external beam radiation with etanidazole for locally advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  D Watkins-Bruner; C Scott; C Lawton; J DelRowe; M Rotman; L Buswell; C Beard; D Cella
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1995-11-01       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Current clinical presentation and treatment of localized prostate cancer in the United States.

Authors:  Usama Mahmood; Lawrence B Levy; Paul L Nguyen; Andrew K Lee; Deborah A Kuban; Karen E Hoffman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Randomized Phase III Noninferiority Study Comparing Two Radiotherapy Fractionation Schedules in Patients With Low-Risk Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  W Robert Lee; James J Dignam; Mahul B Amin; Deborah W Bruner; Daniel Low; Gregory P Swanson; Amit B Shah; David P D'Souza; Jeff M Michalski; Ian S Dayes; Samantha A Seaward; William A Hall; Paul L Nguyen; Thomas M Pisansky; Sergio L Faria; Yuhchyau Chen; Bridget F Koontz; Rebecca Paulus; Howard M Sandler
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Escalated-dose versus control-dose conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer: long-term results from the MRC RT01 randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  David P Dearnaley; Gordana Jovic; Isabel Syndikus; Vincent Khoo; Richard A Cowan; John D Graham; Edwin G Aird; David Bottomley; Robert A Huddart; Chakiath C Jose; John H L Matthews; Jeremy L Millar; Claire Murphy; J Martin Russell; Christopher D Scrase; Mahesh K B Parmar; Matthew R Sydes
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 41.316

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  [Current controversies in the treatment of localized prostate cancer].

Authors:  R Bischoff; M Chaloupka; T Westhofen; T Grimm; B Schlenker; P Weinhold; D Tilki; C G Stief; A Kretschmer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Moderately Hypofractionated Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy With Simultaneous Integrated Boost for Prostate Cancer: Five-Year Toxicity Results From a Prospective Phase I/II Trial.

Authors:  Anthony Ricco; Nitai Mukhopadhyay; Xiaoyan Deng; Diane Holdford; Vicki Skinner; Siddharth Saraiya; Drew Moghanaki; Mitchell S Anscher; Michael G Chang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-08-21       Impact factor: 6.244

3.  Ten-Year Update of a Randomized, Prospective Trial of Conventional Fractionated Versus Moderate Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Vladimir Avkshtol; Karen J Ruth; Eric A Ross; Mark A Hallman; Richard E Greenberg; Robert A Price; Brooke Leachman; Robert G Uzzo; Charlie Ma; David Chen; Daniel M Geynisman; Mark L Sobczak; Eddie Zhang; Jessica K Wong; Alan Pollack; Eric M Horwitz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Comparative toxicity outcomes of proton-beam therapy versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer in the postoperative setting.

Authors:  Patricia Mae G Santos; Andrew R Barsky; Wei-Ting Hwang; Curtiland Deville; Xingmei Wang; Stefan Both; Justin E Bekelman; John P Christodouleas; Neha Vapiwala
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Older Cancer Patients during the COVID-19 Epidemic: Practice Proposal of the International Geriatric Radiotherapy Group.

Authors:  Nam P Nguyen; Vincent Vinh-Hung; Brigitta Baumert; Alice Zamagni; Meritxell Arenas; Micaela Motta; Pedro Carlos Lara; Arthur Sun Myint; Marta Bonet; Tiberiu Popescu; Te Vuong; Gokula Kumar Appalanaido; Lurdes Trigo; Ulf Karlsson; Juliette Thariat
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 6.  Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Neil R Parikh; Amar U Kishan
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2020 May-Jun

Review 7.  Moderate hypofractionated radiotherapy vs conventional fractionated radiotherapy in localized prostate cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis from Phase III randomized trials.

Authors:  Zhenzhen Yin; Jinqiang You; Youyou Wang; Jinlin Zhao; Shengpeng Jiang; Ximei Zhang; Peiguo Wang; Zhen Tao; Xin Wang; Zhiyong Yuan
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Phase II study of stereotactic body radiotherapy with hydrogel spacer for prostate cancer: acute toxicity and propensity score-matched comparison.

Authors:  Mami Ogita; Hideomi Yamashita; Yuki Nozawa; Sho Ozaki; Subaru Sawayanagi; Takeshi Ohta; Keiichi Nakagawa
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-06-12       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  Whole Pelvic Radiotherapy With Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Boost vs. Conventionally Fractionated Radiotherapy for Patients With High or Very High-Risk Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Shih-Chang Wang; Wei-Chen Ting; Yun-Ching Chang; Ching-Chieh Yang; Li-Ching Lin; Hsiu-Wen Ho; Shou-Sheng Chu; Yu-Wei Lin
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Comparative Effectiveness of Different Radical Radiotherapy Treatment Regimens for Prostate Cancer: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

Authors:  Andreas Pettersson; Daniel Alm; Hans Garmo; Marie Hjelm Eriksson; Enrique Castellanos; Lennart Åström; Jon Kindblom; Anders Widmark; Adalsteinn Gunnlaugsson; Ingela Franck Lissbrant; Per Nilsson; Pär Stattin
Journal:  JNCI Cancer Spectr       Date:  2020-02-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.