| Literature DB >> 27044935 |
W Robert Lee1, James J Dignam2, Mahul B Amin2, Deborah W Bruner2, Daniel Low2, Gregory P Swanson2, Amit B Shah2, David P D'Souza2, Jeff M Michalski2, Ian S Dayes2, Samantha A Seaward2, William A Hall2, Paul L Nguyen2, Thomas M Pisansky2, Sergio L Faria2, Yuhchyau Chen2, Bridget F Koontz2, Rebecca Paulus2, Howard M Sandler2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Conventional radiotherapy (C-RT) treatment schedules for patients with prostate cancer typically require 40 to 45 treatments that take place from > 8 to 9 weeks. Preclinical and clinical research suggest that hypofractionation-fewer treatments but at a higher dose per treatment-may produce similar outcomes. This trial was designed to assess whether the efficacy of a hypofractionated radiotherapy (H-RT) treatment schedule is no worse than a C-RT schedule in men with low-risk prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 1,115 men with low-risk prostate cancer were randomly assigned 1:1 to C-RT (73.8 Gy in 41 fractions over 8.2 weeks) or to H-RT (70 Gy in 28 fractions over 5.6 weeks). This trial was designed to establish (with 90% power and an α of .05) that treatment with H-RT results in 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) that is not worse than C-RT by more than 7.65% (H-RT/C-RT hazard ratio [HR] < 1.52).Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27044935 PMCID: PMC4981980 DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.0448
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Oncol ISSN: 0732-183X Impact factor: 44.544