Sofia Bhatia1, Shiwali Goyal1, Indu R Singh2, Daljit Singh2, Vanita Vanita3. 1. Department of Human Genetics, Guru Nanak Dev University (GNDU), Amritsar, Punjab, 143005, India. 2. Dr. Daljit Singh Eye Hospital, Amritsar, Punjab, India. 3. Department of Human Genetics, Guru Nanak Dev University (GNDU), Amritsar, Punjab, 143005, India. vanita_kumar@yahoo.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To identify the underlying genetic defect for non-syndromic autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa (adRP) with incomplete penetrance in a North Indian family. METHODS: Family history and clinical data were collected. Linkage analysis using 72 fluorescently labeled microsatellite markers flanking all the 26 candidate genes known for adRP was performed. Mutation screening in candidate gene at the mapped region was performed by bi-directional DNA sequencing. RESULTS: Positive two-point lod scores > 1.0 (θ = 0.000) suggestive of linkage were obtained with markers D19S572, D19S927 and D19S926 at 19q13.42, in the vicinity of PRPF31 gene. Mutation screening in all the 14 exonic regions and intron-exon boundaries of PRPF31 revealed a novel change, i.e. c.896G>A (p.Cys299Tyr) in exon eight. The observed change segregated in heterozygous form in all the six affected members and in three carriers, consistent with incomplete penetrance. This substitution was not observed in tested 15 unaffected members and in 200 ethnically matched controls. CONCLUSION: Present study describes mapping of a locus for non-syndromic adRP with incomplete penetrance at 19q13.42 in a North Indian family and identifies a novel missense mutation (p.Cys299Tyr) in PRPF31 localized at the mapped interval. The observed substitution lies in the NOP domain of PRPF31 that exhibit RNA and protein binding surfaces and thus may interfere in the formation of spliceosome complex. Due to p.Cys299Tyr substitution hydrogen bonds are generated, which may result in conformational changes and PRPF31 protein deformity. Present findings further substantiate the role of PRPF31 in adRP with incomplete penetrance and expand the mutation spectrum of PRPF31.
PURPOSE: To identify the underlying genetic defect for non-syndromic autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa (adRP) with incomplete penetrance in a North Indian family. METHODS: Family history and clinical data were collected. Linkage analysis using 72 fluorescently labeled microsatellite markers flanking all the 26 candidate genes known for adRP was performed. Mutation screening in candidate gene at the mapped region was performed by bi-directional DNA sequencing. RESULTS: Positive two-point lod scores > 1.0 (θ = 0.000) suggestive of linkage were obtained with markers D19S572, D19S927 and D19S926 at 19q13.42, in the vicinity of PRPF31 gene. Mutation screening in all the 14 exonic regions and intron-exon boundaries of PRPF31 revealed a novel change, i.e. c.896G>A (p.Cys299Tyr) in exon eight. The observed change segregated in heterozygous form in all the six affected members and in three carriers, consistent with incomplete penetrance. This substitution was not observed in tested 15 unaffected members and in 200 ethnically matched controls. CONCLUSION: Present study describes mapping of a locus for non-syndromic adRP with incomplete penetrance at 19q13.42 in a North Indian family and identifies a novel missense mutation (p.Cys299Tyr) in PRPF31 localized at the mapped interval. The observed substitution lies in the NOP domain of PRPF31 that exhibit RNA and protein binding surfaces and thus may interfere in the formation of spliceosome complex. Due to p.Cys299Tyr substitution hydrogen bonds are generated, which may result in conformational changes and PRPF31protein deformity. Present findings further substantiate the role of PRPF31 in adRP with incomplete penetrance and expand the mutation spectrum of PRPF31.
Authors: Cécilia G Maubaret; Veronika Vaclavik; Rajarshi Mukhopadhyay; Naushin H Waseem; Amanda Churchill; Graham E Holder; Anthony T Moore; Shomi S Bhattacharya; Andrew R Webster Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2011-12-02 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: C Dib; S Fauré; C Fizames; D Samson; N Drouot; A Vignal; P Millasseau; S Marc; J Hazan; E Seboun; M Lathrop; G Gyapay; J Morissette; J Weissenbach Journal: Nature Date: 1996-03-14 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Anna M Rose; Amna Z Shah; Giulia Venturini; Carlo Rivolta; Geoffrey E Rose; Shomi S Bhattacharya Journal: Ann Hum Genet Date: 2013-10-14 Impact factor: 1.670
Authors: Yuchen Lin; Christine L Xu; Gabriel Velez; Jing Yang; Akemi J Tanaka; Mark P Breazzano; Vinit B Mahajan; Janet R Sparrow; Stephen H Tsang Journal: Doc Ophthalmol Date: 2019-09-19 Impact factor: 2.379
Authors: Fei Song; Marta Owczarek-Lipska; Tim Ahmels; Marius Book; Sabine Aisenbrey; Moreno Menghini; Daniel Barthelmes; Stefan Schrader; Georg Spital; John Neidhardt Journal: Genes (Basel) Date: 2021-08-20 Impact factor: 4.096
Authors: Danial Roshandel; Jennifer A Thompson; Rachael C Heath Jeffery; Dan Zhang; Tina M Lamey; Terri L McLaren; John N De Roach; Samuel McLenachan; David A Mackey; Fred K Chen Journal: Genes (Basel) Date: 2021-06-14 Impact factor: 4.096